• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Has this what goverments have come to? (1 Viewer)

nogoodname

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
526
Reaction score
0
Location
Arizona
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
:shock: Grown ups and politions blow up countries they dont like? Is that what it has come to? We blow up Afghanstan and say their country is opressive. We blow up Arab countries and say the people their are terroists or savages? Has this what our world has come to that the people who make laws and vote on them would rather bomb countries then make peace with them? How come America and a few other countries decide the peace of the whole world?

Japan, North Korea, Cambodia, Laos, China, Congo, Peru, Cuba, Lybia, El Savador, Nicaragua, Somalia, Iraq, Bosina, Sudan, Yugoslavia, and Afghanstan were all bombed for politics how many people died? For politics!
 
Last edited:
i gusse this is a stupid rant but i was hoping someone would feel the same gusse not D=:doh
 
It's a good point you've made.
During the Cold war there was ying and yang balancing each other out. Thus very few large scale conflicts.
Today there no longer exists a yang for the ying or vice versa. It's one ocean with one big shark.
Conflict solves nothing, it only reinforces and strengthens pain and hatred.

Here's a brainstorm. Would a world with no conflict be beneficial to a nation who's #1 export is weapons of war?
 
jfuh said:
It's a good point you've made.
During the Cold war there was ying and yang balancing each other out. Thus very few large scale conflicts.
Today there no longer exists a yang for the ying or vice versa. It's one ocean with one big shark.
Conflict solves nothing, it only reinforces and strengthens pain and hatred.

Here's a brainstorm. Would a world with no conflict be beneficial to a nation who's #1 export is weapons of war?
lol no but that is why america makes wars right?

p.s thanks for taking a interest
 
Last edited:
jfuh said:
It's a good point you've made.
During the Cold war there was ying and yang balancing each other out. Thus very few large scale conflicts.
Today there no longer exists a yang for the ying or vice versa. It's one ocean with one big shark.
Conflict solves nothing, it only reinforces and strengthens pain and hatred.

Here's a brainstorm. Would a world with no conflict be beneficial to a nation who's #1 export is weapons of war?
It wasn't ying vs yang. It was freedom vs tyranny.

Conflict stopped slavery, Hitler, etc.

Consider my above comments before you assume that the US is evil.
 
mpg said:
It wasn't ying vs yang. It was freedom vs tyranny.

Conflict stopped slavery, Hitler, etc.

Consider my above comments before you assume that the US is evil.
do u know what yingvs yang is? its good vs bad which is what he is saying Freedom vs tyranny. Freedom=good tyranny=bad. You need to go back to school.:2wave:
 
id love void war to read this and see his comments it would probly be something about how america has the right to controll peace with the world
 
Oh I read it, SleeperCell, It contained one of the rare times we will agree . . .

nogoodname said:
this is a stupid rant
 
nogoodname said:
:shock: Grown ups and politions blow up countries they dont like?

So you are condemning Hezbollah here ?
 
jfuh said:
It's a good point you've made.
During the Cold war there was ying and yang balancing each other out. Thus very few large scale conflicts.
Today there no longer exists a yang for the ying or vice versa. It's one ocean with one big shark.
Conflict solves nothing, it only reinforces and strengthens pain and hatred.

Here's a brainstorm. Would a world with no conflict be beneficial to a nation who's #1 export is weapons of war?

Yea, it was a great time when we were fighting wars by proxy through third world nations, billions of people were living without freedom, and we were all one accident away from annihilation. We should definitely try to get back to that.
 
Voidwar said:
So you are condemning Hezbollah here ?
yep. I never said iwas for them. Im saying its Childish to restort to boming places you dont like. The way Isreal bombed Lebanon for having a radical party there the way America bombed all of those countries for the acts of few.
 
nogoodname said:
yep. I never said iwas for them. Im saying its Childish to restort to boming places you dont like. The way Isreal bombed Lebanon for having a radical party there the way America bombed all of those countries for the acts of few.

go look up the word Duplicitous.

You admit that what you describe was done by Hezbollah first, and in the same breath, you go right back to mentioning America and Israel, because you are a SleeperCell, spreading disinformation and moral relativism to further Islam's attempted war of conquest on the rest of mankind.
 
Voidwar said:
go look up the word Duplicitous.

You admit that what you describe was done by Hezbollah first, and in the same breath, you go right back to mentioning America and Israel, because you are a SleeperCell, spreading disinformation and moral relativism to further Islam's attempted war of conquest on the rest of mankind.
omg you are unbelivable
 
nogoodname said:
omg you are unbelivable


ahahaha good, good, there's been a shortage of internet lingo on this board.

I look forward to seeing more roflcoptors, OMGZORZ!!!1, and pwn3d out of you.:lol:
 
RightatNYU said:
ahahaha good, good, there's been a shortage of internet lingo on this board.

I look forward to seeing more roflcoptors, OMGZORZ!!!1, and pwn3d out of you.:lol:
dude look at his posts is he not ridiculis? All he does is Bash Islam by pointing out things radicals say and do. Let me just look up at things Ann Coutler says for 2 hours then i can bash Christianty god.
 
nogoodname said:
dude look at his posts is he not ridiculis? All he does is Bash Islam by pointing out things radicals say and do.

Again you are lying. The things I am pointing out are in the Quran and the Hadith.

nogoodname said:
things Ann Coutler says for 2 hours then i can bash Christianty god.

Who cares ? Coulter did not write the bible, but Mohammed did write the Quran.
 
Voidwar said:
Again you are lying. The things I am pointing out are in the Quran and the Hadith.



Who cares ? Coulter did not write the bible, but Mohammed did write the Quran.
Omg You dont even read the quran you read it transcribed into english which ahs diffrent meanies for words. Your saying that non muslims will have to pay taxs YOUR POINT? Everyone pays taxes to the goverment. The only thing muslims tax is for protecting them and stuff so stfu. Why dont u go become a nazi while your at it damn bigot. Lets look at your posts "Islam attacked us" "Islam is at war with us" "All muslims are sleepercells" "all muslims hate america." "Muslims want to destory Isreal and the US" and many more go to hell damn bigot
 
Last edited:
nogoodname said:
The only thing muslims tax is for protecting them and stuff

Protecting them from who ? The other muslims who would take all their rights and property in any Sharia court dispute ? I know how Sharia works, and what a dhimmi's rights are in comparison to a Muslim's. A dhimmi cannot beat a Muslim in a Sharia court.

Who are they protecting the dhimmis from ? Themselves, the Muslims. This is called a protection racket, and amounts to extortion.

You are lying about the TRIBUTE exacted from dhimmi's under Sharia.

I am bigotted against Islam, and anyone with any common sense ought to be, as soon as they begin to learn what the Quran and Mohammed the bandit actually say. I hope you don't think that works as some big slam on me. It doesn't. I am bigotted against Islam for very good reasons. The Quran and the Hadith. I am bigotted against evil, oh no you caught me.
 
Last edited:
Voidwar said:
Protecting them from who ? The other muslims who would take all their rights and property in any Sharia court dispute ? I know how Sharia works, and what a dhimmi's rights are in comparison to a Muslim's. A dhimmi cannot beat a Muslim in a Sharia court.

Who are they protecting the dhimmis from ? Themselves, the Muslims. This is called a protection racket, and amounts to extortion.

You are lying about the TRIBUTE exacted from dhimmi's under Sharia.

I am bigotted against Islam, and anyone with any common sense ought to be, as soon as they begin to learn what the Quran and Mohammed the bandit actually say. I hope you don't think that works as some big slam on me. It doesn't. I am bigotted against Islam for very good reasons. The Quran and the Hadith. I am bigotted against evil, oh no you caught me.
show me a country that does that? Show me a country that enslaves none muslims thats right stfu
 
nogoodname said:
show me a country that does that? Show me a country that enslaves none muslims thats right stfu
Three Words Nogood
Sudan, Darfur, Janjaweed
 
Voidwar said:
Three Words Nogood
Sudan, Darfur, Janjaweed
proof? Why should i belive a bigot that will do anything to slander islam? How you like a taste or your own medicine?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Alright, let's tone down the attacks on each other and try to raise the level of debate a lil bit.
 
RightatNYU said:
Moderator's Warning:
Alright, let's tone down the attacks on each other and try to raise the level of debate a lil bit.
sorry but hes the one who started it everytime i offered proof he said that im lieing because im a muslim and i would do anything to not show how "terroirist sleeper cell islam" really is.
 
nogoodname said:
sorry but hes the one who started it everytime i offered proof he said that im lieing because im a muslim and i would do anything to not show how "terroirist sleeper cell islam" really is.
For those that claim of all islamists being extreemists, they should then examine thier own religion. Fundamentalists are not representative of the majority of anyone. With particular to islam.
For any rational person, just think about it, how many radical muslims are there in the world? How many actual muslims are there? Just because a few choose to be suppresive by compeltely misinterpreting a religion hardly represents that the entirty of the religion is bad or fundamentalists. For those that claim it is, that's just plain ignorance.
 
mpg said:
It wasn't ying vs yang. It was freedom vs tyranny.

Conflict stopped slavery, Hitler, etc.

Consider my above comments before you assume that the US is evil.
THat is what ying vs yang is. For every good there exists an evil. For light there exists dark, ying and yang.
Conflict did not stop slavery, it was rationalization that stopped it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom