From my research, it looks like New York state has a background check law similar to ours here in CA.

[Grandpappy]

If so, how in the hell did that murdering, mentally ill jackass pass it? Is the background check system that bad?

 

[Rucker61]

If so, how in the hell did that murdering, mentally ill jackass pass it? Is the background check system that bad?

Any disqualification from his mental illness episodes weren't reported by the state to NICS.

 

[Grandpappy]

Any disqualification from his mental illness episodes weren't reported by the state to NICS.

And he had more than one. Somebody effed up. Bad.

 

[TurtleDude]

Any disqualification from his mental illness episodes weren't reported by the state to NICS.

yet some clowns said we need background checks to stop that shooting!! I heard it all over the media

 

[Phys251]

If so, how in the hell did that murdering, mentally ill jackass pass it? Is the background check system that bad?

Research?

 

[TurtleDude]

And he had more than one. Somebody effed up. Bad.

To the bannerrhoids, the solution is private background checks, gun bans. mine is making sure the data base is complete

 

[TurtleDude]

Research?

View attachment 67391522

who is the twit you cite and why should anyone give a flying wazzooo what she thinks? She's a mental health counselor-not a PhD or a researcher. She didn't go to a major league university She's full of guano

 

[Phys251]

who is the twit you cite and why should anyone give a flying wazzooo what she thinks? She's a mental health counselor-not a PhD or a researcher. She didn't go to a major league university She's full of guano

Yet another worthless argumentum ad hominem from you. You are dismissed.

 

[Grandpappy]

From the New York State site relating to gun laws:

"Federal law requires federally licensed firearms dealers (but not private sellers) to initiate a background check on the purchaser prior to sale of a firearm. Federal law provides states with the option of serving as a state “point of contact” and conducting their own background checks using state, as well as federal, records and databases, or having the checks performed by the FBI using only the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) database. (Note that state files are not always included in the federal database.)"

The shitbag bought the AR at a gun store.

 

[TurtleDude]

Yet another worthless argumentum ad hominem from you. You are dismissed.

citing a nobody who has no credentials in an area in order to make a point is pathetically deficient

 

[Rucker61]

Research?

Is all of the crap that your meme author wrote necessary to conclude that California and New York have similar laws regarding background checks?

 

[Phys251]

Is all of the crap that your meme author wrote necessary to conclude that California and New York have similar laws regarding background checks?

^ Deflection.

 

[Lutherf]

Research?

And you "research" consists of a Twitter post. Awesome!

 

[Renae]

To the bannerrhoids, the solution is private background checks, gun bans. mine is making sure the data base is complete

A mass shooting, in a gun free zone... shocking.

 

[Phys251]

And you "research" consists of a Twitter post. Awesome!

^ And now we have a bald-faced lie.

Keep it up, righties, you're just making my point for me.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

If so, how in the hell did that murdering, mentally ill jackass pass it? Is the background check system that bad?

Obviously we need better, more thorough background checks, right?

 

[TurtleDude]

And you "research" consists of a Twitter post. Awesome!

a twittering twit citing a person who has no relevant academic credentials. in turn Phys claims the double twittery is telling. Hilarious

 

[TurtleDude]

Obviously we need better, more thorough background checks, right?

obviously the GOVERNMENT needs to do its job in data dissemination

 

[Grandpappy]

Obviously we need better, more thorough background checks, right?

YES!

 

[Rucker61]

^ Deflection.

It's the very research you're condemning.

 

[Rucker61]

Obviously we need better, more thorough background checks, right?

No, we need the people who have the information on someone who should be a prohibited person to submit the information correctly and timely to actually make that person a prohibited person.

 

[Phys251]

It's the very research you're condemning.

Yes, yes, keep on making my point for me.

 

[TurtleDude]

Yes, yes, keep on making my point for me.

what's that point-that you cannot fashion a reasonable argument so you find some moron on twitter who cites an irrelevant and worthless source for a point that really has no relevance? that's a triple fail on your part

 

[Gateman_Wen]

obviously the GOVERNMENT needs to do its job in data dissemination

Yup. Better, more thorough, background checks on all levels.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

No, we need the people who have the information on someone who should be a prohibited person to submit the information correctly and timely to actually make that person a prohibited person.

Yup. Better, more thorough, background checks on all levels.