Free speech and ALL speech needs to be allowed on Twitter, does that mean you believe that should included targeted hate speech against Jews?

[Spunkylama]

Is that why you employ them?
Thanks for letting everyone know.

If you couldn't see why your response above was laughable like the fact that he was un underage kid with an illegal gun out after hours in a town he didn't even live in and pretending to be a medical professional. All things he wasn't supposed to do doing. If Rittenhouse would have followed the law and not done those things, that person would still be alive today. Therefore he killed a person. If he wouldn't have been there he wouldn't have had to protect himself. Bad decisions (on both sides) resulted in a person dying. Now, you can disagree with this all you want. Doesn't change what happened or how Rittenhouse is seen today. Goodbye

 

[Excon]

If you couldn't see why your response above was laughable like the fact that he was un underage kid with an illegal gun out after hours in a town he didn't even live in and pretending to be a medical professional. All things he wasn't supposed to do doing. If Rittenhouse would have followed the law and not done those things, that person would still be alive today. Therefore he killed a person. If he wouldn't have been there he wouldn't have had to protect himself. Bad decisions (on both sides) resulted in a person dying. Now, you can disagree with this all you want. Doesn't change what happened or how Rittenhouse is seen today. Goodbye

You just lied a few times.
Nothing you said negates his use of deadly force in self defense.

 

[Excon]

If you couldn't see why your response above was laughable like the fact that he was un underage kid with an illegal gun out after hours in a town he didn't even live in and pretending to be a medical professional. All things he wasn't supposed to do doing. If Rittenhouse would have followed the law and not done those things, that person would still be alive today. Therefore he killed a person. If he wouldn't have been there he wouldn't have had to protect himself. Bad decisions (on both sides) resulted in a person dying. Now, you can disagree with this all you want. Doesn't change what happened or how Rittenhouse is seen today. Goodbye

"... un underage kid with an illegal gun" - false claims by you. he was allowed to be in possession of the firearm, nor was it illegal.

"after hours in a town he didn't even live in" after hours? wut? No actual curfew was in effect. and his place of residence is irrelevant.

"pretending to be a medical professional" While he did tell others that he was an EMT, at no time did he act as a medical professional or beyond his own training. So again, saying he was "pretending", just speaks to your own bias.
Nor is it relevant to his use of deadly force in self defense.

"All things he wasn't supposed to do doing." Opinion noted but not supported by the evidence.

Your position and thoughts are totally irrelevant.
He had every right to be there and to act as he did. Not only legal but also a noble endeavor on his part. But not for his attacker Rosenbaum engaging in an illegal act, none of this would have happened.

As for the other two people he shot - I can certainly agree that they may also have had noble intent behind there actions, but they were still in the wrong, and in no way negates his justified use of deadly force.

 

[HangLow]

I don't think Biden is a "great" anything. I took the lesser of two evils and I'm ok with that.
Still, several of your buddies still voted for the bloated disaster.
It is you who are divorced from reality, not I.
Twitter banned trump because he was endangering lives.
Period. Deal with it and quit all the whining.