NoLeftNoRight
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2015
- Messages
- 1,578
- Reaction score
- 418
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Since the Left seems immovable in their quest to continue encouraging the carnage, is civil war the only answer?
Will Americans eventually be forced to take back the nation by any means necessary? Or will we simply continue the slide into 3rd world status?
I'm no fan of vigilantism, but repect those that take care of their neighborhoods. We had informal networks in my old neighborhood in the city, where we tried our best to keep the punks from outside in line when they were on our turf.We have Asian citizens in South Sacramento forming armed citizen patrols due to gang robberies. Typically, it's very quiet, and there are rumors of a certain gang leader going missing.
I'm no fan of vigilantism, but repect those that take care of their neighborhoods. We had informal networks in my old neighborhood in the city, where we tried our best to keep the punks from outside in line when they were on our turf.
But it can be dangerous in terms of over-reaction and bringing unsuitable individuals into the fray. We see this nationally, with the Trump campaign.
So now that I'm out of the city and in a nice 'burb, I'm of two minds on this. But I suspect if I was back in the city, I'd be doing what it is I had to do.
The death toll from gang violence continues to climb across the nation.
Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub - Washington Times
I do not care whether left rules the nation or the right rules the nations AS LONG AS we have lawful order and peace and equal justice for all.
And I do not think ALL on the Left are culpable and negligent as others. But in general they support it and a Presidential candidate who promises much more of it.
However, truth is that currently, those on the LEFT seem to be the ones contributing to the immigration problem and the gang violence problem.
Noone that I have read about on the right advocates for Sanctuary cities where violent criminals are known to find safe refuge.
Noone on the right that I know of advocates for open borders allowing thousands of illegal immigrants to cross the border and often join MS13 and other violent gangs.
The Left's Presidential candidate brags that she will bring in millions more illegal "refugees" even though solutions exist for helping them in their own countries.
People are dying and it's getting worse. The Left generally sees no problem with it even though communities that are liberal usually are targeted first and hardest.
MS13 and other gangs are setting up mass illegal weapons black markets where SERIOUS weapons like hand grenades (see links) and fully automatic weapons are being smuggled in
in record numbers, yet the left stays firm on it's cult, and insane demands to disarm Americans.
https://pibillwarner.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/update-ms-13-andor-sur-13-gang-members-involved-in-exporting-stolen-u-s-cars-to-south-america-from-florida-vin-cloning/
Since the Left seems immovable in their quest to continue encouraging the carnage, is civil war the only answer?
Will Americans eventually be forced to take back the nation by any means necessary? Or will we simply continue the slide into 3rd world status?
What a foolish, ignorant,mean spirited (but totally expected Progressive) response. Apparently you are in a safety cocoon, totally oblivious to that's happening in Germany and any place where immigration is rampant.*yawn*
So are American citizens supposed to just sit back and watch our families and friends get murdered, raped and robbed because the left wants votes?
Is that the best Americans can do?
*yawn*
Violence of all types has been decreasing almost every year for the past two decades. Did you think it would simply continue to decrease? Just as in the stock market and in climate records and almost every other macro-scale metric, there WILL be ups and downs, and it's a great mistake to look at what's happening in one or two years and assume that such is a sign that the world's going to hell in a handbasket. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't be concerned, or that adjustments shouldn't be made, but it does mean that the proper perspective is the long-term prospective, as in "one or two years of increase do not by any means invalidate the nearly unprecedented two decades of decrease".
Just another reason to seriously curtail gun ownership.
It is proven that gun ownership is not the problem.
Try to remember that guns don't kill people...PEOPLE kill people. Be it with knives, bats, vehicles, bombs or whatever.
Until we find a way to stop the breeding of individuals who kill without remorse, for petty reasons and for criminal reasons, the problem will persist with or without guns.
Frankly, today I feel more inclined to carry a gun than at any time past.
Guns are flowing across the borders en masse. There is a huge black market for weapons coming from south of the border.
If we disarm Americans now, ONLY INNOCENT AMERICANS will be disarmed.
*yawn*
Violence of all types has been decreasing almost every year for the past two decades. Did you think it would simply continue to decrease? Just as in the stock market and in climate records and almost every other macro-scale metric, there WILL be ups and downs, and it's a great mistake to look at what's happening in one or two years and assume that such is a sign that the world's going to hell in a handbasket. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't be concerned, or that adjustments shouldn't be made, but it does mean that the proper perspective is the long-term prospective, as in "one or two years of increase do not by any means invalidate the nearly unprecedented two decades of decrease".
Crime is increasing, not decreasing, and the statistics are skewed to begin with.
Hilary and her policies encourage gang violence...
Are you claiming that the violent crime rates are as bad now as they were 20 years ago, or even close to as bad? Are you claiming that the violent crime rates have NOT been decreasing for most of 20 years? And on what do you base your claim that the statistics are skewed? What's your proof, other than what you personally want to believe?
What a foolish, ignorant,mean spirited (but totally expected Progressive) response. Apparently you are in a safety cocoon, totally oblivious to that's happening in Germany and any place where immigration is rampant.
Gangs have long been a terrible problem south of the border. Your people's Progressive agenda is accelerating the problem and putting American lives at risk....and all you can do is "Yawn" ?
It is insulting to anyone who has lost a loved one due to gang related or immigrant/refugee related violence to have anyone callously "Yawn" at their losses.
You probably live in a violence prone "liberal safety zone".
Remember that someone will yawn when it's your turn.
Violent crime is on the rise.
Ah. So...how, exactly, is it that crime continued to decrease in New York City, if it's her policies that encouraged gang violence? She wasn't a senator in Illinois - she was a senator in NY.
Because of stop and frisk... which she opposes.
Wrong. The crime rate was decreasing both before and after stop-and-frisk was implemented, and simply continued to decrease while stop-and-frisk was being used. What's more, the crime rate similarly decreased all across the nation with no respect to whether or not stop-and-frisk was implemented.
In other words, trying to credit stop-and-frisk for the decreasing crime rate is a classic case of the correlation-causation logical fallacy.
However, truth is that currently, those on the LEFT seem to be the ones contributing to the immigration problem and the gang violence problem.
Since the Left seems immovable in their quest to continue encouraging the carnage, is civil war the only answer?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?