• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

France- Yellow Vest Protesters are 'Too White', says CNN Producer

I assume you're referring to people like Alice Kantor, who throw around phrases like 'too white' while dying their hair a lighter color, and getting cosmetic surgery to look more Western European.

Hypocrisy knows no bounds
 
A white Frenchman protesting in France ........... truly abominable :shock:

I know. I thought the PC brainwashing was supposed to suppress their self preservation instinct keeping them from extinction. Something has gone drastically wrong in our calculations! Summon Herr Soros to the war room at once!
 
I know. I thought the PC brainwashing was supposed to suppress their self preservation instinct keeping them from extinction. Something has gone drastically wrong in our calculations! Summon Herr Soros to the war room at once!

I truly don't know how it got to this point with the yellow vests. I thought the frogs would never rebel against faggotry
 
I truly don't know how it got to this point with the yellow vests. I thought the frogs would never rebel against faggotry

I wouldn't phrase it that way. We once had a really good conservative poster from France on DP who did a brilliant job at debating the many PC European posters here. You have to realize that Europe criminalizes speech to such an extent, that conservatives can face jail time for even questioning what the EU, UN, and home country's government are doing.
 
~ You have to realize that Europe criminalizes speech to such an extent, that conservatives can face jail time for even questioning what the EU, UN, and home country's government are doing.

This comment is so stupid I would normally expect 100% laughter at it but "teh internetz" being what it is.......
 
This comment is so stupid I would normally expect 100% laughter at it but "teh internetz" being what it is.......

Which country's police force just called on its citizens to report offensive speech? Not libelous speech or death-threat speech, just plain old insulting speech. Speech that is merely hurtful or hateful. Which nation's cops instructed the citizenry to snitch on haters?

North Korea? China? Maybe Turkey?

It was Britain. Yes, Britain has become a nation in which offensive speech can become a police matter.


https://businessesgrow.com/2018/01/31/why-you-should-worry-about-europes-new-hate-speech-laws/

https://reason.com/archives/2018/09/15/britain-turns-offensive-speech-into-a-po

Glad the American could once again educate you about the continent you live on.
 
Last edited:
Which country's police force just called on its citizens to report offensive speech? Not libelous speech or death-threat speech, just plain old insulting speech. Speech that is merely hurtful or hateful. Which nation's cops instructed the citizenry to snitch on haters?

North Korea? China? Maybe Turkey?

It was Britain. Yes, Britain has become a nation in which offensive speech can become a police matter.


https://businessesgrow.com/2018/01/31/why-you-should-worry-about-europes-new-hate-speech-laws/

https://reason.com/archives/2018/09/15/britain-turns-offensive-speech-into-a-po

Glad the American could once again educate you about the continent you live on.



Yes - definitely a case that freedom of speech is restricted in the UK because of all the various PC related laws against 'hate' speech which cross a line into censorship. This issue is that 'hate' morphs seamlessly into causing offense. Thus if person A says something which upsets person B, especially if person B is from some privileged minority, then person A may have committed a 'hate' crime.

On the plus side, the UK's prisons are already full and the state doesn't want to build new ones because the official rhetoric is that crime is falling. So more and more people end up with criminal records but non custodial sentences. I don't have stats on the % of population who have criminal records, but it would be interesting.

But this obsession with not causing offence has other problems too. It causes mental health issues because young people are taught to be fearful of people upsetting them. There is a fear of fear, and a fear or causing fear. This culture creates weakness all round and is undermining the resilience of the whole state.
 
Yes - definitely a case that freedom of speech is restricted in the UK .................~
Coming from somebody that hails from the country of free speech, free press and general democratic principles, this just has to be the joke of the day.
 
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/france-yellow-vest-protests-white-190127223757928.html

Oh well, I guess the Gilet Jaunes protestors have no credibility then, because they're 'so white', according to CNN producer Alice Kantor, writing for Al Jazeera. It's interesting however that in an age where whites are told to stop seeing race when we look at crowds or individuals, that the Kantors of the world are certainly not going to follow that moral imperative anytime soon.

A French movement consisting of white French people, in a country that is predominantly white French? Something MUST be inherently racist in that, according to Kantor.

When is it EVER OK for a non-diverse clique of people belonging to the same identity group to congregate for the propulsion of ideas? Oh, I see one! :lamo

eight_col_REUTERS_montage_logos.jpg
logos.jpg



Alice Kantor-Freelance Journalist | Producer @cnn

https://mobile.twitter.com/alicekantor?lang=en
|

Alice Kantor - privileged white bitch with a degree from Bezerkley in socialism and anarchy. The world is steadily filling up with morons like her.
 
DxqzfBPWwAAc4wu.jpg


"Yellow vests" causing mayhem in Paris. Note the circled individual.....



Dxqzg_XW0AAuDDV.jpg


That is the Frenchman Mickael Takahashi who has fought for the Russians in Ukraine and Syria.
Every photo of the above has his face covered or nearly covered. The only way to prove this is if there is a fingerprint. You can find anyone that looks like anyone these days.
 
328622_1122406.jpg


On the bottom left ... Ghislain Lagrega



5c4582e88af7a.jpg


Ghislain Lagrega in Donbass. Yet another "Yellow vest" fighting for the Russians in eastern Ukraine. I'd say there is an excellent chance the Yellow Vest movement has been hijacked by Moscow.
 
328622_1122406.jpg


On the bottom left ... Ghislain Lagrega



5c4582e88af7a.jpg


Ghislain Lagrega in Donbass. Yet another "Yellow vest" fighting for the Russians in eastern Ukraine. I'd say there is an excellent chance the Yellow Vest movement has been hijacked by Moscow.
Not hijacked...created.

Sent from my Honor 8X using Tapatalk
 
Which country's police force just called on its citizens to report offensive speech? Not libelous speech or death-threat speech, just plain old insulting speech. Speech that is merely hurtful or hateful. Which nation's cops instructed the citizenry to snitch on haters?

North Korea? China? Maybe Turkey?

It was Britain. Yes, Britain has become a nation in which offensive speech can become a police matter.


https://businessesgrow.com/2018/01/31/why-you-should-worry-about-europes-new-hate-speech-laws/

https://reason.com/archives/2018/09/15/britain-turns-offensive-speech-into-a-po

Glad the American could once again educate you about the continent you live on.

From your first link - "Don’t post strong insults or unproven accusations, especially if they run the danger of (potentially) ruining a person’s reputation.The same is true for discriminating against groups based on their gender/ethnicity/religion/nationality. For example, claiming that group “X” is responsible for “Y” can get you in hot water. In general, the more specific your ‘inciting’ posts, the higher the risk of breaking the hate speech law."

Common sense stuff. This bit amused me - as it is the basis of most of your posts on this forum - "The same is true for discriminating against groups based on their gender/ethnicity/religion/nationality. For example, claiming that group “X” is responsible for “Y” can get you in hot water. In general, the more specific your ‘inciting’ posts, the higher the risk of breaking the hate speech law. The vaguer your posts are, the safer you tend to be. Implying instead of directly naming individuals and groups gives you more leeway."

That's you to a "T" and as for your second link - That's Brendan O'Neill. Any neutrals should just read his "Spiked" columns where he attacks "Remoaners" (people who voted to stay in the EU) and any ethnic minorities who rise up the greasy ladder to being in position over white people...
 
Alice Kantor - privileged white bitch with a degree from Bezerkley in socialism and anarchy. The world is steadily filling up with morons like her.

Hint: she doesn't identify as white.
 
From your first link - "Don’t post strong insults or unproven accusations, especially if they run the danger of (potentially) ruining a person’s reputation.

Which is subjective, and can be interpreted differently depending upon who's doing the interpreting. For example, when you and others say, 'white men make up most pedophiles', that has the potential to harm the reputatuion of white males. But these Orwellian rules regarding speech are never designed to protect white people anyway, especially the dreaded white males. They're mostly used to target them, and to force them into submitting to a Britain of lowered standards.

Could you even comment about the epidemic of child deformities in Britain caused by cousin marriages, and the financial burdens on the healthcare system? I guess that would depend upon whether you identified those responsible. Don't want to receive that 'tap on the shoulder' that UK police threaten. Best to be vague.
 
Hint: she doesn't identify as white.

Really? Another Rachel Dolezal wannabe? What is wrong with these women? Why can't they just identify as superior to their husbands like Hillary and let the rest of the insanity go?
 
Which is subjective, and can be interpreted differently depending upon who's doing the interpreting. For example, when you and others say, 'white men make up most pedophiles', that has the potential to harm the reputatuion of white males. But these Orwellian rules regarding speech are never designed to protect white people anyway, especially the dreaded white males. They're mostly used to target them, and to force them into submitting to a Britain of lowered standards.

Could you even comment about the epidemic of child deformities in Britain caused by cousin marriages, and the financial burdens on the healthcare system? I guess that would depend upon whether you identified those responsible. Don't want to receive that 'tap on the shoulder' that UK police threaten. Best to be vague.

You don't get away with moronic statements and then challenge me to disprove something that is actually easy to find facts on. Where free speech should not be challenged is where facts are concerned rather than opinion.

In the UK, most paedophiles will be white men. That is verifiable fact. I'm not going to bother posting fact based articles for you yet again as you never read them, you myopically see the word Asian and no other thought is able to enter your head.
In the UK, most grooming gangs paedophiles will be made up of Asian men in gangs. That is verifiable fact. I'm not going to bother posting fact based articles for you yet again as you never read them, you myopically see the word Asian and no other thought is able to enter your head.
In the UK, over 700 deformed children are born every year to Pakistani heritage parents due to first cousin marriage. That is verifiable fact and nobody goes to prison for saying so - Channel 4 has broadcast a documentary on the problem and nobody went to prison for it and nobody involved in making it will. In 2008, Phil Woolas mentioned this and though the MPAC stupidly turned fire on him for raising the issue he still walks around as a free man.

I typed a whole lot of words, let's see if you can get around the myopic approach you traditionally use and discuss rationally.
 
Really? Another Rachel Dolezal wannabe? What is wrong with these women? Why can't they just identify as superior to their husbands like Hillary and let the rest of the insanity go?

Getting warmer marke, but her particular disorder is even more bizarre than Dolezal's. You see, I've often heard those of Ms Kantor's background state that they don't consider themselves to be white, rather they consider themselves to be a race that science hasn't even discovered yet, outside of a quacks. It's very confusing, and most people are unaware it.
 
Getting warmer marke, but her particular disorder is even more bizarre than Dolezal's. You see, I've often heard those of Ms Kantor's background state that they don't consider themselves to be white, rather they consider themselves to be a race that science hasn't even discovered yet, outside of a quacks. It's very confusing, and most people are unaware it.

Weird.

Barbarians antifa savage complaining that there is a US flag on his ebt card.jpg
 
You see, I've often heard those of Ms Kantor's background state that they don't consider themselves to be white, rather they consider themselves to be a race that science hasn't even discovered yet, outside of a quacks.

Memo to you and marke: There is no such thing as a "white" race.
 
Could you even comment about the epidemic of child deformities in Britain caused by cousin marriages, and the financial burdens on the healthcare system?

Epidemic? Please provide the epidemiological evidence as that would be interesting.

I once knew a British guy who married his Italian cousin. They didn't meet until they were adults and hence were strangers, so you can see how a romantic relationship wasn't impossible. Their kids turned out fine, but then apparently the risks have been overstated greatly:

https://www.popsci.com/marrying-cousins-genetics

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...s-getting-married-scientists-say-1210072.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/04/us/few-risks-seen-to-the-children-of-1st-cousins.html




So please do provide us the proof of this burden to the British HNS, because I was never aware of it when I worked in the system, and my old colleagues and friends still practising in the British NHS don't seem to be overwhelmed by it either.

I guess that would depend upon whether you identified those responsible.

Cousins marrying was very common in many western societies and still happens. I metioned the Brit I knew and his Italian cousin. Cousins marrying in Italy was once not that uncommon, and still happens since it is permitted by Italian law and with a bishop's consent, by the Catholic Church.

Italians are usually white and usually Christian. Am I thus supposed to make some broad sweeping generalisations about white Christians? Just askin' :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom