• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

*Has tecoyah Become Cnredd?* (1 Viewer)

chesswarsnow

Banned
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
501
Reaction score
1
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Sorry bout that,

1. I was wondering has anyone else noticed that tecoyah has been taking on Cnredd's persona?
2. I myself have found him coming un-hinged recently.
3. Seem's he has a mission to have me banned or confined to the basement.
4. Unless I am mistaken, this is still Vauge's site.
5. And I am sure Vauge would have to disagree with this type of action from a mod team member.:3oops:
6. Vauge is a respectable person, and I am not worried that I could get banned by tecoyahs tactics.;)
7. Even if the poll tecoyah has made in *Hear me Gripe.* goes badly, I can't see myself being banned or silenced in the basement.:cool:
8. If I am all wrong about Vauge, then, IMHBO *Give me Freedom or Give Me Banning*, I won't be apart of DP if I were to be banned to the basement.:shock:
9. There's other Debate Sites.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Dude, tecoyah is the man. He is doing everything right.

You are the one who is out of line, you have been piisssing off the entire DP.com community and deserve to be banned. You dont even debate, you just make up stuff and try to pass it of for fact, which doesnt go well for you because we are actually smart. Then you just say nuh-uh and make fun of the people trying to debating by saying your " sorry bout that 123 ha ha blah award! I win the debate! regards from sir blah blah blah" If anyone doesnt believe me look at any of his posts. You will see that everyone gets frustrated with his child like antics and it gives DP.com a bad name. And i like it here. Please end the madness and just ban chess. 99 out of 100 would appreciate it very much.
 
I submit a larger question.
Has chesswarsnow become jimmyjack...:shock:
Are they one in the same?
 
Moderator's Warning:
This thread is best suited for the Basement.


Imagine that debatepolitics.com is a stage.
Allow me to show you the trap door.
Welcome to the Basement.

teacher will show you your chairs.
 
Last edited:
chesswarsnow said:
Sorry bout that,

1. I was wondering has anyone else noticed that tecoyah has been taking on Cnredd's persona?
2. I myself have found him coming un-hinged recently.
3. Seem's he has a mission to have me banned or confined to the basement.
4. Unless I am mistaken, this is still Vauge's site.
5. And I am sure Vauge would have to disagree with this type of action from a mod team member.
6. Vauge is a respectable person, and I am not worried that I could get banned by tecoyahs tactics.
7. Even if the poll tecoyah has made in *Hear me Gripe.* goes badly, I can't see myself being banned or silenced in the basement.:cool:
8. If I am all wrong about Vauge, then, IMHBO *Give me Freedom or Give Me Banning*, I won't be apart of DP if I were to be banned to the basement.
9. There's other Debate Sites.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


:2funny:

First posted at 10:25pm
moved to the basement at 11:00pm


:2funny:
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Lets look at this site closer.
2. IMHBO if I were to be banned from DP, I would forget all about everyone in here in two weeks.:cool:
3. Except three people, vauge, Simon W. Moon, and danarhea, these three are the best this site has.
4. All you others are rather forgetable.
5. Not being rude and all, but really, your vanilla.
6. You try to fit into what you *think* that will get you liked by all.
7. You people are afraid to say what you think.
8. I say what everyone wants to say, but is afraid to do so.
9. Or atleast would like to be able to say, if you had my huge brain, IMHBO.
10. Yes it is hard to always be on the top of the heap, seems all those underlingers want to take pot shots at you.:lol:

Regards,
SirJaemsofTexas
 
chesswarsnow said:
Regards,
SirJaemsofTexas

:2rofll: He spelled his OWN NAME WRONG!!!:2rofll: :lamo
 
chesswarsnow]Sorry bout that,

1. Lets look at this site closer.

No lets not.

2. IMHBO if I were to be banned from DP, I would forget all about everyone in here in two weeks.:cool:

one could only HOPE so.

3. Except three people, vauge, Simon W. Moon, and danarhea, these three are the best this site has.

hey chess you have some brown chit on your noise

4. All you others are rather forgetable.
(Forgettable)
You hurt my feelings, but I'm over it.

5. Not being rude and all, but really, your vanilla.

I bet you want to live in a Chocolate City.

6. You try to fit into what you *think* that will get you liked by all.
Like you being a kissa$$ on #3
7. You people are afraid to say what you think.
Not at all its you who's afraid to listen to others.

8. I say what everyone wants to say, but is afraid to do so.
But then you have to come back to earth.


9. Or atleast would like to be able to say, if you had my huge brain, IMHBO.

So I guess your brain in stored inside your a$$?..psss. its “at least”. Two words not one.

10. Yes it is hard to always be on the top of the heap, seems all those underlingers want to take pot shots at you.:lol:

You can stay on top of your own chit pile.


Regards,
SirJaemsofTexas

So much for the huge brain theory dipchit, you just misspelled your own name..LOL

Good luck with the spelling thing..:2wave:
 
chesswarsnow said:
Sorry bout that,

1. Lets look at this site closer.
2. IMHBO if I were to be banned from DP, I would forget all about everyone in here in two weeks.:cool:
3. Except three people, vauge, Simon W. Moon, and danarhea, these three are the best this site has.
4. All you others are rather forgetable.
5. Not being rude and all, but really, your vanilla.
6. You try to fit into what you *think* that will get you liked by all.
7. You people are afraid to say what you think.
8. I say what everyone wants to say, but is afraid to do so.
9. Or atleast would like to be able to say, if you had my huge brain, IMHBO.
10. Yes it is hard to always be on the top of the heap, seems all those underlingers want to take pot shots at you.:lol:

Regards,
SirJaemsofTexas


I just don't get this. In all sincerity, do you actually believe the things you type or is this just some sort of silly character you've invented? Are you seriously on a mission to turn yourself into some sort of Internet martyr? Let's look at something....

* Your warning meter is at zero and you continue to debate through a laundry list, in which usually there is a single pointed sentence to debate amongst the sophomoric banter throughout.

.....Yet, you constantly declare the "if you were banned" scenario and you insist upon how you are "fighting against mighty Internet powers to stifle your freedom of speech." Something just doesn't add up to this martyr persona you are desperately trying to invent for yourself.


Your thoughts.....
 
Last edited:
GySgt said:
I just don't get this. In all sincerity, do you actually believe the things you type or is this just some sort of silly character you've invented? Are you seriously on a mission to turn yourself into some sort of Internet martyr? Let's look at something....

* You're warning meter is at zero and you continue to debate through a laundry list, in which usually there is a single pointed sentence to debate amongst the sophomoric banter throughout.

.....Yet, you constantly declare the "if you were banned" scenario and you insist upon how you are "fighting against mighty Internet powers to stifle your freedom of speech." Something just doesn't add up to this martyr persona you are desperately trying to invent for yourself.


Your thoughts.....

Sorry bout that,

1. I for one am not acting like the martyr. Not constantly, tecoyah just started this seriously, with his poll. Thou there was talk about it before now.
2. If you hadn't noticed tecoyah is on a mission to have me banned, I don't appreciate this.
3. The Liar tecoyah, was supposed to be my next martyr for the *Blah Award*, which he claims not to be a mod team member, but Seeing he has mod team membership I can not put him on my *Iggy Award* List.
4. tecoyah lied about saying no one wants me here, or I don't add overall good effect on DP. He lies. Plain and simple. He's jealous.
5. That I can create so much debate, but him with all his technical points and views, can't get 100 posts and or 3k views on a Thread.
6. Also he's an angry Liberal, who always wants to shut up anyone who does not agree with him.
7. He's slanderous.
8. Agruementive.
9. Rude.
10. And ready to talk gutter all the time.
11. My admittingly saying that I may be banned, is just looking at reality, perhaps, who knows?
12. I'm not worried at all of being banned.
13. There's many other sites, to share my views.
14. Some of the Liberals here I can live without, and I am grateful for the Iggy Button. Those who don't appreciate my posts could learn to use it too.
15. I don't seek to attack any *one* person here, thou my generalities do encompass many, I don't target my banter, when I am bantering, but I don't always use banter.
16. Gysgt, you on the most part haven't attacked my way of posting, and I think you have till now be fair, about that, but if you think I can be ground down by many attacks, think again bud.
17. If you can't appreciate my views and post, then ignore them. But that would be to easy eh bud?:roll:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
chesswarsnow said:
Sorry bout that,

1. I for one am not acting like the martyr. Not constantly, tecoyah just started this seriously, with his poll. Thou there was talk about it before now.
2. If you hadn't noticed tecoyah is on a mission to have me banned, I don't appreciate this.
3. The Liar tecoyah, was supposed to be my next martyr for the *Blah Award*, which he claims not to be a mod team member, but Seeing he has mod team membership I can not put him on my *Iggy Award* List.
4. tecoyah lied about saying no one wants me here, or I don't add overall good effect on DP. He lies. Plain and simple. He's jealous.
5. That I can create so much debate, but him with all his technical points and views, can't get 100 posts and or 3k views on a Thread.
6. Also he's an angry Liberal, who always wants to shut up anyone who does not agree with him.
7. He's slanderous.
8. Agruementive.
9. Rude.
10. And ready to talk gutter all the time.
11. My admittingly saying that I may be banned, is just looking at reality, perhaps, who knows?
12. I'm not worried at all of being banned.
13. There's many other sites, to share my views.
14. Some of the Liberals here I can live without, and I am grateful for the Iggy Button. Those who don't appreciate my posts could learn to use it too.
15. I don't seek to attack any *one* person here, thou my generalities do encompass many, I don't target my banter, when I am bantering, but I don't always use banter.
16. Gysgt, you on the most part haven't attacked my way of posting, and I think you have till now be fair, about that, but if you think I can be ground down by many attacks, think again bud.
17. If you can't appreciate my views and post, then ignore them. But that would be to easy eh bud?:roll:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Meh. I guess that's what I get for simply questioning your frame of mind about boasting about your "bannishment" of which isn't even a discussion. :shrug:
 
GySgt said:
Meh. I guess that's what I get for simply questioning your frame of mind about boasting about your "bannishment" of which isn't even a discussion. :shrug:


Sorry bout that,
1. In a non argumentative sort of way I am attacking tecoyah back.:cool:
2. Piece by piece I am pulling him down off his high horse.
3. Why wouldn't I?
4. He is slandering me.
5. I'm not going to slander him, just going to point out the facts, the way I see them, thats all I got to do to defeat him.:shock:
6. He hasn't a leg to stand on, but the mere fact that he keeps slandering me, makes it necessary to attack him.
7. He really is his worst enemy.:lol:
8. I don't even dislike him, or disdain him as a person, just feeding him back what he's dishing out, with the CWN touch.
9. In reality he should be banned from me with a *Blah Award*. He earned it, read some of his attacks.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
*yawn*

A few members (not I) have taken the liberty of looking through your forum history. They have shared it with me.

Interestingly enough:
1.1 All the other forums you have been on with either chess or SirJames (that google found) - you equally target and jump in for dissonance regardless of the topic.
1.2 You create a unique posting style that is annoying to that forum - wow, another forum you acutally post in sentences no numbers! I would love to be fly on the wall to see your notebook of personas.
1.3 Your like a fake orgasm - sounds great but does nothing.
1.4 Your "sorry about that" is annoying as hell - and you know it.
1.5 Your equally vanilla. Sorry dude, there have been worse posters.
1.6 The only reason your still here is because there are no rules against your current actions.
1.6.5 I am thinking of creating one.
 
vauge said:
1.3 Your like a fake orgasm - sounds great but does nothing.

:rofl :lamo It's funny cause it's true.
 
I have a theory about chess's posting style based on GySgt's comment of chess's martyrsism. You see, I sometimes post scripture the same way chess posts his comments...line item style, that is....minus the "sorry" thing.

I think that chess sees his words as the words of God, and presents them as such. You just need to put the lines back in paragraph format.

Experiment:
Gospel of chess: post 12:1-9;
1. In a non argumentative sort of way I am attacking tecoyah back. 2 Piece by piece I am pulling him down off his high horse. 3 Why wouldn't I? 4 He is slandering me. 5 I'm not going to slander him, just going to point out the facts, the way I see them, thats all I got to do to defeat him. 6 He hasn't a leg to stand on, but the mere fact that he keeps slandering me, makes it necessary to attack him. 7 He really is his worst enemy. 8 I don't even dislike him, or disdain him as a person, just feeding him back what he's dishing out, with the CWN touch. 9 In reality he should be banned from me with a *Blah Award*. He earned it, read some of his attacks.
Kinda looks like scripture to me……
 
Last edited:
vauge said:
*yawn*

A few members (not I) have taken the liberty of looking through your forum history. They have shared it with me.

Interestingly enough:
1.1 All the other forums you have been on with either chess or SirJames (that google found) - you equally target and jump in for dissonance regardless of the topic.
1.2 You create a unique posting style that is annoying to that forum - wow, another forum you acutally post in sentences no numbers! I would love to be fly on the wall to see your notebook of personas.
1.3 Your like a fake orgasm - sounds great but does nothing.
1.4 Your "sorry about that" is annoying as hell - and you know it.
1.5 Your equally vanilla. Sorry dude, there have been worse posters.
1.6 The only reason your still here is because there are no rules against your current actions.
1.6.5 I am thinking of creating one.

Gawd, I love you, vauge! :2wave:
 
Kelzie said:
:rofl :lamo It's funny cause it's true.

Has Kelzie ever faked one? ;)
 
I happen to know cnredd, and tecoyah, you're no cnredd.:lol:
 
vauge said:
1.4 Your "sorry about that" is annoying as hell - and you know it.....
....1.6 The only reason your still here is because there are no rules against your current actions.
Rule 3, vauge.

Chess knows that his "sorry bout that" annoys the vast majority of people here, yet he purposely continues. Thus he is deliberately inciting flame from others. It's trolling, if nothing ells.
 
Jerry said:
Rule 3, vauge.

Chess knows that his "sorry bout that" annoys the vast majority of people here, yet he purposely continues. Thus he is deliberately inciting flame from others. It's trolling, if nothing ells.

Vauge,

I tend to agree...he is contributing nothing and intentionally inciting the responses he gets. His whole MO is to create a feeling of hostility through being rudely dismissive with his "sorry about that" routine. He is clearly trolling for an aggressive response and I dont believe that is the type of atmosphere we want here at DP. He simply has found a way to take his obtuse nature to the very edge of what is acceptable and that, in and of itself, is an affront to your authority. There is nothing stopping you from drawing that line back just slightly and leaving him in the red zone of banishment...and this time, I dont think there will be any outcry against the action...the rest of us want him gone and those who dont care...simply dont care.
 
Kelzie said:
Puh-leaze. I'm female. Do you even have to ask?
Quite right. Have you ever had a real one? From a person other than yourself, I mean. Pulsating shower heads don't count.
 
Jerry said:
Quite right. Have you ever had a real one? From a person other than yourself, I mean. Pulsating shower heads don't count.

*cough* I plead the fifth.
 
Kelzie said:
*cough* I plead the fifth.
.......you don't mind if I just use, er, look....at your full avatar pic for a couple moments, do you? Maybe I should just print it out......yes....keep it in my wallet for those slow times at work.......laminate it for the shower.......go to Kinko's and have it printed onto a sheet.....oh my wife would like that!......
 
Jerry said:
.......you don't mind if I just use, er, look....at your full avatar pic for a couple moments, do you? Maybe I should just print it out......yes....keep it in my wallet for those slow times at work.......laminate it for the shower.......go to Kinko's and have it printed onto a sheet.....oh my wife would like that!......

Thats almost creepy...but in that hot sort of way...like a sexy stalker...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom