- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 13,156
- Reaction score
- 1,038
- Location
- melbourne florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
No, are you unable to read? I even provided the link for further info.
It is a general proposal with no specifics as where the cuts will be and how much. Means nothing without specifics
It is a general proposal with no specifics as where the cuts will be and how much. Means nothing without specifics
There are more specifics at the site I referenced. It is actually very detailed for a framework, if you take the time to read it.
I did the link. It does not list specific numbers for specific programs. It is more general terms so Obama has no responsibility to be held to specifics.
When it comes from Obama? Yeah... it means platitudes. You know what "Money talks bull**** walks" means?It is not a budget proposal. Do you know what framework means?
Platitudes... meaningless platitudes.Obama provided a very detailed framework (in writing), based on the Simpson-Bowles report, for Congress to flesh out the exact amounts, for specific programs.
It is not a budget proposal. Do you know what framework means?
Obama provided a very detailed framework (in writing), based on the Simpson-Bowles report, for Congress to flesh out the exact amounts, for specific programs.
The gang of 6 has a real proposal.
Yep, based on Obama's framework that he provided. I am glad you approve! :sun
No based on the Bowles-Simpson Commission's recommendations
Largely yes, Obama based his framework on much of the Bowles-Simpson recommendations. It would seem you read the source I provided. I am impressed you did that ptif.
No the gang of 6 did that. Obama gave general things the gang of 6 is specific
That is what I said yes. Obama provide the framwork for the committee and they fleshed out the specifics. Are you for or against the bipartisan debt reduction plan by the gang of 6?
Obama showed no specifics just general information. Does Obama do tax cuts like the gang of 6?
'Gang of Six' revives hope for big deal in stalled debt-ceiling talks - CSMonitor.com
Looks like there might be a light at the end of the tunnel.
Or it's a train.
Obama just provided the framework and let the committee fill in the speciics. So you like the gang of 6 proposal but not Obama's plan it was based on? Interesting. As you wish then, glad you are happy with the gang of 6 plan! :sun
So now you are claiming that the Bowles-Simpson plan is based on a framework provided by Obama ?????
Obama just provided the framework and let the committee fill in the speciics. So you like the gang of 6 proposal but not Obama's plan it was based on? Interesting. As you wish then, glad you are happy with the gang of 6 plan! :sun
Im really not much of a fan of this plan. Yes it does have some good aspects, but all around not a fan...
No, if you had read my post, and the source I provided you would know that Obama's deficit reduction framework was based on the Bowles-Simpson plan, not the other way around.
Yeah, its far from ideal from a progressive perspective, but it also has to get passed through Congress. I don't see how a more liberal plan could make it through at this time, do you?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't bills have to originate in the house?
If that's the case, doesn't it make sense that Obama wouldn't present an actual "Bill" but a framework of what he is likely to accept from congress?
I don't see the democrats accepting the income tax cuts
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?