• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guilt by association.

Logical1 said:
It seems you are unwilling to fact the absolute fact that so called peaceful protesters are enablers of the criminals, BECAUSE THEY ARE THERE.
Click to expand...



Then, in your "logic", so are LEO enablers, who to a certain extent "let" protesters "get away" with what may be illegal rather than enforce what they could if they so decided, because "they are there". The LEO are also enabling the outsiders and RW orgs that show up after curfew who may very well be the ones causing the great majority of damage, who are not actually protesting. But you can neither definitionally back up your "enabler" theory with any citation of fact nor provide evidence that it is the genuine protester who is the one causing damage to property. Without which, your claim is unfounded and need not be debated further for lack of proof, the burden of which is on you, the claim-maker. See you on another thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom