• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Global Warming!!

SgtNeo

New member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
There is not enough evidence to support global warming. My concern is that this issue has become such a political debate between people when there is no critical evidence of this matter.

What about the ozon? What about the chemicals floating around us? What about nations playing God and creating new geological places around the world? What about people hunting for game? What about all those americans that probably dumb their F$%cking oil into the ground?

Why focus on a issue that isn't as significant as these others?
 

I agree. Hunting for game is much more significant. Opening day is just around the corner and its time to start getting ready for hunting season !!
 
There is not enough evidence to support global warming. My concern is that this issue has become such a political debate between people when there is no critical evidence of this matter.

No offense, but when you're that uniformed about Climate issues why post here in this forum. Sure, there are number partisan hacks not the least bit interested in the decades of peer-reviewed evidence who love it when a newbie shows up to be counted as one of them, but do a little personal research, check your sources, ask logical questions about who is more credible, then come and read your post.
 
For scientists to stand their and say that .6 degree celsius increase is abnormal by comparing it to the past 100 years of documented climate changes.

We live in a very advance eco system where scientists haven't even scratched the surface yet.

Most of the earth's land mass is located in the northern hemisphere, as is most of the earth's vegetation. During autumn and winter, millions of tons of leaves fall fall from deciduous trees and as they decompose, they give off carbon dioxide. The trees themselves no longer process as much carbon dioxide as they are in somewhat of a dormant state. As a consequence, the earth's carbon dioxide levels rise.

Throughout the spring and summer days, leaves grow rapidly and a great deal of carbon dioxide is consumed in the growing of the leaves and subsequent normal respiration processes - so the CO2 level drops.
 

You don't want him to decide who's more credible, you want him to wear blinders.

The credible side the side that doesn't wet their pants over minor cyclical climate variations, especially when the cycle for at least the last half-decade denies the theories you people have been praying over.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…