The argument is elsewhere, you are getting off track. Now do you have something to actually say on point, or are you just here to tell me how totally not with the republicans you are. I already know where you are at in terms of supporting republican ideals. So please get back to the point which is not you.
I support Economically Conservative ideals. The Republicans have a whole range of social issues that are as irrelevant to government control as the social issues endorsed by the Democrats.
The Republicans stopped being Conservatives when they endorsed the intrusion of government into the private lives of individuals.
You started this thread saying that the rules of our legislature should be changed in order to promote the passage of a Continuing Resolution which would have been made unnecessary if the lying thieving whores in Congress has done their jobs six months ago and negotiated a budget which would have required that Harry Reid appoint conferees and that the two houses arrive at a compromise and sent the agreed to budget to the White House for that lying thieving whore to sign. Reid has not done this in five years. Maybe he doesn't know how.
Harry Reid never appointed the conferees. As a result, there was never a conference committee the conference committee never made recommendations.
If Reid had done his job, or if Obama had demanded that Reid do his job 6 MONTHS AGO, this would not have happened. The elected reps in the House have been trying to have a discussion on changes in Obmamacare which Obama has changed in major ways 17 times and he will not talk to them.
Honestly, if I was Boehner, I would not have been as courteous up to now and would certainly not be this courteous now. He seems to think that the office of the President deserves respect no matter how undeserving of that respect the occupant has proven himself to be. The Presesident has made it clear that he will not speak to the Republicans. If I'm Boenher, I return the favor and shut my door, too.
At least I'd be saving money in the short term.
Just wait until the debt ceiling.
Article 7 of the COTUS:
Section. 7.
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States:
If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it.
If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.
Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.
