• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Glenn Beck: Nothing but Lies?

But that same argument can be used by anything not Glenn Beck. Even then, people like Olbermann, Matthews, Schultz, Malloy, and Maddow don't even advise people to do their own research. At least that way critical people like me can research such facts.

Furthermore, I ask that people stop saying that other people would just look up partisan hack websites. Any true critical person would avoid such sites, try to find factual evidence, and then reason internally on such facts and notions.


Right. This is why I despise the lot of them. Many viewers are too lazy to find the truth and willing accept whatever these propagandists say. And no one does it better than Glenn. He is the master of spin and drama and so many fall for his idiotic claims.

PS. Why did you just mention all lefty commentators (the ones with the lower ratings and are mostly irrelevant)? Do you not think that Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh are just as guilty?
 
Glenn has a tendency to take nuggets of information and spin them more than a top. I am pretty sure that he could devise a theory that Mother Theresa was an evil and vile woman if he wanted to. That's what he does. And if one of his disciples ever has a moment of wanting to "look it up," I am sure Google can find some remote idiotic blog written by some crazy in mom's basement that contains similar theories.

That is Glenn Beck.
corrected below... you're welcome.


[insert any liberal/conservative tv host here] has a tendency to take nuggets of information and spin them more than a top. I am pretty sure that he/she could devise a theory that Mother Theresa was an evil and vile woman if he/she wanted to. That's what he/she does. And if one of his/her disciples ever has a moment of wanting to "look it up," I am sure Google can find some remote idiotic blog written by some crazy in mom's basement that contains similar theories.

That is [insert any liberal/conservative tv host here]
 
Right. This is why I despise the lot of them. Many viewers are too lazy to find the truth and willing accept whatever these propagandists say. And no one does it better than Glenn. He is the master of spin and drama and so many fall for his idiotic claims.

PS. Why did you just mention all lefty commentators (the ones with the lower ratings and are mostly irrelevant)? Do you not think that Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh are just as guilty?

The issue is Beck. He states to "do your own research." The others I don't believe I've heard say such, from both sides. Besides, what better liberal talking heads do you have than the ones I posted?

Also, every single one of us are biased because we all were raised and influenced by others. To claim one is not biased is a factual impossibility.
 
The man creates a masterful fabric of logical fallacies to prop up and paint the image that he wants others to see, this image (which is usually extrapolated from the smallest nugget of truth) tends to get so distorted and manipulated through his fallacious ramblings that it is not even reality anymore.

Here is a link to an excellently done, very thorough (and very long) dissection of a snippet of Becks dialogue. It strips the facade off from his oratory and shows it for what it is - a masterfully crafted pile of logical fallacies used to convey a distorted message. A similar dissection could be done to literally everything the man says, should one have the impetus or the time. Beck is a case study in fallacious arguments (and I am sure this is deliberate on his and/or his staffs part, I give him credit, he is a freaking genius as a snake oil salesman)

http://www.debatepolitics.com/general-political-discussion/58327-beck-exposes-another-communist-lover-obama-white-house.html#post1058310323
 
Last edited:
Ok, so we all agree that both liberal and conservative propagandists suck.

Well, I prefer Michael Savage because he wears his emotions, thoughts, and beliefs on his sleeve. Basically, he's not reserved and, well, weasel-ish like others from both sides. Savage is bold and honest, hence why a lot of people do and don't like him. He's not afraid to speak his mind or be sneaky. People that are bold and openly honest I prefer because I can more easily glimpse the true nature of that soul.
 
Well, I prefer Michael Savage because he wears his emotions, thoughts, and beliefs on his sleeve. Basically, he's not reserved and, well, weasel-ish like others from both sides. Savage is bold and honest, hence why a lot of people do and don't like him. He's not afraid to speak his mind or be sneaky. People that are bold and openly honest I prefer because I can more easily glimpse the true nature of that soul.

sneaky is NOT bold and openly honest.
 
The issue is Beck. He states to "do your own research." The others I don't believe I've heard say such, from both sides. Besides, what better liberal talking heads do you have than the ones I posted?

Also, every single one of us are biased because we all were raised and influenced by others. To claim one is not biased is a factual impossibility.

Good Lord, Wake, you didn't address a damn thing I pointed out. :doh

Based-on your responses here, it's easy to deduct that you are indeed a Beck follower. Good luck to you... you're going to need it.
 
I do know that he fake cried a few times, and that's a sizable "no-no" in my book. If you're honestly going to cry, then cry. But if it's fake, and I understand them as fake, then we have an issue. I like honest emotion, not fakeness.

Some issue have merit imo. I was at my college and watching one of his shows and he stated that words like "caveman, chairman" and such were being stripped out of textbooks from a state that I cannot recall---the issue stuck in my mind, though. I also heard that certain school lunch foods were being banned but again I don't recall the setting---I don't recall the location and the names of the schools. Issues like those can easily be researched, I can imagine.
 
sneaky is NOT bold and openly honest.

I don't see where I made the comparison. In fact, I agree with this sentence. ?

Good Lord, Wake, you didn't address a damn thing I pointed out. :doh

Based-on your responses here, it's easy to deduct that you are indeed a Beck follower. Good luck to you... you're going to need it.

I relook at your post since you want me too. Also, don't lie about me. I told all of you that I rarely watch Beck because I don't have cable. I also don't have much time. I'm not a Beck follower; didn't you read my OP??? o_O"
 
I do know that he fake cried a few times, and that's a sizable "no-no" in my book. If you're honestly going to cry, then cry. But if it's fake, and I understand them as fake, then we have an issue. I like honest emotion, not fakeness.

Some issue have merit imo. I was at my college and watching one of his shows and he stated that words like "caveman, chairman" and such were being stripped out of textbooks from a state that I cannot recall---the issue stuck in my mind, though. I also heard that certain school lunch foods were being banned but again I don't recall the setting---I don't recall the location and the names of the schools. Issues like those can easily be researched, I can imagine.

Let me repeat it one more time.

Beck takes factual information and spins it to suit him. He takes a mole hill and creates a mountain out of it. I don't know ho much I can make it clearer.
 
Last edited:
The only bias I see is maybe a little bias toward socialists and communists. I guess that could be a problem for some.

I watched his show a few nights ago and I couldn't stand the communist theories.. It made me feel it was 1984 and we were in the Cold War again.
 
Right. This is why I despise the lot of them. Many viewers are too lazy to find the truth and willing accept whatever these propagandists say. And no one does it better than Glenn. He is the master of spin and drama and so many fall for his idiotic claims.

PS. Why did you just mention all lefty commentators (the ones with the lower ratings and are mostly irrelevant)? Do you not think that Hannity, Savage, Limbaugh are just as guilty?

I take it this is the post you meant. Alright, let's analyze.

Quite frankly I despise them to one extent or another, besides Savage. He has some facets I disagree with but not much. Both talking heads besides Savage from both sides I either dislike or am not too interested in. However, I do sympathize with some points from my side. Take Hannity for example. I don't even know him or watch his show. What I do know is that he has some similar views to mine. I can dislike Hannity or be disinterested in his show, yet still agree with certain general concepts.

Many viewers are lazy and stupid. I'm not that type of person. Thus why I debate my hardest to make mistakes and learn from them. To know what is and isn't. To take the fragments I create and re-examine them. I don't take things for face value. Even now I dislike socialism and communism, but I want to study, learn, and understand them to get a better understanding. That's not lazy; if you think I am like that, then you're mistaken. Otherwise, I'd be disagreeing with everything you're saying and blindly defending Beck with everything I've got.

You're biased, Beck's biased, we're all biased. You can say he's a master of deceit, but others could call him an a master of truth. Me, I call him Harry.
 
Let me repeat it one more time.

Beck takes factual information and spins it to suit him. He take a mole hill and creates a mountain out of it. I don't know ho much I can make it clearer.

You could say that, and I can agree because that's what Beck does on his opinion show... But I could just as easily say that about every freaking opinion show out there. I could be biased and even hateful against all of them and state that every sincle one of those weasels are masters of twisting and spinning deceit. They're all sneaky spiders, I could say.
 
I watched his show a few nights ago and I couldn't stand the communist theories.. It made me feel it was 1984 and we were in the Cold War again.

I didn't see it. I probably se his show about once every month or two. Easily, I can agree and aympathize with his views, yet dislike, be critical, and be annoyed with the person conveying those views.
 
Whenever Glenn Beck tells you what liberals think/believe, he's lying to you. They all do it.

Liberals want the government to tax breathing because there's CO2 when you exhale!!!!

Liberals want to institute communism, total wealth redistribution!

Liberals think government is the answer to everything!

It's ridiculous, but his audience believes it. They believe it because they hear it all the time... from Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/etc.
 
But a lot of progressive liberals do believe the government should regulate major aspects of society.

I agree that not all liberals think that way, but MANY do. You don't see conservatives who believe in big government, communism, wealth distribution, and the taxing of CO2. Who appeared at the liberal "One Nation" rally? It was the Communist and Socialist parties of Amercia. That, to me, is a red flag.
 
But a lot of progressive liberals do believe the government should regulate major aspects of society.

I agree that not all liberals think that way, but MANY do. You don't see conservatives who believe in big government, communism, wealth distribution, and the taxing of CO2. Who appeared at the liberal "One Nation" rally? It was the Communist and Socialist parties of Amercia. That, to me, is a red flag.

What does any of this have to do with the topic.

Glenn Beck lies, he distorts, he creates falsehoods, he exaggerates and does it knowingly so, he's a smart guy who's made a lot of money off others ignorance. Quite Genius actually.

But I love the fact when the charge is made that he lies it all comes down to...

"SOCIALISM RAR! RAR! RAR! LEFTISTS LIE AND HATE AMERICA..."

So... you can't prove he doesn't lie?
 
I can't prove if he has or hasn't lied because as I said I'm not experience in what he says. I'm sure he's not always right and I'm not foolish enough to think he's never lied or spun an issue. I don't know; as I told you I'm not experienced enough to debate the issues with solid facts.

Socialists do wish to change America to something it was not founded as. However, I don't think that statements should be the only response to questions of his integrity; so basically, I agree with you on that point.
 
I can't prove if he has or hasn't lied because as I said I'm not experience in what he says. I'm sure he's not always right and I'm not foolish enough to think he's never lied or spun an issue. I don't know; as I told you I'm not experienced enough to debate the issues with solid facts.

Socialists do wish to change America to something it was not founded as. However, I don't think that statements should be the only response to questions of his integrity; so basically, I agree with you on that point.

At least for this post.

You are a gentlemen and a Scholar sir.
 
Whenever Glenn Beck tells you what liberals think/believe, he's lying to you. They all do it.

Liberals want the government to tax breathing because there's CO2 when you exhale!!!!

Liberals want to institute communism, total wealth redistribution!

Liberals think government is the answer to everything!

It's ridiculous, but his audience believes it. They believe it because they hear it all the time... from Beck/Hannity/Limbaugh/etc.

Is he saying that about all liberals or is he just suggesting that some liberals think that?
 
What does any of this have to do with the topic.

Glenn Beck lies, he distorts, he creates falsehoods, he exaggerates and does it knowingly so, he's a smart guy who's made a lot of money off others ignorance. Quite Genius actually.

But I love the fact when the charge is made that he lies it all comes down to...

"SOCIALISM RAR! RAR! RAR! LEFTISTS LIE AND HATE AMERICA..."

So... you can't prove he doesn't lie?

Maybe that's the reason that he is sucessful at being a political pundant. Thats what they do - it's in the job description.
 
I really don't buy much of what Beck suggests. I do TIVO him, then I watch his show about 3 days a week and it only takes me 10 minutes per episode. I just scan through to find if he has anything new to say. He rarely does. But when he does, I do want to be informed about it. Sure, everyone has told a lie or two and everyone is occasionally mistaken. I am sure that he is no exception, but for anyone to claim that he "tells lies" is being very dishonest. I believe that the facts that he presents are very accurate and nothing of significance has ever been proved to be a lie, we have to each make up our mind about his conspirousy theories. As listeners we just have to do our best to filter out the bull****.

Overall, I feel that I am more informed due to the information and potential senerios that he has presented. Honestly, I'd never have come up with that stuff on my own. If his theories are correct it will be to our advantage that we are knowlegable enough not to let this stuff sneak up on us (any more than we already have). If he is wrong, then he is just wrong and no harm has been done.
 
Back
Top Bottom