• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Gunman wounds 20 in shooting spree at Montreal college... (1 Viewer)

aps said:
Wow. Rather than feel sad for the 20 people wounded, you make a joke solely for the purpose of attacking Moore. How pathetic.


lmao. you would know pathetic when you saw it thats for sure.

just out of curiousity, how the hell do you know how I feel ?

I bet you fell for moores line of crap too didnt you?
 
ProudAmerican said:
lmao. you would know pathetic when you saw it thats for sure.

just out of curiousity, how the hell do you know how I feel ?

Well, considering the content of your post, I think it was rational for me to infer that you posted this to make a dig at Michael Moore since the only words you posted yourself were, "I was absolutely sure Michael Moore said this kind of thing wasnt possible up there!!"


I bet you fell for moores line of crap too didnt you?

Umm, wrong. Although I must say that the fact that he bothers you and other right-wingers thrills me. When people love or hate someone, it means that they have strong feelings about that person. When you're apathetic, you don't care. The fact that he can evoke such strong feelings is indicative of him having the ability to impact your emotions.
 
Well, considering the content of your post, I think it was rational for me to infer that you posted this to make a dig at Michael Moore since the only words you posted yourself were, "I was absolutely sure Michael Moore said this kind of thing wasnt possible up there!!"

you and the word "rational" in the same sentence is almost laugh.....no wait, its completely laughable.

Umm, wrong. Although I must say that the fact that he bothers you and other right-wingers thrills me.

he bothers me about as much as Ann Coulter bothers you.

When people love or hate someone, it means that they have strong feelings about that person.

nahh, I just think hes a lying, missinforming idiot.

The fact that he can evoke such strong feelings is indicative of him having the ability to impact your emotions.

or it just means I think hes an idiot, and this story shows it to some degree.

I remember something about him claiming those good ole Canadians left their doors unlocked because gun crime simply isnt and issue up there.

so much for that theory.
 
hey, aps,

everytime a leftist makes a post about how Bush has caused the deaths of our servicemen due to incompetence, does that mean said leftist has no compassion for the dead, and simply seeks make a comment to attack Bush?

are they as pathetic as I am?

or is your partisanship causing you to go on another rant?

just some food for thought.
 
On other boards, moonbats were blaming the USA and the GOP for lax gun laws letting this CANADIAN massacre happen. Sawah Bwady uses death for her ARC propaganda
 
Killed one and wounded 19?

Holy ****. Is he a bad shot or what?

Canadians better stick with growing weed.
 
Does anyone really care about what happened or is this incident just fodder to create and continue another lame partisan thread, so some posters can either feel superior or bash others? Pathetic.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Does anyone really care about what happened or is this incident just fodder to create and continue another lame partisan thread, so some posters can either feel superior or bash others? Pathetic.

Thank you! I totally agree.
 
ProudAmerican said:
hey, aps,

everytime a leftist makes a post about how Bush has caused the deaths of our servicemen due to incompetence, does that mean said leftist has no compassion for the dead, and simply seeks make a comment to attack Bush?

are they as pathetic as I am?

or is your partisanship causing you to go on another rant?

just some food for thought.


pretty clear why this was ignored I think.
 
TurtleDude said:
On other boards, moonbats were blaming the USA and the GOP for lax gun laws letting this CANADIAN massacre happen. Sawah Bwady uses death for her ARC propaganda

Why does Sarah Brady, et al, hate weekends?
They wake up in the morning, hoping that there will be a school shooting sometime that day. Schools are closed on the weekend, so...

One can only wonder what sort of reasoning leads someone to conclude that US gun laws allowed/caused this to happen. Clearly, its a line of thought that starts with a conclusion and looks for a way to support it.
 
TurtleDude said:
On other boards, moonbats were blaming the USA and the GOP for lax gun laws letting this CANADIAN massacre happen. Sawah Bwady uses death for her ARC propaganda

Yeah, god forbid the wife of a man who was shot by a madman with a gun should have something to say about madmen with guns. It's ****ing outrageous. :roll:

When are you guys going to take on those bitches at MADD? I wanna be here for that one.
 
mixedmedia said:
Yeah, god forbid the wife of a man who was shot by a madman with a gun should have something to say about madmen with guns. It's ****ing outrageous. :roll:
Having something to say isnt ourtageous.
Its WHAT she says that's outrageous.

You have to REALLY "think outside the box" to come up with an argument that blames US laws for a shooting in Canada. :roll:
 
Goobieman said:
Having something to say isnt ourtageous.
Its WHAT she says that's outrageous.

You have to REALLY "think outside the box" to come up with an argument that blames US laws for a shooting in Canada. :roll:

Well, we've all been known to be unjudicious with the art of "cause and effect" every once in a while.
 
mixedmedia said:
Yeah, god forbid the wife of a man who was shot by a madman with a gun should have something to say about madmen with guns. It's ****ing outrageous. :roll:

When are you guys going to take on those bitches at MADD? I wanna be here for that one.

Sarah Brady was an insignifcant fringe member of the washington power scene until her husband was shot. Her own Brady bill would not have prevented Hinkley's crime and lets face it-someone who gets within 15 feet of the president and starts shooting is basically engaged in a suicide mission. No way are you going to get away unshot or unarrested. Since Hinkley was not deterred by the prospects of 1) being killed by the secret service 2) being executed if he killed someone 3) spending a long long time in federal prison no matter what, its obvious that NO GUN LAW in the world would have deterred him either

sarah brady knows that. She also started wanting only a background check (which almost all NRA members support) and an unneeded waiting period(now that the BGC is instant and 5 days won't add accuracy to it). When she saw how much fame and power she could get trotting out her injured husband, she made a career out of gun banning. She became hateful toward the NRA when they opposed what can honestly be seen as unconstitutional infringements and her mission changed from actually stopping gun crime (none of her positions will actually do that) to bashing the NRA and trying to infringe on the rights of gunowners. Her glee at every gun tragedy is well documented
 
TurtleDude said:
by the prospects of 1) being killed by the secret service 2) being executed if he killed someone 3) spending a long long time in federal prison no matter what
Unfortunately, none of the above happened to Hinkley. He is now free to spend weekends with his mommy and daddy.
 
Gill said:
Unfortunately, none of the above happened to Hinkley. He is now free to spend weekends with his mommy and daddy.


very true-I was at Yale when Jodie Foster was a freshman and this nonsense started. Feds everyplace. The point that Sawah Bwady seems to ignore is that Hinkley was beyond "deterrance" short of being shot or arrested. No gun law in existence would have stopped him from maiming her husband. It is amazing that she continues to spout out that the idiotic laws she pushes for would have changed her husband's fate.

Like almost all of her actions-its a lie
 
TurtleDude said:
very true-I was at Yale when Jodie Foster was a freshman and this nonsense started. Feds everyplace. The point that Sawah Bwady seems to ignore is that Hinkley was beyond "deterrance" short of being shot or arrested. No gun law in existence would have stopped him from maiming her husband. It is amazing that she continues to spout out that the idiotic laws she pushes for would have changed her husband's fate.

Like almost all of her actions-its a lie
I agree. It's sad that she pushes her husband around in his wheelchair to tout her anti-constitutional crap. She treats him like a pet monkey.

I just hope this doesn't change Canada's loosening of their idiotic gun registration law. It was costing them 10 times what they promised and parts of the country were almost in revolt over it. Luckily, the new PM came in and almost immediately announced changes to the law.
 
Gill said:
I agree. It's sad that she pushes her husband around in his wheelchair to tout her anti-constitutional crap. She treats him like a pet monkey.

I just hope this doesn't change Canada's loosening of their idiotic gun registration law. It was costing them 10 times what they promised and parts of the country were almost in revolt over it. Luckily, the new PM came in and almost immediately announced changes to the law.

who knows, when a nut with a registered weapon killed 19 or so children in Scotland, the reaction was to ban all handguns. I used to go bird shooting in England when my father was still alive (and paid for it-its frightfully expensive) and a Constable I met said gun crime has gone up but the Home Secretary can truthfully say that Britain no longer has ANY crime with LEGAL handguns (a comfort to all those victimized and defenseless in the face of thugs with ILLEGAL handguns)
 
TurtleDude said:
who knows, when a nut with a registered weapon killed 19 or so children in Scotland, the reaction was to ban all handguns. I used to go bird shooting in England when my father was still alive (and paid for it-its frightfully expensive) and a Constable I met said gun crime has gone up but the Home Secretary can truthfully say that Britain no longer has ANY crime with LEGAL handguns (a comfort to all those victimized and defenseless in the face of thugs with ILLEGAL handguns)
Yep, the very same thing happened in Australia.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom