• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP plans wave of White House probes

I am reminded of a certain movie poster that could be applied to all kinds of things in politics. In this case, if the Republicans win the house as many seem to believe or if the Democrats keep the majority. If the Dems have it, the Republicans will think of new and creative ways to be dicks. If the Republicans have it, the Dems will do the same thing to the Republicans but, now the Republicans will waste a ****load of time trying to tear down any kind of progress made the past 2 years and needlessly probe into the White house. Oh and that poster? Here you guys go:

avp-poster-4.jpg

They are both predators. The only way one of them could be alien is if the birther nutters turn out to be right. LOL.
 
And Glenn Beck is honest, and Newsbusters is a reliable source.

I don't get it.... ... Has nothing to do with the topic, and quite possibly trolling.
 
What does this have to do with anything within the boundaries of the subject matter?

Is this like the default fall back retort or what? What Bush did or didn't do is irrelevant here.

Has everything to do with the subject matter. The dems did not start an investigation crazy when they took power, but now the Republican's are threatening to do so, which is highly hypocritical considering the crap pulled under the Republican watch during the Bush years.

IF the Republicans do go after the Dems, then I hope to god, that the Dems grow a pair and when they do return to power, and they will, then throw the kitchen sink against any Republican who was around during the Bush years. I hope they throw so many investigations against the Republicans that the Republican party will be neutered for years and we finally can see some actual policies come out of Washington other than obstructionist crap the Republicans have been pulling for the last 2 years.
 
Great, two years of distractions and running the country back into the ground.

The Dems have already run the country into the ground.

Personally, I would rather Congress spend more time on this crap and less time on new regulations that do nothing but make it harder to get out and make money.
 
Has everything to do with the subject matter. The dems did not start an investigation crazy when they took power, but now the Republican's are threatening to do so, which is highly hypocritical considering the crap pulled under the Republican watch during the Bush years.

IF the Republicans do go after the Dems, then I hope to god, that the Dems grow a pair and when they do return to power, and they will, then throw the kitchen sink against any Republican who was around during the Bush years. I hope they throw so many investigations against the Republicans that the Republican party will be neutered for years and we finally can see some actual policies come out of Washington other than obstructionist crap the Republicans have been pulling for the last 2 years.

Because there wasn't anything to investigate and they knew it. They knew all along that if they launched big fancy investigations of the Bush Administration, they would only end up looking like bigger dumb asses than they already do.
 
Please show where the Republicans had to bribe anybody to pass legislation.

It happens on both sides of the isle, every stinking day.

What, you've never heard of earmarks, or campaign contributions, or the corporate fronts used to launder otherwise illegal campaign donations? :lol:
 
Because there wasn't anything to investigate and they knew it. They knew all along that if they launched big fancy investigations of the Bush Administration, they would only end up looking like bigger dumb asses than they already do.

There was plenty of investigate if we go by the rule of thumb the Republicans seem to set down for these future "investigations".. Everything from Cheney and Haliburton to cherrypicking intelligence to justify the Iraq war, over to massive fraud in the occupation and so on and so on. Add to that, Ensign, and all the other corrupt Republicans past and present and well .. plenty to do.
 
2006: "If the Dems get elected, they'll drain the swamp of DC and put an end to the Republican culture of corruption. That's why they should win!"

2010: "If the Republicans get elected, they'll just start frivolous investigations and try to muck up the important work of government with their partisan probes. That's why they shouldn't win!"
 
2006: "If the Dems get elected, they'll drain the swamp of DC and put an end to the Republican culture of corruption. That's why they should win!"

2010: "If the Republicans get elected, they'll just start frivolous investigations and try to muck up the important work of government with their partisan probes. That's why they shouldn't win!"

Yep, Democrats definitely wasted all that time and effort with investigations into the Bush administration!
 
Yep, Democrats definitely wasted all that time and effort with investigations into the Bush administration!

I don't see how the Dems' failure to follow through helps your point.
 
if it proved to pay politically the party in power woulda probed

what issa seeks to uncover, in contrast, may turn out to be more interesting

stay tuned
 
It happens on both sides of the isle, every stinking day.

What, you've never heard of earmarks, or campaign contributions, or the corporate fronts used to launder otherwise illegal campaign donations? :lol:

I wish both sides really WERE on an isle and that isle would start sinking... :mrgreen:
 
Yeah, if this is their focus for the next 2 years if they get elected they can fully expect that all the ferver and support they are garnering now will vanish. People want them in and actually following through with conservative philosophy in policies, not playing like congress is Salem and they're out searching for witches.
 
Yeah, if this is their focus for the next 2 years if they get elected they can fully expect that all the ferver and support they are garnering now will vanish. People want them in and actually following through with conservative philosophy in policies, not playing like congress is Salem and they're out searching for witches.

Perhaps, but are you saying there are no inquiries that would be justified? Not one?
 
president obama has done so much damage to his party and other prominent elements of his base, if something ugly is indeed uncovered and takes off as a subject of hot and hurtful discussion...
 
