- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Should homes that are gun free...have to post a sign?
Should homes that are gun free...have to post a sign?
No, of course not.
That's okay. I'll post one for them on my property with an arrow.
That's malicious.
Why???? What's malicious about the truth?
Should homes that are gun free...have to post a sign?
That's malicious.
Did you say that about the newspaper that published those addresses - I don't remember.
Should homes that are gun free...have to post a sign?
That's a stupid question.
I think it was the other way around, the newspaper posted gun owners homes. I don't recall weighing in on that issue here, but yes, that was also malicious.
Wouldn't that serve the purpose of creating a national gun registry by default? Too funny.
Wouldn't that serve the purpose of creating a national gun registry by default? Too funny.
Should homes that are gun free...have to post a sign?
LOL! For starters, how could possibly be forced to advertise a lack of an item? What's next Beware, no Dog here signs? Secondly, as someone who trembles in anger at the mere thought of a comprehensive database of gun owners, you might wanna think twice before forcing everyone who doesn't own a firearm from publicly advertising so. Good Thinkin'!NOpe, only those clowns who want to ban others from owning guns would be denied the coverage of the umbrella. People who don't own guns but do not wish to deny others that right would be not be uncovered. its only those hypocrites who don't want anyone owning guns gaining protection
LOL! For starters, how could possibly be forced to advertise a lack of an item? What's next Beware, no Dog here signs? Secondly, as someone who trembles in anger at the mere thought of a comprehensive database of gun owners, you might wanna think twice before forcing everyone who doesn't own a firearm from publicly advertising so. Good Thinkin'!
Because every household who doesn't own a firearm wants others to be defenseless. Again, some real top shelf reasoning there.I want criminals to target the homes of people who want others to be defenseless, not the homes of those who don't try to impose disarmament on others.
Not only would defining and quantifying these "banners" be impossible, your apparent desire to see a specific portion of the populace subjected to harm and violence is rather disturbing.You see, in gun free cities like Chicago, honest people live in fear of armed criminals. its time for the gun banners to get that experience
I want criminals to target the homes of people who want others to be defenseless, not the homes of those who don't try to impose disarmament on others.
You see, in gun free cities like Chicago, honest people live in fear of armed criminals. its time for the gun banners to get that experience
Because every household who doesn't own a firearm wants others to be defenseless. Again, some real top shelf reasoning there.
Not only would defining and quantifying these "banners" be impossible, your apparent desire to see a specific portion of the populace subjected to harm and violence is rather disturbing.
NOpe, only those clowns who want to ban others from owning guns would be denied the coverage of the umbrella. People who don't own guns but do not wish to deny others that right would be not be uncovered. its only those hypocrites who don't want anyone owning guns gaining protection
Because every household who doesn't own a firearm wants others to be defenseless. Again, some real top shelf reasoning there.
That's exactly what the very post you quoted DID NOT say.
You're both correct. My mistake. The idea that we could effectively determine what each individuals true intentions are when it comes to these issues is still quite naive, unless you'd just rely on the honor system.you obviously didn't read my posts before starting to complain
I said those who choose not to own guns but WHO DO NOT WISH TO DISARM others need not have such signs
Perhaps a better solution would be to invite those who believe that private citizens should not be allowed to carry concealed firearms to post such a sign, and then point out the hypocrisy when they refuse. The goal should be to get people to think about their position, not to make them the target of violent crime.