- Joined
- Sep 25, 2005
- Messages
- 15,675
- Reaction score
- 2,979
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Republicans quickly tried to change the subject from their immigration cut and run to the Democrats' cut and run on Iraq. House Majority Leader John Boehner (Ohio) held a news conference and declared that Democrats have "no plan at all to confront the real threat of terrorism and to achieve victory in a global war on terror."
But David Rogers, a Wall Street Journal reporter and Vietnam veteran, had prepared an ambush for Boehner. "In Vietnam, they used to put us out in these fire support bases and hope we would get attacked," he said. "Is that what you are doing? You are putting people in Iraq and hoping they get attacked so you can bring out the terrorists?"
"No, no," Boehner protested.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/20/AR2006062001343.html
What makes me sick is this allegation that the war in Iraq was started due to a "real threat of terrorism." Oh really? Where are the weapons of mass destruction? When did Saddam Hussein threaten to use them on us? Oh, and the insugents--when did they arrive in Iraq? Wasn't it after we invaded?
Do the Republicans genuinely think that the public is buying this? Shall we talk about the Dept. of Homeland Security and how unprepared we are for another terrorist attack?