- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 16,386
- Reaction score
- 7,793
- Location
- Where I am now
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: "God told me to shoot him, so I did."
A) "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The fact that the entire point of the 2'nd Amendment is CLEARLY the militia (the military) makes my point very much founded on a factural basis...that is the ONLY thing it is based on. Nowhere in the amendment does it even hint at people owning guns for reasons like to protect their homes from burglars. It talks about a) the military; and b) the Free state (the country/states).
Back then the military WAS the masses and their guns. Because back then, the founding fathers were not as moronic as today's leaders in this regard. They rightly kept the military very small but with a huge reserves (the militia). Now, they have the moronic idea of keeping a gigantic military that the nation cannot afford and is totally unnecessary. This is - of course - because idiotic/emotionally disturbed neocons dominate the government behind the scenes.
Everyone HAD to own guns so that they could bring their guns to battle when the nation mobilized the army.
Anyone with a remotely clear mind on this and just half common sense should (imo) clearly see that the 2'nd Amendment was CLEARLY just to do with the military...and nothing else.
That is fact as clearly spelled out by the words of the amendment.
It is the courts that have chosen to interpret these words in ways that do not honor the obvious meaning so that these idiot judges can have the guns they so desperately want to have. You will never see or talk to a more rabid bunch of salivating egomaniacs as when you talk to rabid gun lovers. They are totally closed-minded, egotistical, arrogant and illogical in their passion to the point of emotional instability on this issue.
They may be logical otherwise. But talk about taking away their guns and they start growling and salivating like how I assume child molestors act while sitting in a car outside of a pre-school. They are totally beyond logic and reason. The 'cold dead hands' insanity.
And B) your second point about my interpretation does not apply to anyone else is - no offense - ridiculous as you cannot possible know what every, single other American/human thinks about this and whether their interpretation is or is not similar to mine.
And, btw, I happen to know of many people who have expressed very similar views to my own on this matter.
Good day.
Just because one choses to make something one's business does not validate it IS one's business.
You are free to personally believe whatever you want. As I've stated over and over, the right to keep and bear arms is not a requirement any individual must personally adhere to. I personally have no firearms. You don't have to have any firearms. But anyone who chooses to keep and bear arms has the right to.
As far as your "interpretation" that the right pertains only to the militia which you somehow erroneously boil down to only those who are military veterans? You have a right to believe whatever you want and practice it personally. However, your belief is unfounded on any factual basis or understanding of the history of this constitutional protection, and your personal interpretation notwithstanding...does not apply to anyone other than yourself. :shrug:
A) "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The fact that the entire point of the 2'nd Amendment is CLEARLY the militia (the military) makes my point very much founded on a factural basis...that is the ONLY thing it is based on. Nowhere in the amendment does it even hint at people owning guns for reasons like to protect their homes from burglars. It talks about a) the military; and b) the Free state (the country/states).
Back then the military WAS the masses and their guns. Because back then, the founding fathers were not as moronic as today's leaders in this regard. They rightly kept the military very small but with a huge reserves (the militia). Now, they have the moronic idea of keeping a gigantic military that the nation cannot afford and is totally unnecessary. This is - of course - because idiotic/emotionally disturbed neocons dominate the government behind the scenes.
Everyone HAD to own guns so that they could bring their guns to battle when the nation mobilized the army.
Anyone with a remotely clear mind on this and just half common sense should (imo) clearly see that the 2'nd Amendment was CLEARLY just to do with the military...and nothing else.
That is fact as clearly spelled out by the words of the amendment.
It is the courts that have chosen to interpret these words in ways that do not honor the obvious meaning so that these idiot judges can have the guns they so desperately want to have. You will never see or talk to a more rabid bunch of salivating egomaniacs as when you talk to rabid gun lovers. They are totally closed-minded, egotistical, arrogant and illogical in their passion to the point of emotional instability on this issue.
They may be logical otherwise. But talk about taking away their guns and they start growling and salivating like how I assume child molestors act while sitting in a car outside of a pre-school. They are totally beyond logic and reason. The 'cold dead hands' insanity.
And B) your second point about my interpretation does not apply to anyone else is - no offense - ridiculous as you cannot possible know what every, single other American/human thinks about this and whether their interpretation is or is not similar to mine.
And, btw, I happen to know of many people who have expressed very similar views to my own on this matter.
Good day.
Last edited: