- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Sorry bub, not letting you get away with what IS actually intellectual fraud, what you are doing...here is my original post with the definition of both felon and convicted felon as copied and pasted from Wikipedia.
No periods, a comma separating the two separate definitions as one is for felon and one is for convicted felon. Easy for even a 4th grader to read properly and generally understand. That would put you at below 4th grade reading level. Both uses of "is" should have alerted you to different circumstances leading to different identifications of felon versus convicted felon. Doing crime at the level of a felony makes you a felon and upon conviction for that crime you are a convicted felon.
And to answer your other question, if you commit a crime at the level of a felony, you are a felon, whether plea bargained out, not indicted, or even if only God knew, you are still a felon by definition if you commit a felony level crime.
Lord, one can understand only getting to a third grade level of reading comprehension... teachers have other students in the class that need attention... the amount of one on one time is not generally there to be spent... and with not getting it over and over and over and over... perhaps one can only reach the 3rd grade level. I know it is not your fault if you truly cannot understand, but a bit frustrating on this end as to its utter simplicity.
Then why did YOU insert a period where a comma was suppose to be and tried to dishonestly pass it off as a complete sentence and end of the definition?
Your answer on knowing I am a felon makes no sense at all. If I do not even know if I am a felon - how in the world can anybody else know?
And if nobody knows how is it that the label is there at all since nobody including me knows it is there?
Your answer makes no sense in the real world.
This is just another right winger trying to vomit up far right wing talking points and getting aroused calling Clinton a felon.
Its pathetic and anyone who does it - and then goes to the fraudulent lengths you are going to here - is even more sad.
Your definition is so over broad and so without any real world limits or qualifiers that it is meaningless as anyone in the entire world of adult age could well be a FELON - even if they or nobody else knows it and that makes it just plain useless as a label and as a word to identify anyone.
Words are suppose to convey meaning ... they mean something .... and the way you define them robs them of their meaning rendering them so broad and without any identifying character as to render them useless.
Last edited: