- Jan 29, 2015
- Reaction score
- North East
- Political Leaning
Former top FBI lawyer: Yes, Hillary should have been indicted for her ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info
The FBI’s former top lawyer told a House committee during closed-door testimony that former secretary of state and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton most definitely should have been indicted for mishandling classified information.
As reported by the Epoch Times, during testimony in October, Baker (above, center) told lawmakers that the bureau’s investigation into purposed “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia — Spygate — was “highly unusual” and replete with abnormalities.
“I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual,” Baker told lawmakers, according to a transcript of his testimony obtained by the news site.
Baker’s response came after he was confronted with a series of procedural abnormalities, obvious bias, and omissions of evidence and key findings.
In October, The National Sentinel reported that Baker had offered lawmakers the FBI under then-Director James Comey engaged in “abnormal” handling of the investigation....
According to transcripts from Oct. 3 and Oct. 18 seen by the Epoch Times, Baker told lawmakers that, even up to the end of the Clinton investigation, he believed she should have been charged for her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.... The email marked “secret” was written by noted anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok, the bureau’s former No. 2 counterintelligence official who has since been fired. “Documents provided to the Committees show foreign actors obtained access to some of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — including at least one email classified ‘Secret,’” said the memo. — Jon Dougherty
“Mishandle” is an awfully tame term for selling every goddamn national security secret that crossed her desk to the Chinese.
Former FBI agent James Baker said, "Yes, Hillary should have been indicted over ‘appalling’ mishandling of classified info. Hillary Clinton didn't "mishandle" classified information, she compromised every bit of it.
The irony of this is that, in covering up the Hillary's crimes, Obama assured the Democrats’ 2016 defeat. If she’d either been prosecuted or forced out of the contest for the nomination, another individual without her obvious, glaring weaknesses would have been nominated, giving them a far better chance to keep the presidency.
I’ve always wondered why, especially because the situation was so obvious. My only answer to it was, and remains, that the Clintons had, and must continue to have, a tremendous amount of highly damaging information about both of the Barry and Michelle was squeezed out of the Illinois bar of Law after only about four years of practice. Obama himself has totally obscured and concealed his dubious academic records using Perkins-Coie. Those records have been mostly in the custody of this ageing, bitter female, who would have been happy to spill the beans if she didn't get her way. In short, it looks like the Clintons blackmailed Obama into giving her the nomination, even though the likelihood of oncoming disaster was obvious.
The upshot to this massive blackmail of Obama only adds to the violation of law by the Clinton's has been the tremendous loss of revenue going into the Clinton Foundation(s) along with the loss of the presidency.
Will James Baker's testimong see more light of day? The biased MSM has made it their business to bury the truth....