• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

George Ryan found guilty (1 Viewer)

scottyz

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
CHICAGO - Former Gov. George Ryan, who drew international praise when he commuted the sentences of everyone on Illinois' death row, was convicted of racketeering and fraud Monday in a corruption scandal that ended his political career in 2003.


Ryan faces up to 20 years in prison for racketeering conspiracy charge alone, the most serious against him in the 22-count indictment. The jury found him guilty of all counts, including fraud, obstructing the
Internal Revenue Service and lying to the FBI. Sentencing was set for Aug. 4.

Co-defendant Larry Warner, a Chicago businessman and Ryan friend, was found guilty of racketeering conspiracy, mail fraud, attempted extortion, illegally structuring bank withdrawals and money laundering.


Prosecutors accused Ryan of steering big-money state contracts and leases, including a $25 million IBM computer deal, to his friends and political insiders while he was secretary of state in the 1990s and then as governor starting in 1999.

In return for that help, Ryan was rewarded with annual winter vacations in Jamaica, stays in Cancun and Palm Springs and gifts ranging from a golf bag to $145,000 in loans to his brother's business, prosecutors said.

Warner, 67, raked in $3 million from Ryan-era deals, according to the office of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald — who during the trial was also leading the federal investigation into the leak of
CIA officer
Valerie Plame's identity.

It was the state's biggest political corruption trial in decades, and had its share of troubles.

In late March, months of testimony nearly went down the drain when the judge discovered two jurors had failed to mention arrests on their court questionnaires. Rather than declare a mistrial, U.S. District Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer decided to replace the two jurors with alternates and, over the objection of Ryan's attorneys, ordered the jury to start deliberations over.

The new jury had deliberated for 10 days when it announced its verdict Monday.

Afterward, Ryan attorney Dan K. Webb, a former federal prosecutor, zeroed in on the judge's decision to replace the jurors.

"We're going to begin working immediately on post-trial motions to try to get this verdict overturned," Webb said.

During the trial, Webb had pounded on a theme that no one ever testified to seeing Ryan take a payoff. His powerful law firm, Winston & Strawn, represented Ryan for free — at an estimated cost of $10 million.

The corruption scandal that led to Ryan's downfall began over a decade ago with a much smaller focus: a federal investigation into a fiery van crash in Wisconsin that killed six children.

The deadly 1994 crash exposed a scheme inside the Illinois secretary of state's office in which unqualified truck drivers obtained licenses for bribes. Ryan was secretary of state at the time, and prosecutors would later argue that thousands of dollars in payoff money from the licenses went into a Ryan campaign fund.

The probe expanded over the next eight years into a wide-ranging corruption investigation that eventually reached Ryan in the governor's office.

Seventy-nine former state officials, lobbyists, truck drivers and others have been since charged. Before Ryan's trial, 74 had been convicted, including Ryan's longtime top aide, Scott Fawell.

Fawell was a star witness against Ryan and the author of a 1994 memo that prosecutor Patrick Collins called "the Magna Carta" of the racketeering scheme.

The memo urged Ryan, then-secretary of state, to replace inspector general Dean Bauer with someone who "won't ask about FR tickets" — political fundraising tickets. Bauer himself pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and acknowledged the government could prove he had spent seven years covering up scandals to spare Ryan personal and political embarrassment.

Even as he faced federal charges back home, Ryan accepted speaking invitations across the country and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his criticism of the death penalty.

The auto accident that set the case in motion killed six children of the Rev. Scott and Janet Willis. A trucking company official later said he believed the truck driver's license was one of several bought from a state official.

The Willises, who received a $100 million settlement, attended parts of Ryan's trial.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060417/ap_on_re_us/governor_s_trial

Yet another IL governor behind bars. I assume Ryan is the reason we have so many out of control truck drivers.
 
Excellent article for this reason....

I read the whole thing, and then skimmed over it again, and unless I missed it, not ONCE did it say what party he was...

As of this moment, I still don't know what he was, and that's good...

"A-hole" is the only thing I can think of, regardless of political affiliation...
 
Chicago
Big union town
Corruption



.....I'm guessing democrat.
 
Doh!! :shock:

Imagine that! Can't imagine that darned liberal biased media not mentioning that. :mrgreen:
 
Captain America said:
Chicago
Big union town
Corruption



.....I'm guessing democrat.
Actually he was a Republican. It's disappointing because other than this I thought he did a pretty good job as Governor.
 
scottyz said:
I assume Ryan is the reason we have so many out of control truck drivers.

Probably not, but his greedy desire to become Governor with a couple of hundred thousand extra dollars from selling Commercial Drivers Licenses, allowed at least one unskilled, non english speaking driver to kill 6 children. For those 6 childrens lives, he and his gang received approximately $1400.00, for the license of the driver who killed them.

He is one of those great politicians who believe that because they have good political intentions, they can get in the position to fulfill them in any manner they choose.

Regards,

"C.J."
 
Captain America said:
Chicago
Big union town
Corruption



.....I'm guessing democrat.
See?...

That's the kind of response I was pointing out that DOESN'T belong...

