• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Fox News: Hunter Biden Story Debunked

I agree - a team of reporters or else censorship!!! A team of dishonest deplorables who can't manage to pdf documents, with the star witness deep in debt, and working with the GOP to shop his story made an allegation!!!! This allegation DEMANDS non-stop coverage through the election. BIDEN MIGHT HAVE TOLD A LIE!!!
I already posted Ross Douthat's take, with which I agree completely, so I won't belabor the point. But make no mistake, principles and duties are being abandoned. I fear the country will pay a price for that later.
 
I already posted Ross Douthat's take, with which I agree completely, so I won't belabor the point. But make no mistake, principles and duties are being abandoned. I fear the country will pay a price for that later.
Right, you want more coverage, so it's censorship and a failure of the press's duty to give wall to wall coverage to poorly sourced allegations spread by a cast of lying deplorables, in the days leading up to a major election.

The way I see it is someone had this hard drive a year ago. If there was a 'scandal' contained in it that actually mattered, versus an October surprise right wing rat****ing operation, it would have come out long ago. I'm certainly not obligated to take seriously crappily sourced, non-specific allegations by obvious partisan hacks a week before an election. Seems kind of idiotic to do so IMO. Seems most of "the press" agrees.
 
Right, you want more coverage, so it's censorship and a failure of the press's duty to give wall to wall coverage to poorly sourced allegations spread by a cast of lying deplorables, in the days leading up to a major election.

The way I see it is someone had this hard drive a year ago. If there was a 'scandal' contained in it that actually mattered, versus an October surprise right wing rat****ing operation, it would have come out long ago. I'm certainly not obligated to take seriously crappily sourced, non-specific allegations by obvious partisan hacks a week before an election. Seems kind of idiotic to do so IMO. Seems most of "the press" agrees.
That's because most of the press are abandoning their principles. I suspect they will regret that.
 
"Today I sent my intention to resign from The Intercept, the news outlet I co-founded in 2013 with Jeremy Scahill and Laura Poitras, as well as from its parent company First Look Media.

The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors, in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom, censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression. . . . "

My Resignation From The Intercept

Glenn Greenwald, Substack
 
Sorry to all the Trump supporters depending on this story to make a difference in this election cycle, it no longer has ANY credibility.

On Wednesday night’s show, Tucker Carlson reported that his team had acquired incriminating documents. However, they sent them from Washington to Los Angeles, and the documents disappeared. And they neglected to make any copies. So now the only copy of the documents that would nail the probable next president of the United States are gone:

Interesting
 
I've said many times that abuse of power or influence peddling may not always be illegal so I asked if anything looked looked ethically unsavory to any of you.
Apparently it did because you all danced around the question and fell back on the absence of indictments at this time.
I can't blame you given the united strong media effort to keep a lid on the fetid story of the Biden clan and as a group you don't seem eager to learn more.
OGC.7d66a41eeef8c134e3c7f084d86eb2ad


But you should be asking yourself, why would Joe think he had to lie about not knowing anything about Hunter's business dealings if there's no issue with it?

The problem becomes national if a Country like, say, Red China knows some things about a family like the Bidens that have been kept secret by a complicit media and one of that family becomes President. UhOh. And given Joe's past statements about China it looks like he knew not to ruffle China's avifauna.
So you have no direct quotes.
 
I've read the emails, and they show nothing. Who cares who "verified" them? What's the scandal? What corrupt act do the emails provide evidence of happening? Oh, right, nothing.

But the NOTHINGBURGER EMAILS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED!!! SCANDAL!!! :ROFLMAO:
That's an interesting way of looking at it. Though I don't think it's good that you'd be so willing to accept such a corrupt politician, after what? Three years spent bitching and moaning about Trump...
 
They have NOT been verified by law enforcement.


Deny that
I said nothing about "law enforcement" verifying the emails.

So good luck attempting to move that particular goal post.

Either way, it's still proving to be a rather fantastic shit show for the Bidens.
I hope Joe learns to shove his son into a rehab clinic, before using him to line his own pockets.
 
I said nothing about "law enforcement" verifying the emails.

So good luck attempting to move that particular goal post.

Either way, it's still proving to be a rather fantastic shit show for the Bidens.
I hope Joe learns to shove his son into a rehab clinic, before using him to line his own pockets.
Yeah it's a nothing burger. I agree
 
Yeah it's a nothing burger. I agree
The only one saying "nothing burger" this time around, is your camp Vegas.
Then again, all these years about harping about corruption as it pertains to Trump. I didn't think your little group would sell it's collective soul and take in with Biden's own corruptness..

It's strange, sad and somewhat poetic. Especially given all of the crap that your camp has advocated for all this time.
 
The only one saying "nothing burger" this time around, is your camp Vegas.
Then again, all these years about harping about corruption as it pertains to Trump. I didn't think your little group would sell it's collective soul and take in with Biden's own corruptness..

It's strange, sad and somewhat poetic. Especially given all of the crap that your camp has advocated for all this time.
Actually most people with a brain see this as a nothing burger. Certainly the fbi that has had this for 10 months sees this as a nothing burger.

Yaaaaaawn
 
Actually most people with a brain see this as a nothing burger. Certainly the fbi that has had this for 10 months sees this as a nothing burger.

Yaaaaaawn
Good to see that you still accept corruption when it's your guy at the helm. Have fun dying on that hill.
 
Good to see that you still accept corruption when it's your guy at the helm. Have fun dying on that hill.
Corruption is illegal. Prove it. Oh wait you cant.

And thus I yaaaaaawn
 
Good to see that you still accept corruption when it's your guy at the helm. Have fun dying on that hill.
What 'corruption' are you referring to, specifically?
 
Ah, good to see that you just decided to run from the other discussion.

Either way, as to the corruption aspect. It's come to our attention that Biden is possibly using his own children as intermediaries, to receive money from unlawful positions.
Given his position, does that not seem like corruption to some extent?
 
Ah, good to see that you just decided to run from the other discussion.

Either way, as to the corruption aspect. It's come to our attention that Biden is possibly using his own children as intermediaries, to receive money from unlawful positions.
Given his position, does that not seem like corruption to some extent?
If only there was some evidence....lol
 
Strange, doesn't stop the lot of you from crying about it.
How many comprise this 'lot' you speak of who are "crying about it". A guesstimate is fine, of course.
 
Ah, good to see that you just decided to run from the other discussion.

Either way, as to the corruption aspect. It's come to our attention that Biden is possibly using his own children as intermediaries, to receive money from unlawful positions.
Given his position, does that not seem like corruption to some extent?
In America, people are considered to be innocent until 'proven' guilty. "Possibly" means nothing when determining guilt or innocence. The answer to your asinine question is a resounding 'NO'!
 
Back
Top Bottom