I chronically hear Christians say that God would never command people to go against his word... I really can't believe people that know scripture hold on to that belief... it's easily proven False yet the myth remains strangely prevalent.
God says thou shall not kill and then orders the Israelites to kill many people including women, children, and babies that were without sin.
I chronically hear Christians say that God would never command people to go against his word... I really can't believe people that know scripture hold on to that belief... it's easily proven False yet the myth remains strangely prevalent.
God says thou shall not kill and then orders the Israelites to kill many people including women, children, and babies that were without sin.
Here is an example:
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth:
Numbers 21:9 ►
So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, they lived.
God commanded Moses to do the exact opposite of what he formerly commanded.
Not to mention, it looks a bit satanic.
God can do whatever he wants to.
God can and has had people do the opposite of what scripture says. The first Christians did the opposite of what the Mosaic law commands. Yet Jesus said he came not to abolish the law or remove one word from the law. God changes his mind a lot
So, if the RC does something that the Bible says not to do, who knows if it was actually inspired by God? Since God has a reputation for commanding people to go against his word, I wouldn't put it past him to be responsible for the decisions of the church councils
The Bible alone Doctrine is built on a premise that blows itself up! The Bible alone is all that is needed to prove that the Bible alone is not the sole rule of sacred theology!
https://christianforums0101.createa...d-commands-disobedience-to-his-word/msg4/#new
God never said do not kill, He said do not Murder, big difference.I chronically hear Christians say that God would never command people to go against his word... I really can't believe people that know scripture hold on to that belief... it's easily proven False yet the myth remains strangely prevalent.
God says thou shall not kill and then orders the Israelites to kill many people including women, children, and babies that were without sin.
Here is an example:
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth:
Numbers 21:9 ►
So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, they lived.
God commanded Moses to do the exact opposite of what he formerly commanded.
Not to mention, it looks a bit satanic.
God can do whatever he wants to.
God can and has had people do the opposite of what scripture says. The first Christians did the opposite of what the Mosaic law commands. Yet Jesus said he came not to abolish the law or remove one word from the law. God changes his mind a lot
So, if the RC does something that the Bible says not to do, who knows if it was actually inspired by God? Since God has a reputation for commanding people to go against his word, I wouldn't put it past him to be responsible for the decisions of the church councils
The Bible alone Doctrine is built on a premise that blows itself up! The Bible alone is all that is needed to prove that the Bible alone is not the sole rule of sacred theology!
https://christianforums0101.createa...d-commands-disobedience-to-his-word/msg4/#new
The contradictions only arise because of the ignorance of he who thinks there are contraindications.
For example, "Thou shall not kill" is a translation of the Hebrew that's a bit off. More correct would be "thou shall not murder" meaning unjustified killing.
"Thou shall not make graven images" refers to images of gods. An ordinary snake would be fair game.
If you are looking to make what others believe look silly it's easy to do because most other people are ignorant as well, but it's a pretty hateful thing to do.
When non-believers attempt to interpret scripture they just make a hash of it.
God says thou shall not kill and then orders the Israelites to kill many people including women, children, and babies that were without sin.
The REALITY is that nobody living knows what the intent or exact literal interpretation of scripture is.
The OP said :
Your response was the bolded above.
So having the Israelites "kill many people including women, children, and babies " is not murder. Because it is justified
I would love to hear the justification for killing the babies of people you go to war with.
Nowadays we would call that genocide.
The OP said :
Your response was the bolded above.
So having the Israelites "kill many people including women, children, and babies " is not murder. Because it is justified
I would love to hear the justification for killing the babies of people you go to war with.
Nowadays we would call that genocide.
But not "murder", so it's ok.
The OP said :
Your response was the bolded above.
So having the Israelites "kill many people including women, children, and babies " is not murder. Because it is justified
I would love to hear the justification for killing the babies of people you go to war with.
Nowadays we would call that genocide.
"King Saul, kill ALL the Amalekites."
"Well I killed all of them except these few."
"Sorry that you and your son and several thousand of My people died defending themselves the Amalekites (not to mention all the children they killed as sacrifices to their gods.)"
Yes, sometimes you have to kill bad people to protect those you love. But you're not interested in facts like this, you're only interest is to engage in cherry-picking scripture, based on your lack of study of the Bible (thinking that just reading it is enough, instead of actually studying the full meaning and cultural and historical context). But making an effort to actually know what you're talking about would just get in the way of your hate....
Who gets to determine who the "bad" people are that deserve to be killed?
God? And then he does what ..? Sends a text message?
The contradictions only arise because of the ignorance of he who thinks there are contraindications.
For example, "Thou shall not kill" is a translation of the Hebrew that's a bit off. More correct would be "thou shall not murder" meaning unjustified killing.
"Thou shall not make graven images" refers to images of gods. An ordinary snake would be fair game.
If you are looking to make what others believe look silly it's easy to do because most other people are ignorant as well, but it's a pretty hateful thing to do.
When non-believers attempt to interpret scripture they just make a hash of it.
My point being,
don't critize Catholics for what they do in their devotions to Saints. All you have is an OT verse that condemns seeking out wizards, mediums, and powers of the occult. The apostles in acts chapter 15 did the opposite of what scripture said and decided the mosaic law no longer needed to be followed with circumcision. God changes his mind. What is formerly forbidden becomes permitted.
As the Church authority, the Apostles made decisions that totally went against the scripture of the time. The first Christians were not Bible Christians.
Don't use the Old Testament to attack Catholics because the OT says a lot of bizzare things like kill people for working on the wrong day of the week.
I chronically hear Christians say that God would never command people to go against his word... I really can't believe people that know scripture hold on to that belief... it's easily proven False yet the myth remains strangely prevalent.
God says thou shall not kill and then orders the Israelites to kill many people including women, children, and babies that were without sin.
Here is an example:
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth:
Numbers 21:9 ►
So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, they lived.
God commanded Moses to do the exact opposite of what he formerly commanded.
Not to mention, it looks a bit satanic.
God can do whatever he wants to.
God can and has had people do the opposite of what scripture says. The first Christians did the opposite of what the Mosaic law commands. Yet Jesus said he came not to abolish the law or remove one word from the law. God changes his mind a lot
So, if the RC does something that the Bible says not to do, who knows if it was actually inspired by God? Since God has a reputation for commanding people to go against his word, I wouldn't put it past him to be responsible for the decisions of the church councils
The Bible alone Doctrine is built on a premise that blows itself up! The Bible alone is all that is needed to prove that the Bible alone is not the sole rule of sacred theology!
https://christianforums0101.createa...d-commands-disobedience-to-his-word/msg4/#new
The contradictions only arise because of the ignorance of he who thinks there are contraindications.
For example, "Thou shall not kill" is a translation of the Hebrew that's a bit off. More correct would be "thou shall not murder" meaning unjustified killing.
"Thou shall not make graven images" refers to images of gods. An ordinary snake would be fair game.
If you are looking to make what others believe look silly it's easy to do because most other people are ignorant as well, but it's a pretty hateful thing to do.
When non-believers attempt to interpret scripture they just make a hash of it.
Yes, God does that. He created everything and can dispose of everything, including the puerile, peevish virtue signalling we get from so many pinheads these days.
Then don't blame catholics for having statues...those statues aren't Gods, neither is the adoration that belongs to God supposed to be given to anything less than God
So, in other words, you have no argument.
That is the argument. Sorry if you missed it.
No. That was a rant ending in an ad hom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?