Ok if you prefer was a pilot, unlike HD
Not being pedantic, just being pedantic.
Either way, the intended recipient for Post #1047 will no doubt not be commenting on it now or ever. Nor will he be adding any anything to the discussion beyond his usual vague platitudes and innuendo's without substance.
I say we stick a fork in this. Its done.
I was hoping to lure HD here to end the derails on other threads.
Well then I ruined that for you by being both specific and factual, both of which are HD Kryptonite. My apologies.
A standard rate turn is two minutes for 360 degrees. The turn depicted here is two and a half minutes for 270 degrees.
The rollout at about five mile "final," which is a perfectly normal starting point for a final approach.
Hani The Hero! Ain't it great!
The story is so solid that the FDR data is not assigned to an airframe. :mrgreen:
Wow, still playing that one? 2006 called and wants its BS back.
Wow, still playing that one? 2006 called and wants its BS back.
Truth persists.
Bull**** walks. :mrgreen:
Lay it out then. Start to finish. Lets here it all finally.
Some people are unable to perceive the truth, even when it is right in front of them. It is hard to describe a rainbow to a blind person. I have no desire to try doing the same with you.eace
Some people are unable to perceive the truth, even when it is right in front of them. It is hard to describe a rainbow to a blind person. I have no desire to try doing the same with you.eace
Well 1064 posts when only one was needed -- "ZERO"Now how did I know that was coming?
Actually it is a winning tactic if you look at the current objective - keep discussion going and going round in circles.Near FIFTEEN YEARS later and truthers STILL pretend they have more than they bring ... winning tactic there truthers !!! :roll:
It was an admission that they had lost the battle for CD - such as it was. Hardly a "battle" - maybe "skirmish"???
You do have a way with words. :yes:Mild taunting?
Now how did I know that was coming?
Because we've been through this before. As you have demonstrated before, it is impossible to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts.
Because we've been through this before. As you have demonstrated before, it is impossible to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts.
Moderator's Warning: |
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?