- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 28,852
- Reaction score
- 18,983
- Location
- SW Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I'm impressed by your logic and insightful comments. Might you be a US government conspiracy theory supporter?
imo this thread belongs in the CT forum.
To compare the London apartment fire to what happened on 9/11/2001 is a pathetic attempt to keep the controlled demolition explanation of the WTC1,2,7 alive.
"As a result of that, the design of tower blocks in the UK changed from about 1971 onwards. *From then on, the design had to allow for an explosion or a fire to remove part of the supporting structure and for the building to remain standing. ""
From the OP link.
Enjoy your evening good sir.
:roll: Jesus Almighty. Politicizing disaster and death.
Of course, mike, you see diversion as your job. And although you are not very good at all at it, you keep on truckin'.
And as usual, you make no sense at all. Because you know nothing of the science surrounding these types of events.
I'm glad you are impressed. Tell me all about the parallels between the two events you mentioned.
So you disagree with a source you provided.
Tru dat!
The real story is that when broken down, those 25.8 million trips overseas were taken by approximately just 13.3 million American residents. And that means that in total, the real number of Americans that actually traveled (took trips) overseas in 2009 for either business or leisure, was about 15.5 million —o r just five percent of our nation’s 311 million residents!
The Great American Passport Myth: Why Just 3.5% Of Us Travel Overseas! | HuffPost
I only disagree with the distortions that you always present, mike.
Present something and discuss it, in your own words, showing how it is relevant.
Really, Did you forget about the thousands of pounds of jet fuel??? ( basically diesel) do you have a clue on the energy release when this burned???? Think about this, has far does a single gallon of diesel propel a full size pickup?????? You obviously have no grasp on how some things work in life.....Grenfell Tower didn't collapse from hours long, raging fires. Only American exceptionalism can make steel framed high rises collapse from fires. That, and extraordinary US government lies, propaganda, fables, ... .
Grenfell Tower would have collapsed if built four years earlier, says expert
Grenfell Tower would have collapsed if built four years earlier, says expert
How could a direct quote be distorted? I quoted from your source you provided. The article explains why the tower did not collapse. If it wasn't for changed made in building code, it might have.
Really, Did you forget about the thousands of pounds of jet fuel??? ( basically diesel) do you have a clue on the energy release when this burned????
Your point being?
Really, Did you forget about the thousands of pounds of jet fuel??? ( basically diesel) do you have a clue on the energy release when this burned???? Think about this, has far does a single gallon of diesel propel a full size pickup?????? You obviously have no grasp on how some things work in life.....
Sent from my SM-G920R4 using Tapatalk
Quote Originally Posted by RetiredUSN
Venturing out of La La land is scary for some people.
That is why most Americans never travel outside the US.
You guys are not at all big on reality and facts.
Nowhere did I make the crazy assumptions that you have leaped to.
And for you, an obvious science denier who has come here to spread confusion, to suggest that you might have reviewed reams of data about anything to do with 911 is pure craziness. If you have ever appeared in any 911 thread, your offerings were as specious as this one.
evidently Grenfell tower was more structually[sic] sound then[sic] the WTC. I mean it's not like WTC was hit with an Airliner pulling in at 350 knots or anything.
Nano Scale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives
...
"Greater energy densities versus greater power—that's been the traditional trade-off," says Simpson. "With our new process, however, we're mixing at molecular scales, using grains the size of tens to hundreds of molecules. That can give us the best of both worlds-higher energy densities and high power as well."
https://str.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html
Another of the old canards/old wives tales/propaganda that is force fed to Americans everyday.
WTC towers were the strongest buildings in the world, designed to take the impact from a 707/DC8 traveling at 600 mph.
It's the US government developed, non-commercially available nanothermite found in WTC dust that brought down the towers, all three.
No, there was no thermite found in the WTC site, that's a lie.
regardless of the verbal declarations of designers, no engineering study on aircraft impact has been found, and the simple fact is, you can plan for the remote possibility a plane hits your tower,
John Skilling
John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center. In a 1993 interview, Skilling stated that the Towers were designed to withstand the impact and fires resulting from the collision of a large jetliner such as Boeing 707 or Douglas DC-8.
Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. 3
A white paper released on February 3, 1964 states that the Towers could have withstood impacts of jetliners travelling 600 mph -- a speed greater than the impact speed of either jetliner used on 9/11/01.
The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact. 4
9-11 Research: Towers' Design Parameters
As to your number 1 fantasy: The nanothermite found in WTC dust
A. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
B. 9/11: WTC Nanothermite chip vs Paint ignition by Mark Basile
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOzh5CbLqBw
C. Mark Basile Red Grey WTC Nanothermite Grey Side Unknown Usage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMIZ7pFNthw
=================================================
As to your number 2 fantasy: [bolding is mine]
I only disagree with the distortions that you always present, mike.
Present something and discuss it, in your own words, showing how it is relevant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?