• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Further Proof Iran wants to takeover Iraq (1 Viewer)

Vader

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
8,260
Reaction score
1,064
Location
Whitewater, CO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Iran says U.S. departure would calm Iraq

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer 6 minutes ago

TEHRAN, Iran - Supreme Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the visiting Iraqi prime minister Wednesday that the way to end instability in Iraq is for U.S. forces to withdraw.

Source & Full Article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060913/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_iraq
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, we see Iran trying to push Iraq's shiite leadership to pressure the U.S. into withdrawing its forces. If we're going to stop Iran, we must do so now.
:shock:

We must take whatever action is necessary to prevent Iran's terrorist government from taking over Iraq...even if it means nuking Iran into ashes.

















 
Howd you go from a Libertarian to a Global Statist?

This is hardly an act of aggression worthy of invasion.
 
Lachean said:
Howd you go from a Libertarian to a Global Statist?

This is hardly an act of aggression worthy of invasion.

We cannot allow Iran to seize control of Iraq. Iran must be nuked before they can seize Iraq.

Under normal circumstances I would be totally non-violent; however, Iran's actions require special attention. Other then my previously outlined attack strategy; the best way to stop Iran from becoming a global threat is to do one or more of the following:

(1) Kill Iran's leadership (Specifically the Ayetoiletbowl and the mu-losers)
(2) Destroy Iran's infrastructure
(3) Impose an embargo on Iran that totally destroys Iran's economy
(4) Cut off all ties with countries that deal with Iran; including terminating their membership(s) in the UN Security Council.
 
You dont want them disarmed, you want them destroyed...

A nuke? For shame... I used to like you.
 
Lachean said:
You dont want them disarmed, you want them destroyed...

A nuke? For shame... I used to like you.

I want them disarmed but I do not know of other way to do it. I do not like bloodshed and I loathe violence; however, these people have made it clear that they will not negotiate. The have also made it abundantly clear that they want me dead because I am not a muslim.

How would you suggest we disarm these militants? Throw them a tea-party and ask them to check they coats and Katusha rockets at the door?
:2razz:
 
Vader said:
We cannot allow Iran to seize control of Iraq. Iran must be nuked before they can seize Iraq.

Under normal circumstances I would be totally non-violent; however, Iran's actions require special attention. Other then my previously outlined attack strategy; the best way to stop Iran from becoming a global threat is to do one or more of the following:

(1) Kill Iran's leadership (Specifically the Ayetoiletbowl and the mu-losers)
(2) Destroy Iran's infrastructure
(3) Impose an embargo on Iran that totally destroys Iran's economy
(4) Cut off all ties with countries that deal with Iran; including terminating their membership(s) in the UN Security Council.

Can we just skip to you taking off your helmet and dying before you blow up a few planets?
 
Vader said:
We cannot allow Iran to seize control of Iraq. Iran must be nuked before they can seize Iraq.

Under normal circumstances I would be totally non-violent; however, Iran's actions require special attention. Other then my previously outlined attack strategy; the best way to stop Iran from becoming a global threat is to do one or more of the following:

(1) Kill Iran's leadership (Specifically the Ayetoiletbowl and the mu-losers)
(2) Destroy Iran's infrastructure
(3) Impose an embargo on Iran that totally destroys Iran's economy
(4) Cut off all ties with countries that deal with Iran; including terminating their membership(s) in the UN Security Council.
Irans Infrastructure? HAHA IRAN IS POOR AS HELL. 60%of the population is youth and unemployed haha! ANd come on you pretty much want to make it a living hell for anyone who lives their.
 
nogoodname said:
Irans Infrastructure? HAHA IRAN IS POOR AS HELL. 60%of the population is youth and unemployed haha! ANd come on you pretty much want to make it a living hell for anyone who lives their.

Since Iran can afford a nuclear program and maintain one the biggest armies in the world. They also have a fortune in reserve that to their oil production I very much doubt Iran is as "poor as hell". Afghanistan, now they were as poor as hell.
 
Joby said:
Can we just skip to you taking off your helmet and dying before you blow up a few planets?

Oh, go pogo your way through a live mine field.

:mrgreen:
 
GarzaUK said:
Since Iran can afford a nuclear program and maintain one the biggest armies in the world. They also have a fortune in reserve that to their oil production I very much doubt Iran is as "poor as hell". Afghanistan, now they were as poor as hell.
No goverment wise their doing well because they hog it all for them selfs the people in Iran are poor as hell!
 
nogoodname said:
No goverment wise their doing well because they hog it all for them selfs the people in Iran are poor as hell!

That is why the Ayetollah and the mullahs need to die.
 
nogoodname said:
No goverment wise their doing well because they hog it all for them selfs the people in Iran are poor as hell!
There are a few very rich families and there are some people who own more and many people who own less and then there is a middle class in Iran. A lot of important things are subsidized and very affordable for people who don't have much money.

However, the social problems were very important in the 2005 elections, I guess. The reform politics of Mr. Rafsanjani made some things more problematic for the non rich and Mr. Ahmadinejad said, he will address it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom