- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 2,899
- Reaction score
- 790
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
It doesn't matter, I'm a heterosexual white male over the age of 21.JustineCredible said:Gee, really? Would that be the Constitution Pre-1886, or post?
I'm saying people need to be held accountable for their actions.Partaking in any activity that puts you at risk to contract an STD, is the individuals responsibility and shouldn't be blamed on anyone but themselves.JustineCredible said:So now you're suggesting I partake in irresponsible behaviors, or high risk sexual behaviors?
Gee, must be nice to be so ominipetent.
Yea, whatever.You act as if this is some big secret, when we're bombarded daily with the health risks associated with STD's. Public schools pound it home through literature and health classes.JustineCredible said:Yeah, and by continueing the whole "Abstinence Only" campaign you're allowing a whole new generation of teens who are completely UNAWARE of such risks!
See above^^^JustineCredible said:No, not if they aren't EDUCATED to know those risks.
Exactly, so why should AIDS get special treatment?JustineCredible said:No, I never suggested such thing anywhere. HIV/AIDS is also "naturally occurring" if you want to get picky here. But what you are exemplifying are diseases which are not sexually transmitted.
JustineCredible said:A female who has never had sex before can still be "at risk" even if she waited until she was married to engage in sex with her husband. There's no way to know what he may or may not have been exposed to previously without TESTING!
What's your point here? A virgin male is equally at risk, whether gay or straight.
No, you were off the subject with that last ditty.JustineCredible said:This also goes the other way as well. Just because a female's hymen is no longer intact does not automatically mean she's ever been sexually active. Other trauma can be responsible for this.
(But now I'm getting off subject)