That fact that the article said "Someone f'ed up" without giving party connections is EXACTLY the way you do it...

To say "Let me make assumptions or see what party he is first before I make a conclusion" is crap...

I should write a made-up story about a Democrat...watch all of the Democrats come running to defend him and all of the Republicans come running to attack...

Then two days later write an update saying I made a mistake and he was really a Republican...

Then wish I had a camera hook-up to all those who answered and see the egg on their face becasue they answered after reading their own party manual instead of using their head for once...
 
cnredd said:
See?...

That's the kind of response I was pointing out that DOESN'T belong...

That fact that the article said "Someone f'ed up" without giving party connections is EXACTLY the way you do it...

To say "Let me make assumptions or see what party he is first before I make a conclusion" is crap...

I should write a made-up story about a Democrat...watch all of the Democrats come running to defend him and all of the Republicans come running to attack...

Then two days later write an update saying I made a mistake and he was really a Republican...

Then wish I had a camera hook-up to all those who answered and see the egg on their face becasue they answered after reading their own party manual instead of using their head for once...

I agree.
Pure laziness
 
akyron said:
I agree.
Pure laziness
Unfortunately, I'll have to disagree with your conclusion...

It's quite the opposite of lazy...

When certain individuals...even right here on this forum...see a story that makes the other side look bad, they get a boost of adrenaline and yell and scream like total spazzes claiming some sort of personal victory...

Not because their "team" done good...But beause the other "team" done bad...

I can just imagine a player from a team that won a game 1-0 say they proved they're better because the other team hit a batter, overthrew second base on a steal, then threw a wild pitch...

Yeah...MUCH better...:roll:
 
cnredd said:
Unfortunately, I'll have to disagree with your conclusion...

It's quite the opposite of lazy...

When certain individuals...even right here on this forum...see a story that makes the other side look bad, they get a boost of adrenaline and yell and scream like total spazzes claiming some sort of personal victory...

Not because their "team" done good...But beause the other "team" done bad...

I can just imagine a player from a team that won a game 1-0 say they proved they're better because the other team hit a batter, overthrew second base on a steal, then threw a wild pitch...

Yeah...MUCH better...:roll:

I just think its lazy to jump on the bandwagon and not take the time to look up your own history/facts/story/etc. Sure its a pain but at least you should be somewhat correct. Being right never protects you but it feels better than being wrong and having to eat crow.

I do see your point.
 
Honestly, I had no clue about this guys political affailiation when cnnredd brought political affailiation (or the lack thereof) into the discussion.

Research indicates I made a "guess." Anyone interested can confirm that by paging back. I even stated it was a guess. A guess is not presented as fact in my neck of the woods.

My guess was based on the fact that I know Chicago to be a strong union town, especially during that timeframe. Unions typically support the Democrat Party. However, to my surprise, he was not a democrat. 2+2=5 in this case. It was not my intention to slam democrats or simply slander the party by relating it to a criminal. I was just going off of logical deduction, (which is not always correct.) I humbly apologize to any democrat I may have offended but I give you my word that was not my intention.

Just as many posters here, too often, guess that I'm a fundie because of my pro-life stance, I guessed that a Chicago Mayor was a democrat. Just playin' the odds. :mrgreen:

So there. My guess, albeit a somewhat educated guess based on odds, was wrong. But it was, after all, only a guess. We ARE still allowed to guess once in a while aren't we? I surely don't want to break any forum rules.:3oops:
 
Last edited:
Captain America said:
Honestly, I had no clue about this guys political affailiation when cnnredd brought political affailiation (or the lack thereof) into the discussion.

Research indicates I made a "guess." Anyone interested can confirm that by paging back. I even stated it was a guess. A guess is not presented as fact in my neck of the woods.

My guess was based on the fact that I know Chicago to be a strong union town, especially during that timeframe. Unions typically support the Democrat Party. However, to my surprise, he was not a democrat. 2+2=5 in this case. It was not my intention to slam democrats or simply slander the party by relating it to a criminal. I was just going off of logical deduction, (which is not always correct.) I humbly apologize to any democrat I may have offended but I give you my word that was not my intention.

Just as many posters here, too often, guess that I'm a fundie because of my pro-life stance, I guessed that a Chicago Mayor was a democrat. Just playin' the odds. :mrgreen:

So there. My guess, albeit a somewhat educated guess based on odds, was wrong. But it was, after all, only a guess. We ARE still allowed to guess once in a while aren't we? I surely don't want to break any forum rules.:3oops:

Can you guess what the capital of Illinois is?
 
My_name_is_not_Larry said:
Springfield!

I was asking captain, but thanks. Can you tell me where the capitals were before Springfield?
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
I was asking captain, but thanks. Can you tell me where the capitals were before Springfield?

Illinois {il-uh-noy'}


"The first capital was Kaskaskia, followed by Vandalia, along the Kaskaskia River, which held the position for 20 years. After strong pressure from Abraham Lincoln, the capital was moved to Springfield by an 1837 legislative vote."

Chicago is number 5 for the fattest people in the USA.
Detroit being #1 and Honolulu being the "fittest".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom