• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Get this Liberal Democrat off the Viagra

Jack Dawson

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
MEMPHIS, Tenn. - State Sen. John Ford testified in a juvenile court hearing that he keeps two homes, living with two different women whose children he fathered.



Ford's testimony was part of his defense in a child support case. The Memphis Democrat heads a Senate committee that guides the state's child welfare policies, and for the past year he's tried to make use of a law he authored that keeps court-ordered support lower when a father is financially responsible for other children.


In a Juvenile Court hearing last year that is set for a follow-up hearing on Tuesday, Ford said he lives some days with ex-wife Tamara Mitchell-Ford and the three children they had together. On others, he stays with his longtime girlfriend, Connie Mathews, and their two children.


Ford and Mitchell-Ford went through a bitter divorce in 2002 that led to Mitchell-Ford's jailing after she plowed her car through Mathews' Collierville home.


Ford said he pays nearly all bills for both families. They stay in houses he owns and where he also lives, though neither home is in his South Memphis Senate district.


"You have two homes?" Referee Felicia Hogan asks during the tape recorded hearing from November. "Well, that's unusual."


"Not necessarily," Ford shot back. "I know people who got five."


Hogan responded: "For child support purposes that's unusual, let me put it that way then."


Ford is battling a suit by a third woman, Dana Smith, who is trying to increase his court-ordered support of a 10-year-old girl he fathered. Smith, a former employee under Ford when he was General Sessions Clerk, won a 1996 sexual harassment verdict against him.


Ford contends that any increase for Smith should be tempered by his financial obligations to his other five minor children. None of those children is subject to child support orders.


In the hearing, Ford argued all five children live in his household — a household that encompasses two homes — and because of that he is exempt from rules requiring strict proof of his financial support of them.


Hogan rejected Ford's request, saying he must produce evidence of bills paid if he wants credit to lessen any modification of Smith's child support.


Mitchell-Ford told The Commercial Appeal newspaper last week said she can verify at least some of Ford's contentions. She said she is six months pregnant, and the father, she said, is John Ford, now 62.


"John is over here every single day, if not staying here," she said.

:eek:
 
J

Jufarius87

well with all that his constuents would be pretty stupid to reelect him
 

heyjoeo

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
380
Reaction score
1
The Republicans have the same scandels. It's called being a POLITICAL. Don't try to label one guy's actions to the entire party, because thats what you are trying to do.
 

Jack Dawson

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
My my you are testy. Lose an election recently? Lose seats in the House and the Senate AND the Presidency.?

Gosh you are angry. :eek:

If you couldn't tell by the headline it was a joke, you are in pretty sad 'extremist' shape. You have about as much of a sense of humor as Pat Buchanan on the other end of the spectrum.

Geeeeeesh, lighten up, you'll live longer.
 

heyjoeo

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
380
Reaction score
1
Yes blame my anger on an election.

I'm more angry because people like you waste topics on a political forum and don't even provide valid opinions and facts.
 
Top Bottom