George Bush Interview- Hannity

Jetboogieman said:

Dishonest as ever Grant.

You wanna dish it out, you better be ready to take it.

Click to expand...

Aw, c'mon. You think I can't 'take it' from pipsqueaks like you?

I stick around as long as you amuse me but, honestly, I find you and most leftists to be rather dull and unimaginative. It's all so very old.

Fenton said:

Bush 43 was and is a humble and honest man. I've always had allot of respect for him.

He was defined as a President and a Man by the left, by a party that opposed him on principle.

The same party that used the " stupidity " of the Americans voter to justify their lies called Bush a liar throughout his Presidency.

And then they elected a ACTUAL Liar to be the President

The left called him incompetent and stupid, and then elected a incompetent President

Click to expand...

Gruber was right. There is little to add to that.

Grant said:

Gruber was right. There is little to add to that.

Click to expand...

Hell yes he was.

I suppose the Democrats just assumed that their BS wouldn't be exposed anytime soon.

But thats not how lies work. I told my children years ago that lies lead to more lies and then to more lies but the Democrats apparently believed this wouldn't apply to them and their policies.

For the last 6 years when the obvious and highly destructive effects of ObamaCare were brought up by people like you and I we were told that WE were the liars.

That increases and mandates on the Health Insurance industry WOULDN'T be passed on to the consumer.

That it would be " affordable " and that of-course " keeping your Doctor and Insurance " meant paying more.

Thanks Gruber. You just proved millions of Conservatives right.

Fiddytree said:

This isn't often from the viewpoint of conservative historians, but liberal ones. They may still greatly prefer FDR, but they aren't nearly as dismissive of Hoover as was once expected in the midst of FDR dynasty holders like Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

I know this is a hard thing to understand for political hacks, but trust me, historians tend to revisit previous assumptions.

Let's be honest disney. How often do you actually sit down and read histories or historical journals? How many books a month, bud?

Click to expand...

I read enough to recognize that there are a few historians who, over the years, have attempted to rehabilitate Hoover's legacy. But they are few and far between. I fully expect that there will be a handful that try to do the same with GWB. They will fail as well. It isn't about political hackery...its about looking at the facts and not some historical spin that someone attempts to put on it. Don't believe everything you read.

Grant said:

I said it was NOT stalking!

Click to expand...

It is extremely hard to portray sarcasm on the internet. In fact almost every corporation forbids it because it can be sooo easily misread.