You skipped a step. You haven't yet proven I was incorrect.
Alternating your load AxBxAxB medium spread pellets for hallway coverage and high velocity, high density slugs for accuracy + knock back. I dont care if that crazie is wearing body armor that slug is going to do something, especially if you hit him in the head or a joint.
HIs failure is that I am honest about my motivations and catawba is trying to pretend that his suggestions are designed to make society safer when his real goal is to harass honest gun owners for not believing in the far left anti capitalist (and in many cases anti law and order) agenda he lives for
Dude you are wrong.
"Most types of semi-automatic pistols rely on a removable magazine to store ammunition before it is fired, usually inserted inside the grip."
Semi-automatic pistol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't think stripping law abiding people of their rights shows anything more than disgusting fascist tendencies
Do you even have a clue what “semi-automatic” means in this context?
Yes, it means you can shoot as fast as you can pull the trigger, and they usually accept high capacity mags.
"Dude", the discussion I responded to was about semi-automatic pistols.
You have provided only your opinion, "dude"!
You lied again. That is what you were responding to. I hear your credibility banging around in the basement as usual.
No... I have provided a fact. Fact the magazine AGAIN has nothing at all to do with a weapon being a single shot, semi-auto or full auto, period.
Wow your posts just boggle the imagination.
I call bull****! Link to where you have previously provided proof to me that most semi-automatic pistols do not rely on a removable magazine.
I did not say anything about "most" anything, nice strawman. All semiautomatic pistols can fire without any magazine at all. The magazine as I have stated does not have anything to do with the type of weapon it is.
I don't care if you don't believe me. You can remain in ignorance for all I care. I mean hell what would a military veteran and cop know about guns anyway.
You call bull****, LMAO! Oh man that is just so classic, it is sig worthy.
Thanks for your personal opinion, "dude"!
It's not my personal opinion man, it is a fact. You are just want to remain ignorant on the subject and talk out of your ass. That's cool with me man.
Like I said 12 years in the military and a cop, but what the hell do I know about guns.
A fact can be documented. You have provided only your opinion.
If I was wrong don't you think one of the gun nuts would have corrected me by now? You are just playing some silly game and you can't even see how ridicules you look trying to argue against reality.
Put up, or shot up!
well call up the US attorney and ask her. She is the chief law enforcement officer for the federal government in your judicial district
I know what Mine would say-and yours will say the same thing
I don't favor more gun control, first because of the 2nd amendment, and its importance, and secondly, because I don't believe it would have any effect on lessening violence in this culture. What we have is a cultural problem, not a gun problem.
According to the modern twist supplied by the gun lobby it well may be. According to the working definition employed at the time - it means nothing of the kind.
I have never advocated any measure by the government that would have it INFRINGED.
Other than an "assault" weapons ban?
And if you and I had wings we would not need cars.
A cop does NOT have the weapons they have because of the Second Amendment. Cops all over the world in all sorts of countries bear weapons in nations where people have no right to keep and bear arms. But they do it for the same reason as American cops do it - because it is part of the equipment needed to do the job.
where did I advocate that measure?
All I have advocated here is
1- a national discussion about the issue of the Second Amendment
2- building a memorial to the dead innocents
3- putting an armed police person in every school - which was then endorsed days later by Wayne La Pierre of the NRA
Those were my proposals.
There is no difference in the equipment they need to do their jobs and protect themselves then there is in the equipment needed to protect myself and my family. Firearms are not single purpose tools. The same firearm can be used in a number of roles.
For example, I can use a hammer to build a shed or to kill an intruder. See, more than one purpose. A tool is a tool.
No one is stripping anyone of their rights, if that were the case the USSC would have overturned the 1994 ban.
Police officers do not have the equipment they do because of their right to bear arms under the Second Amendment. They have the equipment and arms they do because of the job they do as designed by the peoples government.
To pretend that anyone can then claim that they have a right to the same equipment when they DO NOT do the same job and are NOT employed in that capacity by the peoples government is simply faulty thinking and has nothing at all to do with anyones Constitutional rights. You do not have any right to demand to match people because they have the use of something on their job.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?