• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hate Speech

It would have to do with the amount of saturation that those services already have in their lives. Most families/companies/social groups organize themselves with the use of Facebook to this very day.
My company has four separate discord channels for their staff to coordinate with and we have a Facebook update every two weeks.
Such reliance is not hard to understand when one sees just how closely tied these social networks are with our own existence on a day to day basis.
Any business that is tied to Facebook or any other third-party service, isn't going to get very far. Particularly when that service determines what that business can or cannot say.

Personally, if I find out that they have a Facebook or Twitter presence, I avoid their business like the plague. They are either anti-American leftists, or enablers of anti-American leftists. Either way, I want nothing to do with such filth. That applies to individuals as well.

Anyone who uses Twitter or Facebook is an anti-American leftist who utterly detests everything about the US.
 
Perhaps you should have gotten an education instead of attending your leftist indoctrination center. Then you would know that "race" is not included in biological taxonomy. At least you amply demonstrated your ignorance on the subject, so that is something.

How much do you hate BLM and Antifa?
 
How much do you hate BLM and Antifa?
They are domestic terrorist organizations supported by the Democratic Party. No different than the KKK, neo-NAZIs, ALF, ELF, etc. They are all Democrat supported terrorist organizations.
 
They are domestic terrorist organizations supported by the Democratic Party. No different than the KKK and neo-NAZIs. They are all Democrat supported terrorist organizations.

lol
 
Right, so clearly there are areas of society in which we all agree society has the right to determine who its in business with.
Huh? Give an example.
 
Any business that is tied to Facebook or any other third-party service, isn't going to get very far. Particularly when that service determines what that business can or cannot say.

Personally, if I find out that they have a Facebook or Twitter presence, I avoid their business like the plague. They are either anti-American leftists, or enablers of anti-American leftists. Either way, I want nothing to do with such filth. That applies to individuals as well.

Anyone who uses Twitter or Facebook is an anti-American leftist who utterly detests everything about the US.
Don't you think that distinction is a bit too extreme given the amount of individual people who make this companies work?
 
Don't you think that distinction is a bit too extreme given the amount of individual people who make this companies work?
No, I do not consider it to be extreme enough. Everyone who works for, much less uses, Facebook and Twitter are anti-American leftist filth and cannot even be construed as being even remotely conservative. Every Facebook and Twitter worker, and user, is the enemy of the nation.
 
There is no such thing as cancel culture. IT’s just another right wing made up term that has no bearing on anything. Another “war on christmas”.

There is totally a cancel culture. The funny thing is that the right wing were the ones that started it. Ever heard of the Dixie Chicks?

If you never heard of them it is because their empire was destroyed by people who didn't like what their lead singer said. She said, "I'm ashamed to be from the same state as George Bush." Go watch the video. She didn't even say it in an aggressive tone. It was just a flippant comment and then she went about singing a song. Dixie Chics were cancelled like an MF.
 
So then you agree there should be consequences for hate speech. Okay then.

Bad logic dummy. Can a person say the F word constantly when they work at Chuck E Cheese? That person should not be arrested or banned from ever working again. Shoot. He can come back to Chuck E Cheese when learns to talk right.

The same goes with using the N word all willy nilly. He should be punished for saying it but then life goes on. When he stops using the N word all willy nilly then come back to work. You are advocating dropping a nuclear bomb on Cuba if a Cuban citizen steals a paper clip from the White House.

You are basically a hateful and disgusting person if you think somebody should die homeless and starve just because they said the N word one time 30 years ago. (strawman or not? You decide.)

There really are sick and disgusting people out there that do not believe a person can not correct bad behavior.
 
When many of us boomers were kids, we heard every kind of ethnic slur you could imagine. Kids everywhere would stick their feet in a circle to pick teams by saying eenie, meenie, minie, mo....you know the rest. Then it started to become socially unacceptable to use them bit by bit. Once Archie made being a bigot and ignoramus the laughing stock of America every single week, that type of person went underground for a long, long time. Apparently, Archie is back now arguing he is being cancelled. You bet we want to cancel him.
 
What about harassing, haranguing, intimidating and otherwise physically accosting "racist people?"

For example, all Republicans and Trump supporters as many Democrats including in Congress call for? According to what you have written, anywhere you go you should be harassed, harangued, intimidated, and otherwise physically accosted anytime you are in public.

What about people on probation for pedophilia, rape and/or other crimes of violence? Should they be harassed, harangued, intimidated and otherwise physically accosted - or is raping a child vastly less than someone who used the N-word?

The leftwing always wins, they always can shift people to the left a little more in each battle. Now if they decide you are a racist, you are worst than a pedophile rapist - and predictably Republicans dash to extremes to prove they aren't racists. Many "Conservatives Republicans" are the liberal Democrats of just a couple decades ago. The Liberal Democrats of a couple decades ago are now of the National Socialist Workers Party, which is a marriage with the super rich corporations on the world.


Maybe racist should be treated like this?????
 
You don't believe people have the right to their own views and opinions?
The obvious answer is, no, leftists do no believe people have the right to their own views or opinions. They are only allowed to have the views and opinions of leftists or they are a "climate denying, racist, mysogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, white supremacist, terrorist."
 
The obvious answer is, no, leftists do no believe people have the right to their own views or opinions. They are only allowed to have the views and opinions of leftists or they are a "climate denying, racist, mysogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, white supremacist, terrorist."
trump-headlines1.jpg


Did you ever consider learning what the limits of free speech are and what is protected?
 
Did you ever consider learning what the limits of free speech are and what is protected?
The limit is the same as any other right. No right may be used to harm another or advocate harm of another. Everything else is protected against government infringement.
 
The limit is the same as any other right. No right may be used to harm another or advocate harm of another. Everything else is protected against government infringement.
Our constitutional free speech protections are limited to the prohibition of being fined and arrested by the government for our speech and actions when theey become an imminent credible threat to others. Being criticized and held accountable via other means such as the loss of a job are not violations of our free speech rights.
 
Our constitutional free speech protections are limited to the prohibition of being fined and arrested by the government for our speech and actions when theey become an imminent credible threat to others. Being criticized and held accountable via other means such as the loss of a job are not violations of our free speech rights.
They are a violation if those criticisms and "being held accountable" comes from government.
 
They are a violation if those criticisms and "being held accountable" comes from government.

Government employees have the same free speech rights that we do.
 
Government employees have the same free speech rights that we do.
Actually, they don't. But at least I know now that you have never served in the military.

It also has nothing to do with government employees, other than they are responsible for enforcing government laws and regulations. The government may not infringe on our constitutionally protected rights.

Speech that is not used to incite violence or cause defamation is protected speech. Government - at any level, including public universities - may not use their power to infringe on protected speech. No matter how offensive they may find that speech.
 
Back
Top Bottom