GOP Vows Crackdown on Controversies If Party Wins House

Wait just a darn minute are they saying Obama, the Radicals in the Administration, and other Liberal wackos in Congress have been less than transparent and honest?

Well I sure hope this comes to pass. We might actually find out who Obama really is, so to speak

http://http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/04/gop-vows-ramp-investigations-obama-administration-wins-house/
If Republicans regain control of the House in November, some have vowed to launch investigations into controversies that Democrats have tried to ignore, including the New Black Panther voter intimidation case and the activities of the community activist group ACORN.

"It's very clear that House Republicans are going to use their oversight powers when they elected. There's no question about it," said GOP strategist Ron Bonjean who is a former Capitol Hill aide.
 
Last edited:
Moderator's Warning:
Threads merged
 
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa’s first subpoena takes aim at Countrywide Financial’s VIP program, launching a probe that seeks to out lawmakers who got sweetheart terms on home loans. The California Republican issued an unusually wide-ranging subpoena for documents about the defunct lender’s program, demanding names, addresses and e-mail exchanges of all those involved, a major expansion of an inquiry launched in the preceding Congress.

In the 111th Congress, then-Chairman Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) limited his inquiry into the Friends of Angelo Program — named for former Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo — to government officials, regulators and their aides. This time, the broad request could also net private individuals mentioned in internal Countrywide e-mail traffic. The chairman, primarily, wants information on borrowers who were a “current or former member, officer or employee of the U.S. Congress; a current or former officer or employee of a government-sponsored enterprise; or a current or former officer or employee of a state and local government.”

Issa said in a statement that the American people “have a right to know the totality of who participated in the Countrywide VIP program and what they did in return for access to it.” He said it is Congress’s role to “get all of the facts so that the American people can judge for themselves who should be held responsible and accountable. “Countrywide orchestrated a deliberate and calculated effort to use relationships with people in high places in order to manipulate public policy and further their bottom line to the detriment of the American taxpayers, even at the expense of its own lending standards,” Issa said.

Darrell Issa?s first subpoena targets Countrywide VIP Program - Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com

can you possibly manufacture an objection to the california conservative's scrutiny of the foa's?

is there any reason senators and reps should be excluded?

is "collegiality" a credible cause for their exclusion?

spin, anyone?
 
I give up. The republicans in this country are amazing. They have completely control over their constituency, constantly apply pressure to liberals, and attack with reckless abandon.

It's almost indefensible. It's okay to distract the POTUS and waste tax payer money on investigating a blow job, but there is no reason to attack a war based on WMD that everyone knew didn't exist? What is there possibly to investigate about with this administration? That they bargain far too much with conservatives that bully them around and act like school children when they lose?

Unbelievable.
 
there's little doubt that this admin has been a foe of foia

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is demanding two Homeland Security employees appear in front of his committee’s staff to talk about Freedom of Information practices, the first subpoena that directly targets the Obama administration.

The request comes as the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Issa is the chairman, investigates whether DHS employees allow political interference when dealing with FOIA requests . People close to the committee say Issa has whistleblower documents that prove such activity occurs. His first subpoena went to Countrywide Financial.

Darrell Issa subpoenas DHS officials - Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com

openness is another of obama's opaque promises

White House meets lobbyists off campus - Chris Frates - POLITICO.com

indeed, the making public of white house logs was the first obstruction of foia we all witnessed

why all the hiding?
 
more obstruction, now bipartisan

Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) told POLITICO on Wednesday that he will be co-sponsoring the legislation from House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) that puts a freeze on EPA's regulatory agenda for major industrial polluters like power plants and petroleum refiners.

"The EPA needs to be reined in," said Peterson, the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee and a frequent critic of the agency.

House Democrat to co-sponsor bill to 'rein in' EPA - Darren Samuelsohn - POLITICO.com

considering the party's near 50-50 split this week over appropriations, it appears boehner will have little trouble peeling off a significant slice of dems

upstairs, uber lib jay rockefeller has been a loud proponent of stripping epa, and presumably fellow west virginian joe manchin in bobby byrd's seat will put a bullet in rockefeller's rifle

fyi
 
With all due respect this quite ill informed.

Every major Nation's Intel believed he (Saddam) had them.

EVERY Dem thought he had them inlubing Bill and Hill...seriously, you need to be more informed.

I give up. The republicans in this country are amazing. They have completely control over their constituency, constantly apply pressure to liberals, and attack with reckless abandon.

It's almost indefensible. It's okay to distract the POTUS and waste tax payer money on investigating a blow job, but there is no reason to attack a war based on WMD that everyone knew didn't exist? What is there possibly to investigate about with this administration? That they bargain far too much with conservatives that bully them around and act like school children when they lose?

Unbelievable.
 
Let me save the GOP the effort: Barack Obama is indeed black. Impeachment is therefore a foregone conclusion.
 
Back
Top Bottom