- Joined
- May 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,716
- Reaction score
- 790
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yeah, I see that you've edited my words to change the context of my point.
My original point being that I saw nothing in the Beck edit, which changed the context of the BOY King's comments. Editing out his thoughts on Colonial Homies, doesn't change the relevance of his point regarding the US Constitution.
Thus your argument here; wherein you overtly distort my position, to diamterically alter my stated position; claiming that this is exactly what Beck did, is a argument which serves no purpose beyond DECEIT. Which is to say that your argument represents a FRAUD... Which some would argue constitutes a lie, with many believing such to represent a lie of the D A M N A B L E variety.
Editing out verbal stumbling, dissemblence... or other such irrelevancies is not deceptiv; unless and until the edit CHANGES THE CONTEXT OR CAUSES THE LISTENER TO BE MISGUIDED INTO BELIEVING THAT THE SPEAKER INTENDED TO CONVEY SOMETHING WHICH THE SPEAKER DID NOT INTEND, editing a speaker's comments is a perfectly valid technique... it simply saves room for more content within the scope of the project... Beck's edit did not change the point or the context of Hussein's statement. Period.
Now I've challenged those who claim that Beck's edit did so, to SPECIFICALLY QUOTE THE EDITED PORTIONS OF HOMIES COMMENTS AND SHOW WHERE THE EDIT CHANGED THE COMMENT OR HIS POINT. You chose instead to edit my comments, flipping the statement entirely and deceitfully imply that this is what Beck did. And you did so because you desperately want to maintain this fraud, and cannot do so using Barry's actual statement.
But I gotta say, as FAILS go... THIS was a BEAUTY!
"Boy king?" "Homie?" :roll:
Congratulations. You've just won the newbie-poster FAIL award. Your prize is a shiny new ignore. :2wave: