If he was Clintons lawyer you'd be singing his praises, how he took down the mafia, fought corruption, was brilliant on 911. But......he's the "evil orange man", so...…..
Okay, so Giuliani has incriminating or really embarrassing dirt on Trump. Is there any other way to read this?
Giuliani quips he has 'insurance' if Trump throws him 'under the bus' | TheHill
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani remarked Saturday that he has “insurance” if the president tries to turn on him while defending their relationship amid the ongoing House impeachment inquiry.
Giuliani in a wide-ranging interview on Fox News declined to say if he has spoken with Trump in recent days, saying, "You can assume that I talk to him early and often."
He then touted what he called a "very, very good relationship" with Trump before knocking unspecified comments about him in the press, calling them "totally insulting."
"I’ve seen things written like he’s going to throw me under the bus. When they say that, I say he isn’t, but I have insurance," Giuliani told Fox News's Ed Henry.
Now how could he have "insurance" if Trump hasn't done anything corrupt?
:thinking
Just because you can dispute his points doesn't mean he's lying. If you intend to do that in those types of situations, why even debate something in the first place? I mean, I'll go back and forth with anybody here, and if I can't dispute or disprove an issue or point, I'll say so, tip my hat and move on. Just saying "he's lying" is lazy and disingenuous.
Just because you can dispute his points doesn't mean he's lying. If you intend to do that in those types of situations, why even debate something in the first place? I mean, I'll go back and forth with anybody here, and if I can't dispute or disprove an issue or point, I'll say so, tip my hat and move on. Just saying "he's lying" is lazy and disingenuous.
Just because you can dispute his points doesn't mean he's lying. If you intend to do that in those types of situations, why even debate something in the first place? I mean, I'll go back and forth with anybody here, and if I can't dispute or disprove an issue or point, I'll say so, tip my hat and move on. Just saying "he's lying" is lazy and disingenuous.
er uh del, our conversation was not about the other lies or nonsense Ghouliani was spewing. It was about his "insurance" claim. The reason you cant follow a simple point is because you're in a cult. Please prove me wrong and discuss his "insurance" claim. thanks in advance.
er uh del, our conversation was not about the other lies or nonsense Ghouliani was spewing. It was about his "insurance" claim. The reason you cant follow a simple point is because you're in a cult. Please prove me wrong and discuss his "insurance" claim. thanks in advance.
You mean like the 'insurance policy' that Strzok talked about that didnt bother you one bit?
Okay, so Giuliani has incriminating or really embarrassing dirt on Trump. Is there any other way to read this?
What I'm saying is, if you can dispute Giuliani's claim do so. If you believe calling someone a liar proves they're wrong, doesn't make it so. YOU claimed his clarification of his "insurance" quip was a lie. So, the burden of proof is on you. My position on it is, it's a non-issue. Does he have something on Trump? Maybe , so what? And parroting the latest democrat/MSM "it's a cult" talking point , makes you look silly. As I said, I'll debate with you, but let's leave the petty insults on the playground. Cult indeed :roll:
Your constant demonizing of an American citizens right to his own beliefs and opinions show just how far you have gone from American values.
Just because you can dispute his points doesn't mean he's lying. If you intend to do that in those types of situations, why even debate something in the first place? I mean, I'll go back and forth with anybody here, and if I can't dispute or disprove an issue or point, I'll say so, tip my hat and move on. Just saying "he's lying" is lazy and disingenuous.
Sorry del, you're not following my clear point. I don't care what rudy said for 15 minutes. We were discussing his "insurance" comment. You flailed with a silly "it was a small part of his conversation" and "not the main topic". Nobody on the planet uses your silly "math" of "incriminating statement divided by total words said". You even reiterated you failed logic by posting "nuh uh, cherry picking". Now you are trying to deflect (and desperately I might add) with me having to prove his other comments were lying garbage. Forget for a second that everything he says is lying garbage, we were discussing his "insurance" claim. to any normal person, his statement is simply an admission of guilt. I don't need "insurance" from a con man who has repeatedly turned on his henchmen. for some reason rudy thinks he does.
Now if you reply, try not to deflect again.
No.Okay, so Giuliani has incriminating or really embarrassing dirt on Trump. Is there any other way to read this?
No.
Which won't stop the Trumpologists from trying, mind you.... But this is clearly a threat to Trump.
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
Yes ... try this one:
@RudyGiuliani
Follow Follow @RudyGiuliani
More
TRUTH ALERT:
The statement I’ve made several times of having an insurance policy, if thrown under bus, is sarcastic & relates to the files in my safe about the Biden Family’s 4 decade monetizing of his office.
If I disappear, it will appear immediately along with my RICO chart.
1:29 PM - 23 Nov 2019
I doubt that Giuliani will be thrown under the bus. He was the one running around behind the scenes at Trump's behest to get Ukraine to agree to open a politically motivated investigation against Biden. He knows where all the body's are, and Trump knows it. So he will be protected to the end.
Another day at the gossip fountain.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?