I think you're underestimating the degree to which those overlap with Obamacare. A number of Enzi's steps are in Obamacare (in fact, the language from his tort reform section was copied verbatim into Obamacare), the Patients Choice Act was built around state-based exchanges as was Obamacare, etc.
Plenty of those ideas appear in some variation in the law, which is part of the reason the GOP has had such difficulty coalescing around a real alternative since it passed.
Honestly, nothing will matter until we get some transparency into health costs.
When an operation can cost $500 in one place and $50,000 in another, we have a severe information problem.
We gotta fix that before anything else.
The same is true of housing costs, how would you "fix" that?
Honestly, nothing will matter until we get some transparency into health costs.
When an operation can cost $500 in one place and $50,000 in another, we have a severe information problem.
We gotta fix that before anything else.
Supply and demand simply does not work in healtcare.
That is why there is no real proposal from the Republicans.
What makes you say that? Thailand is benefiting from medical tourism. Seems supply and demand works there.
I'd argue that there is no real proposal from the GOP because they have no ideas for healthcare. Obama stole most of them.
There was nothing wrong with health care in America. We have the best equipped hospitals, skilled doctors and nurses and we compare well with the rest of the world technologically.
There are problems within the insurance industry however many of those problems have been created by government. Managed care was a governmental creation that created problems with patient care many disliked. Congress took too much control using it's authority to regulate interstate commerce that stifled competition within the insurance industry.
Frankly, there are things that government can do to improve insurance. We would be better off as a nation if we went back to the days before Obamacare and took steps which protected patients, increased competition between insurance companies and lowered costs. All Obamacare really does is lock in extra profits for drug companies and force people to buy a product they don't want and I don't care what John Roberts thinks.
No, it is the greed. Period.
I disagree. We have the best equipment because our health care system is for profit. That profit gets reinvested in technology and improvement in patient care. I had a friend living in Belgium and was treated for cancer in one of their hospitals. During a heat wave that killed people in Paris, I visited her. She had extra insurance so she was in a private room. She had just gotten out of surgery and was recovering in her room. Her hospital couldn't afford central air conditioning so the window was open, it was probably about 95 degrees in her room and her bed was soaked from her sweat.
I don't even want to hear about greed. Profit is a good thing.
Anecdotal. Our system is badly flawed, you (the colletive right) dont understand that simply because of all the things you dont want to hear.
Which has been attempted more than a dozen times. Obamacare is here to stay, whether we like it or not. I am being pragmatic in my argument here. I am not crazy about Obamacare either, but am looking for something that it could be replaced with. I have seen some decent ideas from both Conservatives and Liberals in this thread, which means that some kind of common ground exists, which could be used to hammer out a better solution than what we have now.
So what kind of solution exists, within the framework of Obamacare, that both Liberals and Conservatives could spin as a victory, and save face? I believe that this is the only paradigm that would work at this time, in light of the present political situation.
I pointed out that profit is not greed and that profit has allowed us to build the most advanced health care system in the world.
Profit CAN be greed though. If during a hurricane I jack up my water price to $100 per gallon, you're actually telling me that isn't greed?
Which is exaclty what happens with healthcare, all the time, not just when there is a hurricaine.
Profit CAN be greed though. If during a hurricane I jack up my water price to $100 per gallon, you're actually telling me that isn't greed?
Because I cannot refuse medical care due to expense if I would die.
But that doesn't mean the whole supply demand can't work in non-vital aspects of healthcare.
The federal government doesn't have the power to regulate healthcare? Have you ever heard of Medicare and Medicaid?Replace it with nothing. The federal govt does not have the power to regulate healtcare. In fact, start repealing the rest of the federal health laws, including medicare.
The federal government doesn't have the power to regulate healthcare? Have you ever heard of Medicare and Medicaid?
Of course. You wont find them anywhere in the constitution.
The Supreme Court disagrees. I would love to be rid of S.S., Medicare, and Obamacare too but that isn't going to happen.