• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Get out of the way right wing economic growth killers

R

Razoo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
24,476
Reaction score
7,808
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Get out of the way anti American conservatives you had Reagan/Bush, Bush/Quale, Bush/Cheney and Trump/Pence. What is well documented is the economic crash with each of those administrations:

Conservative RINO’s CRASHING THE ECONOMY

== http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/09/did-republicans-deliberately-crash-us-economy

The RINO Conservatives Reagan/Bush Savings and Loan Heist

== http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/18/1352819/--The-Bush-Brothers-are-Bank-Robbers#

The RINO Conservatives Bush/Cheney Wall Street Home Loan Heist

== http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2009/0709macewan.html

== http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/...-Meme-and-Ignore-the-Money-Launderers-UPDATED

What Did RINO Conservatives Do With $700 billion of bank bail out money?

== http://www.democracynow.org/2009/9/10/good_billions_after_bad_one_year

Why did RINO Conservative GW Bush Lie About Social Security?( This WILL cost taxpayers $4 trillion,place taxpayers insurance money at risk and wreck the economy)

== http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2010/0111orr.html

Still A Bad Idea –The RINO Conservative ENTITLEMENT Package for the wealtiest 1% = STILL INCREASES TAX AND DEBT

== http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2001/0301miller.html

AGAIN RINO Conservatives WAGE WAR AGAINST USA ECONOMY.

== http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/09/did-republicans-deliberately-crash-us-economy

More Proof Conservative Supply-Side Economic Policies Do Not ...




 
lol
 
This is incredibly stupid---establishment DC politicians on both sides were all over every issue you raised. Its like your analysis is blind in one eye.

BTW, those sources? BWAHAHHAHAHA Daily KOS?
 
JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, what about that big meeting that you talk about — I think it was October 12th — the nine big banks? Eight of those banks, as you reported, ended up getting two-thirds of all of the money, 67 percent. How did that meeting come about, and who was there?


JAMES STEELE: Paulson actually called that meeting. He called the heads of those banks the night before and said, “I want you here tomorrow in Washington.” He was very vague as to what the purpose of the meeting was. But once they got there, he told them, “You are taking money. We are going to buy stock in your banks. And we need to get this economy going again.”

Some bankers objected, saying by accepting this money it would look like they were weak. Others simply said they didn’t need it.


The fact of the matter is, one of the things we concluded very early on in this whole process is that while Treasury was trying to create the image that there was widespread weakness in these banks — and then there was a credit freeze, there’s no doubt about that — the way they went about this, just throwing the money out there in hopes that that would get the economy going, is not really what this was all about.

There were just a handful of institutions that were terribly weakened. AIG the insurer, Bank of America, Citigroup, those three were clearly in very weakened form. So, many of the other big banks were not. And the best example that they didn’t need this money in the beginning was that many of them, within just a very few months, paid everything back.


AMY GOODMAN: Don Barlett, this meeting of the big nine, with Vikram Pandit of Citigroup, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, Kenneth Lewis of Bank of America, Richard Kovacevich of Wells Fargo, John Thain of Merrill Lynch, John Mack of Morgan Stanley, Lloyd Blankfein, who succeeded Paulson as head of Goldman Sachs, Robert Kelly of the Bank of New York Mellon and Ronald Logue of State Street Bank, went to the secretary’s conference room. It was even difficult to find this information out. But what did he lay out for them there? And how does Paulson, who was former head of one of these banks, fit into it, as well?


DONALD BARLETT: Well, reduced to its simplest terms, he laid in front of them, each of them, a sheet of paper and saying, “Write on this the amount of money you’re going to take, and you are going to take it. Otherwise,” the implication was, “regulators will be looking at you and finding something wrong there. This is one of those areas in which you have no choice. By the end of the day, you will sign that you’re taking this amount of money. You know, call your boards, do whatever you need to do, but you will take the money.”

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/9/10/good_billions_after_bad_one_year
 
my sources represent some of the best investigative journalism on planet earth.......it's a learning experience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…