• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Goldman Sachs: A Democratic sweep would mean faster economic recovery (1 Viewer)

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
106,052
Reaction score
96,452
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent


Wall Street does its homework and predicts that a "Democratic sweep" on November 3rd will lead to a much faster and a more comprehensive economic recovery than if Donald Trump were to win reelection.
 
The economy typically does much better under the democrats.

This isn't really related (or even a sample size), but I suppose it could be. I voted yesterday in person and asked my mother if she wanted to go with me to vote. She is an evangelical christian and a lifelong Republican. She told me no, I'm going to sit this one out. She can't bring herself to vote for Biden, and she see's the behavior of Trump as absolutely horrible. But, the fact she wouldn't go to vote for the other Republican candidates literally shocked me. She is 88 by the way, but plenty sharp.
 
Is there any surprise to this? For the last thirty years, economies improve under Democratic Presidents and worsen under Republican ones.
 
Is there any surprise to this? For the last thirty years, economies improve under Democratic Presidents and worsen under Republican ones.
and the people on the right can't see this for some reason.
the mess Bush left Obama is just one example , and IF Bush had stayed on the path Clinton had us on we wouldn't have such a high debt
Have a nice day
 
Satan being on your side isn't exactly sexy but I get it.
 
Somehow it shocks republicans that giving people money that they would otherwise already have to spend is good for the economy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…