- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
- Messages
- 219
- Reaction score
- 88
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Karma's a bitch!
- I still wonder where the OP is finding justification in this story for making the inflammatory assertion that all Republicans are pedophiles?
Then I suggest you read the thread and it's several supporting links that just keeps growing. You can get your rocks off at all the right winger posts of Biden sniffing hair because to them, that is the same as all these child pedo's in the linked stories. When you are done, then maybe you can not lie about what is in the OP. The OP never said anything about "all republicans are pedophiles". But you have a worn out victim you feel you must play. I understand.
- I still wonder where the OP is finding justification in this story for making the inflammatory assertion that all Republicans are pedophiles?
To answer your question - if it quakes like a duck ....................The Deviants 'N Charge is jealous they didn't think of it first??
Couple questions:
- If the primary purpose of the bill is to establish a common-law marriage between "one man" and "one woman" - why is the focus instead on the fact that it's missing age limits? Make no mistake - I happen to agree that age limits are appropriate and should have been included, but what is the motive for the OP calling all Republicans pedophiles?
- Why is the dem's solution in the Tennessee legislature to throw the bill out entirely? Why not just insert age limits and move on? From my read of the article, there was no intent in leaving out age limits; when asked about the bill its author reiterated the bill's intent - “So, all this bill does is give an alternative form of marriage for those pastors and other individuals who have a conscientious objection to the current pathway to marriage in our law,” Leatherwood said. The author of the article however pressed on with his point, saying the bill opened the door for possible child marriages, to which its author admitted - “There is not an explicit age limit,” Leatherwood said. At which point the reasonable question to ask would be:
- Why did Leatherwood not include a specific age limit in the bill? We're not told. All we read are concerns and conjectures about "possible" issues and some inserted stats from UNICEF about marriages under the age of 18 and a statement from the Sexual Assault Center of Middle Tennessee - when the omission might have been entirely innocent, an oversight? But again, rather than simply insert an age limit into the bill and moving on, there's all this hullabaloo over something the legislature could easily edit, rather than "eliminated" as a "terrible bill." Doesn't it seem plausible there's some other reason for wanting to eliminate the bill -- besides a simple age limit that's so easily edited?
- I still wonder where the OP is finding justification in this story for making the inflammatory assertion that all Republicans are pedophiles?
South Dakota Senate Candidate Charged with Multiple Sexual Acts Against Adopted Child
Just days before the midterm elections, a Republican candidate for the South Dakota State Senate in next week’s election has been charged with child abuse. Joel M. Koskan was charged on Thursday for multiple sexual acts against his adopted daughter. Koskan’s challenger in the state senatorial...www.yahoo.com
Redneck hillbillies gonna redneck hillbilly..Look at the pedo party do their thing while they are always talking about protecting the children.
GOP bill would eliminate age requirements for marriages in Tennessee
A proposal making its way through the state legislature would establish a common-law marriage between “one man” and “one woman.” Opponents of the bill (HB 233) say it would eliminate an age r…www.wjhl.com