Riveroaks
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,230
- Reaction score
- 2,084
- Location
- Peoples' Republic Of CALIF
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The following is a quote of former President/General Ulysses S. Grant's view of the cause of the U.S. Civil War, taken from his last chapter in his Memoirs published in 1885:
THE CAUSE of the great War Of The Rebellion against the United States will have to be attributed to slavery.
For some years before the war began, it was a trite saying among some politicians that "a state half slave and half free cannot exist" ... that all must become slave or all free, or the state will go down. I took no part myself in any such view of the case at the time, but since the War is over, reviewing the whole question, I have come to the conclusion that the saying is quite true.
Slavery was an institution that required unusual guarantees for its security wherever it existed. And in a country like ours where a larger portion of it was free territory inhabited by an intelligent and well to do population, the People would have but little sympathy with demands upon them for its protection.
Hence the people of the South were dependent upon keeping control of the general government to secure the perpetuation of their favorite institution. They were enabled to maintain this control for long after the States where slavery existed had ceased to have the controlling power, through the assistance they received from old men here and there throughout the Northern states. They saw their power waning, and this led them to encroach upon the prerogatives and independence of the Northern states by enacting such laws as The Fugitive Slave Law. By this law every Northern man was obliged when properly summoned to turn out and help apprehend the runaway slave of a Southern man. Northern marshals became slave catchers, and Northern courts had to contribute to the support and protection of the institution.
This was a degradation which the North would not permit any longer than they could get the power to expunge such laws from the statute books. Prior to the time of these encroachments, the great majority of the people of the North had no particular quarrel with slavery so long as they were not forced to have it themselves. But they were not willing to play the role of police for the South in the protection of this particular institution.
In the early days of this country, before we had railroads, telegraphs, and steamboats -- in a word rapid transit of any sort -- the States were each almost a separate nationality. At that time the subject of slavery caused but little or no disturbance to the public mind. But the country grew, rapid transit was established, and trade and commerce between the States got to be so much greater than before, that the power of the National Government became more felt and recognized and therefore had to be enlisted in the cause of this institution.
It is probably well that we had this War when we did. We are better off now than we would have been without it and have made more rapid progress than we otherwise would have made.
THE CAUSE of the great War Of The Rebellion against the United States will have to be attributed to slavery.
For some years before the war began, it was a trite saying among some politicians that "a state half slave and half free cannot exist" ... that all must become slave or all free, or the state will go down. I took no part myself in any such view of the case at the time, but since the War is over, reviewing the whole question, I have come to the conclusion that the saying is quite true.
Slavery was an institution that required unusual guarantees for its security wherever it existed. And in a country like ours where a larger portion of it was free territory inhabited by an intelligent and well to do population, the People would have but little sympathy with demands upon them for its protection.
Hence the people of the South were dependent upon keeping control of the general government to secure the perpetuation of their favorite institution. They were enabled to maintain this control for long after the States where slavery existed had ceased to have the controlling power, through the assistance they received from old men here and there throughout the Northern states. They saw their power waning, and this led them to encroach upon the prerogatives and independence of the Northern states by enacting such laws as The Fugitive Slave Law. By this law every Northern man was obliged when properly summoned to turn out and help apprehend the runaway slave of a Southern man. Northern marshals became slave catchers, and Northern courts had to contribute to the support and protection of the institution.
This was a degradation which the North would not permit any longer than they could get the power to expunge such laws from the statute books. Prior to the time of these encroachments, the great majority of the people of the North had no particular quarrel with slavery so long as they were not forced to have it themselves. But they were not willing to play the role of police for the South in the protection of this particular institution.
In the early days of this country, before we had railroads, telegraphs, and steamboats -- in a word rapid transit of any sort -- the States were each almost a separate nationality. At that time the subject of slavery caused but little or no disturbance to the public mind. But the country grew, rapid transit was established, and trade and commerce between the States got to be so much greater than before, that the power of the National Government became more felt and recognized and therefore had to be enlisted in the cause of this institution.
It is probably well that we had this War when we did. We are better off now than we would have been without it and have made more rapid progress than we otherwise would have made.