• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Haha NYT gets owned by "stupid" candace owens (1 Viewer)

Simpletruther

DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
3,291
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
If this is political discourse, democracy was dead long before Trumpists attempted to destroy it.
 

What an embarrassment they are compared to their former life.

They are a rank partisan outfit just like most of the rest.

That is what drives these stupid blunders.
If this exchange is true, it's not surprising. Likely a young 20 something staffer giddy to shake the tiger by the tail to see if anything comes out.
 
If this exchange is true, it's not surprising. Likely a young 20 something staffer giddy to shake the tiger by the tail to see if anything comes out.
No coincidence they have been hiring a lot of uniformed leftists.
 

What an embarrassment they are compared to their former life.

They are a rank partisan outfit just like most of the rest.

That is what drives these stupid blunders.
Owens’ best quality is her stupidity. It’s all downhill from there.

Two of the NY Times articles she referenced were regarding Jews in Ukraine and Zelensky’s being Ukraine’s first Jewish president. No corruption. The third NY Times editorial was dated 4/1/16, 3 years prior to Zelensky’s inauguration, the beginning of Ukraine’s earnest efforts to rid itself of widespread corruption.

The other articles Owens referenced were from other sources.
FAED6654-87EF-4BAD-90C5-06629E4C3C2F.jpeg

Owens was politely confronted with her bogus accusations of corruption in Ukraine currently.

Her idiotic and dishonest response was classic Candice Owens.

To anyone paying attention, Owens owned herself. Again.
 
No coincidence they have been hiring a lot of uniformed leftists.

Would those be Nazi uniforms?

Didn't Glenn Beck like to dress up like a Nazi or something strange like that on his old TV show?
 
Would those be Nazi uniforms?

Didn't Glenn Beck like to dress up like a Nazi or something strange like that on his old TV show?
I never saw a show with him.
 
Why is everything a haha moment? Can't we talk anymore?
 
Owens’ best quality is her stupidity. It’s all downhill from there.

Two of the NY Times articles she referenced were regarding Jews in Ukraine and Zelensky’s being Ukraine’s first Jewish president. No corruption. The third NY Times editorial was dated 4/1/16, 3 years prior to Zelensky’s inauguration, the beginning of Ukraine’s earnest efforts to rid itself of widespread corruption.

The other articles Owens referenced were from other sources.
View attachment 67381516

Owens was politely confronted with her bogus accusations of corruption in Ukraine currently.

Her idiotic and dishonest response was classic Candice Owens.

To anyone paying attention, Owens owned herself. Again.
Nice try to cover for the NYT, but.......itS pure bs.

A quick goggle gets this:

From the times along with countless other sources on Ukraine corruption.

They have been ranked as one of the most corrupt nations in the world for years. The times is full of leftist no nothing partisan hacks. It's not news any more.

Candace can have an IQ of 70 and it wouldn't change this fact.
 
Candace has to feel good she is relevant for about 10-15 minutes.
 
Nice try to cover for the NYT, but.......itS pure bs.

A quick goggle gets this:

From the times along with countless other sources on Ukraine corruption.

They have been ranked as one of the most corrupt nations in the world for years. The times is full of leftist no nothing partisan hacks. It's not news any more.

Candace can have an IQ of 70 and it wouldn't change this fact.
I’m not covering for the NY Times, and your previously not included article does not change the fact that Owens owned herself with her own references.
 
The Blaze. Dismissed.
How many news sources do you want? Of course the left media will not cover NYT stupidity. It is not that big of a story other than to show the stupidity and hypocrisy of the paper.
 
I’m not covering for the NY Times, and your previously not included article does not change the fact that Owens owned herself with her own references.
And? She is not the brightest bulb, which all the more shows how rank partisan NYT is being owned by her.

That would rarely happen with an unbiased outfit, the times has lost all superior credibility as is just another partisan voice living off its reputation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom