• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Doesn't Want to Say Porn Star + Stormy Daniels

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Fox News frequently also ignores Trump dumb twitter habits, and never criticizes him for them. Also during weekends it seems Trump watches Fox News all day. There's been times when I'm watching the network, and then an hour later the President tweets something one of the hosts says. Sometimes it's live tweeting too.

Now the stormy thing is interesting, but before you say, it's VOX! blah, blah, blah fake news. Please try to actually argue a literate point and try to find a time when Fox News has mentioned Stormy. Also an analysis about all the times Fox News mentioned Clinton VS Stormy would be helpful in your arguments that Vox and not Fox is fake news.

There is something [else] Fox News really doesn’t want on air, and it’s this: President Trump’s name uttered in the same sentence as the words “porn star” or “Stormy Daniels.”
Click to expand...


https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144180/fox-news-stormy-daniels-porn-trump

I do realize that in the article CNN's Stormy graph looks like a erect penis. That's hilarious. But that's probably just because they're the ones who've been getting all the interviews w/her and avenatti. I'm sure Fox could fight for them if they wanted to. It's clear they don't.
 
Last edited:

...and the importance of her being a "porn star named Stormy Daniels" to the narrative is? :roll:

I thought the left was all about opposing the "objectification" of women?

He had an adulterous one-night-stand with a woman named Stephanie Clifford, whose "professional name" is Stormy Daniels. That is a fact.

So because they are not being as salaciously negative as the rest of the MSM in reporting her stage name and profession, this is somehow fake news or propaganda?
 

For your argument to be true. There must be loads of content of Fox & Friends, Hannity, and Carlson saying Stephanie Clifford. I'll wait for the video links.
 
Why not just call her a "whore." That accurately describes all of her career activities.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
For your argument to be true. There must be loads of content of Fox & Friends, Hannity, and Carlson saying Stephanie Clifford. I'll wait for the video links.
Click to expand...

No, in order for you to be right, there has to be no mention in Fox News.

For my argument to be true there only has to be mention of her in some Fox News reports.

Okay:

Stormy Daniels claims she?s free to talk about Trump, after payment admission | Fox News

Stormy Daniels claims she was threatened to stay silent about alleged Trump affair | Fox News

Stormy Daniels coy about whether she really signed denial statement on Trump affair | Fox News

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti an 'adrenaline junkie' who learned at the knee of Rahm Emanual | Fox News

They are just not making as big a story about it as the rest of the MSN, maybe because (IMO) they are not trying to emulate the National Enquirer about something that has nothing to do with his being President? :shrug:
 
HowardBThiname said:
Why not just call her a "whore." That accurately describes all of her career activities.
Click to expand...

Well then why don’t you refer to the “accurate” labeling that trump had a adulterous and unprotected sex with the whore then?
 

It has everything to do with him being president since he possibly had her paid off with campaign funds. It’s hilsrious watching the right excuse trump when they have spent the better part of two decades whining about bill clinton having an affair.
 

WRONG. They are just bashing her. The three stories above were all bashing her or questioning her story. Only the first even pretended to be neutral. And it does have everything to do w/him being President since the silencing happened right before the election. Imagine if any other politician did this, you'd be livid.

Also we are mainly talking about Fox Prime time. The website is actually not terrible.
 
Last edited:

lol...really Cap'n? Really really? I mean, I know that Fox News is the epitome of exemplary in the department of not being salacious with their negativity but...

:lamo

...sorry, just can't. And neither can you, sorry bud, you know it, I know it, we all know it. Not saying any of your other news venues are any better, but let's not get carried away re: Fox...doesn't look good on ya, pal...
 
HowardBThiname said:
Why not just call her a "whore." That accurately describes all of her career activities.
Click to expand...

All legal an honest.
Can't even begin to say the same thing about our ***** grabber in Chief.

It's a sad day in the USA when the majority of the world finds a sex worker more credible than the "president" of the USA.
 

Anything to spin the negativity. That's 50% of the conservative media these days. The reality bending is honesty very good.
 
Praxas said:
Well then why don’t you refer to the “accurate” labeling that trump had a adulterous and unprotected sex with the whore then?
Click to expand...

Did Trump admit to that? We know Stormy is a whore because she admitted to it.
 


That her public name is Stormy Daniels in the way any movie personality is known by a stage name, and that she is a porn star who not only had a sexual relationship with the President, but was
legally silenced by him for money, is the narrative, a narrative that is inherently "salacious". Stormy "objectifies" herself, does it gladly, and maintains her personal integrity at the same time. She's great. And she's obviously an embarrassment to Fox which, yes, is all about propagandizing the Trump presidency.
 
HowardBThiname said:
Did Trump admit to that? We know Stormy is a whore because she admitted to it.
Click to expand...

She admitted that she had unprotected sex with Trump. For that to be true that means Trump had an adulterous and unprotected sex with a whore. Stormy couldn't violate her NDA unless what she was saying is true.

But be honest. If all that were true you would STIL support Trump just like allllllll the other Trump supporters who many complained about Clinton having an affair.
 


Actually, I don't care about who is ****ing anyone else. Their business, not mine. What I do care about is when whores come out of the woodwork and try to make a buck on a former John (whether the story is real or not). That's not information for public consumption and it needs to remain private. The same thing happened to Bill Clinton over that stupid blue dress. The whole thing was a setup.
 

I care whether or not he used campaign funds to pay off the whore whom he had an adulterous and unprotected sex with. I care if his campaign intentionally intimidated someone to shut up about the affair and if you really cared about the integrity of our government’s elections you would too.
 

If he used campaign funds, that is a no-no, but, according to his attorney, he didn't. If he intimated someone, that's also a no-no, but there's no evidence that he did.

That still leaves us with a whore who's obviously trying to blackmail for money.
 

Actually both of those are not known whether his lawyer is telling the truth. If the lawyer lied about the first then it’s entirely possible either trump ordered his lawyer to or his lawyer had someone to do the intimidating. Either way there is smoke and the investigation will show if there is fire.
 

Lots of speculation going on there - but - as you say, it will come out in an investigation.
 
HowardBThiname said:
Lots of speculation going on there - but - as you say, it will come out in an investigation.
Click to expand...

Well trump has lied so many times about this that of course there is speculation on all sides because no one knows if he is telling the truth since he lied about the affair to begin with and has lied about so many other small and big things. The man is a pathelogical liar.
 

I think most men would like about an affair. At least at first. The sad thing is watching the biblical types latching onto it. As if they've never done anything wrong.
 

Possibly, according to who?

Possibly implies something else may be true.

Clinton did have an affair, That's no longer a possibly.
 

one happened 12 years BEFORE taking office

the other took place inside the oval office

can you see the difference?

probably not...nevermind
 
gdgyva said:
one happened 12 years BEFORE taking office

the other took place inside the oval office

can you see the difference?

probably not...nevermind
Click to expand...

Did you bother to actually read what I said? Nope so move on if you're just going to bother actually reading. The cover up allegedly happened before the election so it is relevant. Go pound sand if you don't like it. You can tell trump ass kissers are getting nervous.
 
jimbo said:
Possibly, according to who?

Possibly implies something else may be true.

Clinton did have an affair, That's no longer a possibly.
Click to expand...

Possibly according to whom you ask? Seriously, that's the best you can do. It's been stated many many times so now you are acting dumb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…