- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
If Democrats and Republicans on the National level continue to greet lawbreakers with open arms, there is always the states. Georgia has passed a law cracking down on illegal immigration. The way I see it, if the Federal government wants to shirk responsibility, the states have every right under the Tenth Amendment to do the job. If the Feds dont like it, they can stick it.
I am one of the biggest Bush bashers on this board. His Iraq war sucks, his spending sucks, and most of his policies suck, but where I do give him a lot of credit were his picks for the US Supreme Court (Harriet Miers excepted, but she was pulled). These picks will ensure that the Feds dont attempt to interfere with the Constitutional rights that the states are entitled to. On his court picks I give Bush an A+. In spite of Bush's many other failures, history over time might just judge his presidency as a successful one because he has shaped the Supreme Court for the next generation, ensuring the court will do its job interpreting the Constution, and not trying to rewrite it.
The Bush presidency may look like a complete disaster in the short term, but over the long haul, Bush will be remembered somewhat favorably due to his stance on judicial nominations. I believe that, many years from now, his presidency will have been defined by that stance.
Oh yes, one more thing.
Go Georgia!!!!
Show the rest of us how its done.
Article is here.
I am one of the biggest Bush bashers on this board. His Iraq war sucks, his spending sucks, and most of his policies suck, but where I do give him a lot of credit were his picks for the US Supreme Court (Harriet Miers excepted, but she was pulled). These picks will ensure that the Feds dont attempt to interfere with the Constitutional rights that the states are entitled to. On his court picks I give Bush an A+. In spite of Bush's many other failures, history over time might just judge his presidency as a successful one because he has shaped the Supreme Court for the next generation, ensuring the court will do its job interpreting the Constution, and not trying to rewrite it.
The Bush presidency may look like a complete disaster in the short term, but over the long haul, Bush will be remembered somewhat favorably due to his stance on judicial nominations. I believe that, many years from now, his presidency will have been defined by that stance.
Oh yes, one more thing.
Go Georgia!!!!
Show the rest of us how its done.
Article is here.