• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Health nuts going too far?

Fat Busters going too far?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • No

    Votes: 7 87.5%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8

Rosalie

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
http://www.theage.com.au/news/arts/fat-lady-sings-again/2006/07/10/1152383652565.html

I'm sorry, but this story flat out disgusts me.

Opera singer too fat? Sure she needed to loose weight, but she's working down from Size 30 to Size 12!? Loosing that much weight can't be healthy to begin with.

Fat people are chosen as Opera singers for a reason. Not just out of traditional imagery, but their much larger bodies resonate much better. She was only accepted back as an Opera singer, ironically, when she became a WORSE Opera singer.

We don't even know for sure if she had any immediate health risks - she claims it was her own choice of course to have such drastic surgery, but considerring the timing, I'm not sure how likely that is.

She doesn't look right the way she is at all. She looks too "normal". When you got to an opera you expect to see something extraordinary, not ordinary. What happened her lovely long golden locks too? Is this what Opera singers are meant to look like these days, news readers?

I really think the health freaks need beating backwards with a spiked truncheon when an Opera Singer believes anything over Size 12(barely curvy) is "too fat".
 
I prefer to see people lose weight the old fashion way but being fat is never good for your health regardless of your career.
 
talloulou said:
I prefer to see people lose weight the old fashion way but being fat is never good for your health regardless of your career.

It depends. A lot of people are fat because they never excercise and stuff themselves with McDonalds. Other people are fat just because they have low metabolisms and eat a lot.

There is no reason to presume that she was unhealthy purely because she was fat, even if it's likely.

And banning her from being an Opera singer until she looses weight is just plain wrong.
 
Rosalie said:
There is no reason to presume that she was unhealthy purely because she was fat, even if it's likely.

WTF? There is every reason to presume she was unhealthy. Being fat in itself is unhealthy. The fatter you are the more freaking unhealthy you are. That's a fact and facts can't be changed for the sake of political correctness or stroking someones self esteem. Being over weight coincides with multiple health issues both physical and mental. There is no way or circumstance in which being fat is healthy thus it is unhealhty.
 
WTF? There is every reason to presume she was unhealthy. Being fat in itself is unhealthy. The fatter you are the more freaking unhealthy you are. That's a fact and facts can't be changed for the sake of political correctness or stroking someones self esteem.

No, that's not a fact. Simply having more weight does not automatically make you more unhealthy. I am quite overweight but have no real health issues attatched to it. It depends on the person.

By your logic, anorexia is the healthiest option of all?

Being over weight coincides with multiple health issues both physical and mental. There is no way or circumstance in which being fat is healthy thus it is unhealhty.

That you really have to prove.

The problem with getting research on this is that so much of it is funded by diet companies. It's difficult to find unbiased research.

Here's an article from TIME magazine about this mess-

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1066937,00.html
 
Last edited:
Rosalie said:
No, that's not a fact. Simply having more weight does not automatically make you more unhealthy. I am quite overweight but have no real health issues attatched to it. It depends on the person.

By your logic, anorexia is the healthiest option of all?

You may not have noticeable health problems, but that does not mean you're as healthy as you could be. Also, you can be at a healthy weight without being over or under weight, so your anorexia comment falls flat.

Rosalie said:
That you really have to prove.

The problem with getting research on this is that so much of it is funded by diet companies. It's difficult to find unbiased research.

Here's an article from TIME magazine about this mess-

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1066937,00.html

It's pretty obvious that not being overweight is healthier. Also, not to offend you, but overweight people tend to say stuff like this to make themselves feel better.
 
The Opera House can do whatever it wants with itself, people who are both obese and healthy are outnumbered by those obese and unhealthy by 100 to 1. The Opera House wants to make money and wanted to have a good image. It's their decision that their current employee would damage revenue is what probably drove them to fire her and I see no problem with that. This induced her to make an effort to change and indeed she did, in which the opera house rehired her. Everyone's a happy camper, what's the problem?

The motive was profit not health, and the Opera House had every right to try to obtain what they wanted.


Rosalie said:
am quite overweight but have no real health issues attatched to it.

How old are you?
 
Last edited:
Rosalie said:
No, that's not a fact. Simply having more weight does not automatically make you more unhealthy. I am quite overweight but have no real health issues attatched to it. It depends on the person.
I'm glad you don't currently have health issues. But being overweight causes health problems and it is unhealthy.

