- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 34,698
- Reaction score
- 19,179
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
here’s the point you’re not really getting, the estimate (which I called an estimate) stated it was an estimate of “newly insured”. Ignoring the estimate was from multiple organizations and the number you use until someone comes up with a better number, conservatives simply said “nuh uh, it includes previously insured”. Magic Presto, they refuted the estimate in their own reality. Whenever a conservative needs to make a fact magically disappear, they simply post “nuh uh, it’s a lie” be it the CBO, BLS, ‘librul’ media, etc. Hence my point is proven that conservatives create their own reality.
And saying that you have no better data doesn't make a guess into a fact. I know you would really like reality to work that way but it doesn't.
Now you have created a reality that Nambla is liberal.
It is.
Let’s face it, we’re talking about an organization of men who are lobbying to get what they want regardless of how it affects others.
Exactly. We call that "liberal".
Sorry, if I was going to pigeon hole that group, I would have to call it conservative. Just replace “sex with underage boys” with “higher allowable levels of arsenic in drinking water” or “lax safety standards” or “formaldehyde is not carcinogenic” .
NO, there is nothing conservative about NAMBLA, they are simply the ugly stepchild of the SJW movement. But it is gaining steam among liberals. Salon.com, a far left magazine, has started taking up the pedophile cause. I am sure within a few years you will be here calling people bigoted jerks for speaking out against pedophiles just like your fellow travelers in the Salon comment section.
So now the total is up to 4 conservative organizations where child rape is tolerated.
Nope, as much as you want your bizarre world view to be reality it simply isn't.
Heck, Catholics in the US are predominantly Democrats.