- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 58,542
- Reaction score
- 26,482
- Location
- Mentor Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Arguing this point with you is akin to going into an institution and trying to convince Napoleon his is not the rightful Emperor of France. It is simply a waste of time to argue reality with someone who does not reside in it.
Maanfort is going to be tried soon. Have patience.
The 12 indictments against the Russian hackers were just announced on Friday. Have patience for the American connection to be announced.
Of course, in the end, when this is all decided, you will insist that Trump and his campaign had to take these steps to stop the great satan Hillary. All the other lies and excuses and nonsense will be abandoned by the Trumpkins and it will all be Hillary's fault.
It will be like the old Flip Wilson excuse.....'the Devil made me do it!!!"
I saw Strzok being questioned about whether Mueller asked him about his texts, and he said no on each occasion, and then said that Mueller hadn't asked him about any of his texts.
There is no secret code and there is no plot. These are liberals being liberals. The ideology is the same and the agenda is the same, so their approach to news is the same. No matter what the story, they all have the same take. Thats not conspiracy, its groupthink.
I guess Mueller didn't need to question him because just the appearance of impropriety was enough to remove him from the investigation.
That had me laughing out loud.
Mueller didn't ask in the same way a mafia boss doesn’t ask. Like so:
Scene: Vincent Castella in cafeteria, sipping coffee and reading paper. Headline on paper reads “Mafia Boss Castella’s Son Paul Castella Charged With Murder. Fingerprints on gun and knife. Victim’s blood on Castella’s jacket. Out on bail”.
Vincent: This-a reporter! What a bitch! Non mi rumberi a mingia (Don’t break my balls).
Paul: Patri! (Father!) [Paul enters café]
Vincent: My son! [they hug] Sit down, sit down.
Paul: Have you read the…
Vincent: Don’t worry son. Everything will be okay. Have some coffee.
Paul: Dad, I’m sorry about the…
Vincent: Relax boy, just relax, here, have some cake. We’ll take care of it.
Paul: Thanks dad, I don’t know what I woul…
Vincent: Hey, I’m your father. We Castellas look after each other, don’t we?
Paul: Sure dad, but…
Vincent: No buts. We’re gonna fix everything. So son, you gotta good lawyer?
Paul: Well, I …
Vincent: Okay, you take mine. He’s a good lawyer. Now, who are the witnesses?
Paul: Well, there’s…
Let’s leave them there to plot the murders of the witnesses. So why didn’t Vincent ask his son about the fingerprints? Why didn’t he ask him, “Why the hell did you murder someone?”
Fingerprints. Murder. That’s what happens inside the Mafia. It’s all in a day’s work. It was obviously the least of Vincent’s concerns.
Similarly, Mueller doesn’t care about the texts Strzok sent, or Strzok’s bias. They were good references for Strzok as far as Mueller was concerned. Why would he ask about them?
I assumed Strzok would keep his head down and be humble, denying most things and saying a lot of “can’t remembers”. While he did say “can’t remember” a lot, he wasn’t humble at all. In fact he reminded me of an ornery troll. He sat there like a trapped ork, furiously staring at his questioners with real hatred. His contempt and arrogance was mighty obvious. He stained the FBI and is clearly proud about it.
It’s also revealing that Mueller didn’t question him at all about his texts, about why he sent them and how biased they were. It means Mueller is as bad as Strzok, as we assumed all along.
No, if there is evidence, then I will believe it. You just havent provided any. If it is so obvious that even you know it was a crime, why has no one been charged? Theyve thrown everything but the kitchen sink at Manafort, yet nothing on this. How come? Why were none of the Russians at that meeting indicted? Last I heard, Veselnitskia hadnt even been interviewed by Mueller, but you think this is the heart of his case. Go figure.
On this we agree. We don't have any concrete evidence yet (yet definitely enough circumstantial evidence by this point to give a reasonable persona some pause). And that's why there is still an ongoing investigation. Are we agreed on this too?
The alarm on the part of non-Trumpsters is not that there is no concrete evidence presented yet. It's that the Trumpsters are trying to discredit and sabotage and cut short an ongoing investigation before it has a chance to do its job, ie, "let's wrap this up". LOL.
Take off your jacket, grab some popcorn or something, pull up a chair, put up your feet, kick back, and let's see. These things take time. The big hurry to discredit this or get it over with quickly is a little suspicious in itself. Don't you think?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?