nice ass grab at the end
All of this is absolutely false.George Takei is funny ****, although I didn't like him on Star Trek. Seriously, it just wasn't his best work. That aside, this video pretty much sums it all up with the closing argument; those who oppose marriage equality just don't know that they're being a**holes. They can roll around the world, spouting out Naturalist Fallacies and trying to appeal to tradition or religion, but it all comes down to your personal dislike for them. You're not sticking up for your religious tenants, or the good of society, or the way it's supposed to be,.. your just an a**hole, whether you can accept it or not. If someone tried to regulate your marriages, you'd call them a**holes, too. Stupid people.
George Takei is funny ****, although I didn't like him on Star Trek. Seriously, it just wasn't his best work. That aside, this video pretty much sums it all up with the closing argument; those who oppose marriage equality just don't know that they're being a**holes. They can roll around the world, spouting out Naturalist Fallacies and trying to appeal to tradition or religion, but it all comes down to your personal dislike for them. You're not sticking up for your religious tenants, or the good of society, or the way it's supposed to be,.. your just an a**hole, whether you can accept it or not. If someone tried to regulate your marriages, you'd call them a**holes, too. Stupid people.
All of this is absolutely false.
Please refer to this post for a more accurate presentation of why mentally and emotionally intelligent and unbiased people oppose the oxymoronic "gay marriage", oppose the use of the word "marriage" applied to SS couples: http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news-mainstream-media/172031-gay-marriage-americas-house-may-not-stay-divided-long-w-29-210-a-53.html#post1062299028.
Absolutely false.there is same sex marriage, it's the same as any other marriage, sorry.
Absolutely false.
Mistakes of application are simply that: mistakes.
No amount of mistakes has the power to rightly and accurately redefine, in this case, the word "marriage", which means and has always meant "between a man and a woman as husband and wife".
SS-couples' committed romantic domestic partnership civil unions are rightly called "homosexual marriage" or "homarriage" or the like ..
.. But not "marriage".
It really is that simple.
Absolutely false.
Mistakes of application are simply that: mistakes.
No amount of mistakes has the power to rightly and accurately redefine, in this case, the word "marriage", which means and has always meant "between a man and a woman as husband and wife".
SS-couples' committed romantic domestic partnership civil unions are rightly called "homosexual marriage" or "homarriage" or the like ..
.. But not "marriage".
It really is that simple.
It is up to the couple not you.
I call my romantic relationship marriage. seems like i get away with it.
False .. absolutely false.It is up to the couple not you.
False .. absolutely false.
It is up to society respecting definitive propriety.
False .. absolutely false.
It is up to society respecting definitive propriety.
Incomprehensible, and thus meaningless.Yeah, they do, you wetting by your own definition.
It is the respect for words and their true meaning as a foundational tool of accurate communication.WTF is definitive propriety:roll:
It is the respect for words and their true meaning as a foundational tool of accurate communication.
I explained that in previous posts.
Go back and read them.
Incomprehensible, and thus meaningless.
It is the respect for words and their true meaning as a foundational tool of accurate communication.
I explained that in previous posts.
Go back and read them.
Right back at you.simply because you believe something is true, don't necessarily make it so.
False, obviously.The basic premise that marriage has always been ONLY between one man and one woman is not a true statement
Some of which were not rightly called "marriage".There have been many variations of ceremonially-blessed joinings of lovers.
A good reminder for you.A lack of historic knowledge does appear to be the source of many false beliefs.