• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Global Warming is Worse than we Thought

Quaestio said:
Principia Scientific International? LOL! That's a new low even for you Jack. Do you not know who they are?
Click to expand...

I don't care if it was written by a pink monkey, if the argument is correct it wins.
 
Quaestio said:
Principia Scientific International? LOL! That's a new low even for you Jack. Do you not know who they are?
Click to expand...

"Who they are" doesn't matter in the slightest. You should have reviewed the thread before you post because PSI is on the right side of this one. Here's the money quote:

Resplandy now has a statement on her website: resplandy.princeton.edu
“We are aware the way we handled the errors underestimated the uncertainties. We are working on an update that addresses this issue. We thank Nicholas Lewis for bringing this to our attention.”
 
Jack Hays said:
"Who they are" doesn't matter in the slightest. You should have reviewed the thread before you post because PSI is on the right side of this one.
Click to expand...
Tim the plumber said:
I don't care if it was written by a pink monkey, if the argument is correct it wins.
Click to expand...

They're a tiny bunch of looney cranks who are Sky Dragon Slayers. They don't accept the physics and overwhelming evidence/observations of the earth's natural 'greenhouse' effect. They are equivalent to flat earthers.
 
Quaestio said:
They're a tiny bunch of looney cranks who are Sky Dragon Slayers. They don't accept the physics and overwhelming evidence/observations of the earth's natural 'greenhouse' effect. They are equivalent to flat earthers.
Click to expand...

Fully irrelevant in the thread where their link was posted. They were right and Nature was wrong.
 
Jack Hays said:
Fully irrelevant in the thread where their link was posted. They were right and Nature was wrong.
Click to expand...

That's right Jack. You stick up for those Sky Dragon Slayer cranks from PSI.

We already know you think Sky Dragon Slayer Tim Ball posts 'accurate' graphs with faked labeling showing the global average temperature is MINUS 32C. If you can swallow that you can swallow anything.
 

That post is simply a falsehood.
 
Quaestio said:
They're a tiny bunch of looney cranks who are Sky Dragon Slayers. They don't accept the physics and overwhelming evidence/observations of the earth's natural 'greenhouse' effect. They are equivalent to flat earthers.
Click to expand...

Then you can quote from their argument and show why it is wrong.

Should be easy.
 
Jack Hays said:
That post is simply a falsehood.
Click to expand...

The thread still exists. If I could be bothered I'd go find it and post a link. But you're not worth the time.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Then you can quote from their argument and show why it is wrong.

Should be easy.
Click to expand...

{Pffft} They're like flat earther kooks. Why would you think I'd want to waste my time?
 
Quaestio said:
{Pffft} They're like flat earther kooks. Why would you think I'd want to waste my time?
Click to expand...

Well, if you don't show why they are wrong I, and any other reader will presume you are unable to do so.
 
Quaestio said:
The thread still exists. If I could be bothered I'd go find it and post a link. But you're not worth the time.
Click to expand...

Your claim was false then and it's false now. I'm struck by how desperate you are to deflect from Resplandy et al going down in flames.
 
Jack Hays said:
Your claim was false then and it's false now. I'm struck by how desperate you are to deflect from Resplandy et al going down in flames.
Click to expand...

So you remember the thread? Good times. I hadn't laughed so hard in a long time. Global temperature of MINUS 32C! LOL! And you swallowed it hook line and sinker.
 
Quaestio said:
So you remember the thread? Good times. I hadn't laughed so hard in a long time. Global temperature of MINUS 32C! LOL! And you swallowed it hook line and sinker.
Click to expand...

I use the word "falsehood" because it is more polite than "lie."
 
Crickets and deflections from the AGW crowd. The remaining question is whether there will be an attempt to revive the Resplandy et al​ corpse, or whether it will be retracted. Stay tuned.
 
Jack Hays said:
Crickets and deflections from the AGW crowd. The remaining question is whether there will be an attempt to revive the Resplandy et al​ corpse, or whether it will be retracted. Stay tuned.
Click to expand...

From what I see, climate scientists don’t think the error significantly changes the main results.

Deniers and their blogs differ, as do their shills.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…