By your logic, anorexia is the healthiest option of all?
Um nope. I didn't say that anywhere. I think a healthy balanced diet combined with exercise keeps you at a healhy weight. Some people are natuarlly skinnier or heavier than others. But if you are actually "fat" then that's a problem. I'm not recommending people be Paris Hilton skinny by no means. But that opera singer was clearly fat in the before picture. If you can't run up a flight of stairs without out breathing heavy you're too fat.

The charts and BMI and stuff can't be taken too seriously. A person who works out alot and has tons of muscle may come up as "fat" on a chart but they're not.

However that opera singer was not full of muscle. Two people can be the same height and weight and have two completely different bodies in regards to muscle and tone which is why BMI and charts aren't really helpful.

If you are confused about whether or not you are fat then you probably aren't really fat enough to be at an increased health risk. However if you know you are fat and then pointing to inconsistencies in charts that have nothing to do with your fatness then thats something else.

That opera singers BMI would have put her in the fat catagory and rightly so. You can tell by looking at her face in the first picture that she was grossly overweight. When you look at people that live up in to their 100's they're rarely very fat people.

I do agree that the media and diet companies push extremes where women are supposed to be stick thin. I won't dispute that and ridiculous expectations are causing problems for many women who are constantly bombarded with surgically corrected stick thin model types but that doesn't change the fact that when you're fat you're unhealthy.
 
The Opera House can do whatever it wants with itself, people who are both obese and healthy are outnumbered by those obese and unhealthy by 100 to 1.

Did you read the Time Magazine article?

And why is it fair that the Opera House can do what it wants? It's nothing short of discrimination.




But being overweight causes health problems and it is unhealthy.

You sort of have to provide some backing for that. If not statistics, then a logical demonstration of how being fat directly affects your health.
 
The article you gave did not say fat people were healthy , it said fat people often go up and down and when they go down a health improvement shows, the whole gist of the article is that it is better to be fit and healthy then fat but if you are fat then it's better to be active and fat then inactive and fat. The article also clearly states that even if fat people don't' have problems right now, they will develop them.

That opera singer was obese, and being obese does not help your singing at all, with today's modern auditoriums and architecture built specifically to enhance sound there's no need for an opera singer to be weighty. Operas that are shown today are also much more physical then they once were, the stages are much larger and they move around much more, it can be quite a workout. In the before photo she doesn't look as if she was capable of doing anything physical at all.
 
Rosalie said:
And why is it fair that the Opera House can do what it wants? It's nothing short of discrimination.

Are you actually arguing that an artistic organization cannot make its decisions on who to hire based on appearance? That's what art is ABOUT. Just like it's legal for modeling agencies to pick beautiful people over ugly people, just like its legal for casting directors to do the same.

You sort of have to provide some backing for that. If not statistics, then a logical demonstration of how being fat directly affects your health.

Did you even read the link she posted?

Study confirms you can’t be fat — and healthy

Middle-age people who are overweight but have normal blood pressure and cholesterol levels are kidding themselves if they think their health is just fine.

Northwestern University researchers tracked 17,643 patients for three decades and found that being overweight in mid-life substantially increased the risk of dying of heart disease later in life — even in people who began the study with healthy blood pressure and cholesterol levels.

17,000 subjects...I doubt youre going to get a more comprehensive study than that.
 
Rosalie said:
Did you read the Time Magazine article?
And why is it fair that the Opera House can do what it wants? It's nothing short of discrimination.
Discrimination is based on irrelevant characteristics that cannot be changed, the woman lost weight, and she's back. You can't do that with a black person who's barred from drinking at a KKK bar, not to mention looks and public image is an influential part of her job as an opera singer.
 
I dont think I need to add anything to what talloulou has already said. she was right on the mark.
 
Obesity has been proven to be a factor in many major health problems:

"Diseases associated with obesity:
Obesity increases the risk of developing certain diseases. The American Health Foundation, a non-profit research organization dedicated to finding preventive strategies to reduce chronic diseases, convened an expert panel to consider the increasing prevalence of obesity. The expert panel was comprised of authorities on diseases that are directly associated with excess body weight. These findings were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Regardless of this publication, many doctors are not heeding the warning.

Cardiovascular disease risk increases due to overweight elevating blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, and increasing insulin resistance. The location of excess body fat can further increase CVD risk. Central obesity for example, is directly associated with an increased risk of heart disease. A 20% reduction in body weight can reduce CVD risk by 40%. This can be achieved by keeping BMI in the normal range. Over 50% of all cases of hypertension are simply due to being overweight.

The incidence of diabetes increases with increasing weight. Diabetes is three times more likely in obese individuals with a BMI of 28 or greater.

Osteoarthritis symptoms are worse in men and women with a BMI over 25. Excess body weight stresses joint cartilage.

Cancer risk can increase due to elevated hormones associated with obesity, influencing cancer development. Excess estrogen is linked with reproductive system cancers. Adipose tissue (fat tissue) is a major site of estrogen synthesis in women. Scientists link a BMI of 28 to 30 with an increase in cancer risk.

Other diseases associated with obesity include sleep apnea, abdominal hernias, varicose veins, gout, gall bladder disease, respiratory problems including pickwickian syndrome (a breathing blockage linked with sudden death), and liver malfunction.

Massive obesity, indicated by a BMI over 40, is so closely associated with health problems that it is regarded as a disease in its own right
.
"


http://www.drhoffman.com/page.cfm/193



Sorry Roaslie....you are simply wrong on this one.
 
Rosalie said:
By your logic, anorexia is the healthiest option of all?

while we are on the topic of logic, you have just commited the logical fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

talloulou asserted that if you are fat (p), that you are unhealthy(q)
if P, then q.
then you have asserted that if a person is not fat
p is false
that they must be not be unhealthy
Therefore, q is false.

highly illogical.
 
I thought about this thread a little last night. I know I'm an abrupt and frank person, especially online, however it's not my intention to be mean or judgemental....well at least in this particular thread....:mrgreen:

In my opinion it would almost be crueler to agree with someone that being fat is okay and you can be quite fat and healthy. However I do think it's a touchy subject and so perhaps my points could have been made in a less harsh manner.

I know I struggled very hard to quit smoking and I hated when people went off on smokers and what not.

We all have our vices. It's easy to delude yourself by saying crap like, "not all smokers get lung cancer," ect....

But in the end you can't be healthy and fat and you can't be healthy and smoke. Even if we feel healthy being fat or smoking or both:shock: we only feel that way because we aren't use to anything else. When I quit smoking I felt way better. I never thought I was unhealthy smoking. I didn't smoke alot and I didn't have a cough or anything. However when I'm not smoking I have tons more energy and I can run longer and just feel better. I'm sure carrying around alot of extra weight is similar. You think you're fine but you don't realize what you could feel like if you dropped all that extra baggage.
 
Are you actually arguing that an artistic organization cannot make its decisions on who to hire based on appearance?

Fat Ladies are part of the Opera. There is no grounds for "Artistic" discrimination.

Did you even read the link she posted?

Did you read mine?

Her article cites no references, and is also pretty shaky to begin with.

I shouldn't HAVE to do this as it's only encouraging unbacked articles, but any way-

Northwestern University researchers tracked 17,643 patients for three decades and found that being overweight in mid-life substantially increased the risk of dying of heart disease later in life — even in people who began the study with healthy blood pressure and cholesterol levels.

How exactly did it "track" them? Was it a random sample space, or within a certain area?
It also ignores other factors - what's being argued here is that it's possibly to be FAT and healthy. Unfortunately the way the majority of people get fat does make them unhealthy. But it's important to determine this for two reasons; 1) If someone simply cannot loose weight, they may at least be able to substitute the food they eat for slightly larger volumes of less "dangerous" food, 2) This is a long shot, but if someone is to become an opera singer, etc., they may want to intentionally gain weight instead of loosing it. I don't think anyone should ever willingly turn into a huge fatty but some people like being plump. I don't think I WANT to be thin. I like the visual effect of being larger. If I was thin, I'd probably put on weight.

Even if there are health risks - it doesn't necessarily make them "deadly" health risks. If you look after your heart, excercise enough, you should be fine.

But yes, the main problem here is that it still doesn't prove that you can't be fat and overweight, just that particular lifestyles or diets that make you fack generally tend to also make you unhealthy. I've already pointed out why this distinction is important. This kind of thing can't be based on statistics alone.

A total of 1,594 heart disease deaths occurred, 31 of them in people who started the study with normal blood pressure and cholesterol.

31 isn't exactly the most overwhelming number, considerring they started with 494.

Or at least, if you trust this research, that is.



tecoyah said:
Obesity has been proven to be a factor in many major health problems:

"Diseases associated with obesity:
Obesity increases the risk of developing certain diseases. The American Health Foundation, a non-profit research organization dedicated to finding preventive strategies to reduce chronic diseases, convened an expert panel to consider the increasing prevalence of obesity. The expert panel was comprised of authorities on diseases that are directly associated with excess body weight. These findings were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Regardless of this publication, many doctors are not heeding the warning.

Cardiovascular disease risk increases due to overweight elevating blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, and increasing insulin resistance. The location of excess body fat can further increase CVD risk. Central obesity for example, is directly associated with an increased risk of heart disease. A 20% reduction in body weight can reduce CVD risk by 40%. This can be achieved by keeping BMI in the normal range. Over 50% of all cases of hypertension are simply due to being overweight.

The incidence of diabetes increases with increasing weight. Diabetes is three times more likely in obese individuals with a BMI of 28 or greater.

Osteoarthritis symptoms are worse in men and women with a BMI over 25. Excess body weight stresses joint cartilage.

Cancer risk can increase due to elevated hormones associated with obesity, influencing cancer development. Excess estrogen is linked with reproductive system cancers. Adipose tissue (fat tissue) is a major site of estrogen synthesis in women. Scientists link a BMI of 28 to 30 with an increase in cancer risk.

Other diseases associated with obesity include sleep apnea, abdominal hernias, varicose veins, gout, gall bladder disease, respiratory problems including pickwickian syndrome (a breathing blockage linked with sudden death), and liver malfunction.

Massive obesity, indicated by a BMI over 40, is so closely associated with health problems that it is regarded as a disease in its own right
.
"


http://www.drhoffman.com/page.cfm/193



Sorry Roaslie....you are simply wrong on this one.

Oh fantastic. I pointed out how research on this was difficult to find in an unbiased form because of how much of it was funded by diet companies.

You not only provide me with such nonsense, but from a "doctor" that has a section listed "THe Diet" on his website? And I'm "Simply Wrong"?

Note how two of his "references" are from "Nutrition" clinics and how the rest are from 1999, predating the resaerch I posted. If you check up the Medical Journal references they deal with diet more than actual presence of fat.

This poll has left me with very little respect for the populace of this board - how can you not think forcing an opera singer not just into a healthier weight, but loose enormous amounts of weight(which isn't healthy either, by the way) is horrible?

Discrimination is based on irrelevant characteristics that cannot be changed, the woman lost weight, and she's back. You can't do that with a black person who's barred from drinking at a KKK bar, not to mention looks and public image is an influential part of her job as an opera singer.

Incorrect. She could only loose weight through radical surgical procedure. If it was just as "cheap" to turn black people white, would that be fair too?

Looks and public image are part of her job as an opera singer - and opera singers are generally MEANT to be large women! Why are people pulling that BS card? It makes no sense.

There is no reason why a fat person can't look presentable anyway. She was certainly far too fat - but don't you think stomach surgery and loosing half your body mass is a bit extreme?
 
Last edited:
Rosalie said:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/arts/fat-lady-sings-again/2006/07/10/1152383652565.html

I'm sorry, but this story flat out disgusts me.

Opera singer too fat? Sure she needed to loose weight, but she's working down from Size 30 to Size 12!? Loosing that much weight can't be healthy to begin with.

Fat people are chosen as Opera singers for a reason. Not just out of traditional imagery, but their much larger bodies resonate much better. She was only accepted back as an Opera singer, ironically, when she became a WORSE Opera singer.

We don't even know for sure if she had any immediate health risks - she claims it was her own choice of course to have such drastic surgery, but considerring the timing, I'm not sure how likely that is.

She doesn't look right the way she is at all. She looks too "normal". When you got to an opera you expect to see something extraordinary, not ordinary. What happened her lovely long golden locks too? Is this what Opera singers are meant to look like these days, news readers?

I really think the health freaks need beating backwards with a spiked truncheon when an Opera Singer believes anything over Size 12(barely curvy) is "too fat".

The odds of dying of heart disease in this country are 50/50. Think about that. Its mainly because of our diet. If the odds of making it through a commercial flight were 50/50, nobody would ever fly. But with food we don't see a fiery crash on TV when death comes. We silently ruin our health until the heart attack occurs. Food also plays a huge factor in the astronomical health costs in this country, and that's irresponsible. People eat too much. We are more obese than ever before, and too few people care about it.

You mentioned that some people have metabolic issues that make them fat, but they are the tiny exception to the rule. Most people who are fat eat too much, and eat the wrong foods.

You can discriminate against a fat person, and it is not illegal unless the person is clinically obese. Just like you can discriminate against someone long-haired and covered in tattoos. You can discriminate against people who make bad choices. Its not illegal.

The opera singer could have lost weight without surgery. Did she exercise and eat right?
 
You know....the article says that the surgery was something she'd thought about for many years anyway. Apparently, being denied the role for being too fat was just the push she needed to follow through with it. Nothing wrong with that. She looks incredibly happy in the second picture.
 
Back
Top Bottom