• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

forced reduction of population sec. (1 ot 2) (1 Viewer)

obstragite

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
An Obstragite View (Sec. 1 of 2)
5.8 billion people are going to be purposefully killed during a one year period beginning 7-12 months from now. The base reason isThere is just no possible way to keep the environment of this planet from redlining without a massive reduction of human population. Redline meaning the point where all human life dies. Media is allowed to focus on global warming because it is a single component of the problem that has debatable solutions. The toxin outputs and acceleration rate of expansion in manufacturing has no solution that keeps the people. Redline would be reached long before the ice melts. Virtually all manufacturing causes toxins to be added to the environment. From Rice Crispies to the cabinet maker down the street and everything in-between. If it is made by man it has a toxin output caused by the production of it. All economic growth is synonymous with expansion in manufacturing. The earth can neutralize any toxin man puts out. But the process has a maximum rate. Once the toxin outputs overtake the rate they can be brought back to safe levels, accumulation begins. We passed that point more than 60 years ago. It’s been a runaway train going down hill since. Take a look at the freeway next time your on it. Not just the number of cars, the manufacturing of plastics, adhesives, oil, gas, steel, the buildings and houses, everything around you. See it, fell it, this is reality. There is no scientific study or cleaner gas or electric car that can make what you see less, which is the only thing that will help. You know expansion will make it more next week and the week after at a continuously accelerating rate world wide. Expansion has to be stopped and reversed, tragically, terribly the design of human existence only allows one possible way to stop and reverse expansion. Remove the human it would expand to and the relative number it has already reached. Accept for a moment, hypothetically if you like, that this is the reality of over population in relation to the environment. Either a reduction takes place or everybody dies. Given this circumstance, what decision do you think the top power people in the world would make.
The power core of the industrialized world. The few hundred people that actually make the top level decisions are going to implement this reduction before this time next year. This will be their second attempt and this time they will accomplish it. More than 30 years ago secret studies on toxin outputs and expansion rates made the necessity of this reduction unquestionable. Once the fact it has to happen is backed by the scientific data, then the projected date redline would be reached becomes secondary, a before date only. First is how many people have to be eliminated. The earth can maintain an ideal environment for 500 million people being continuously supplied with manufactured goods. In order to re-start expansion in a controlled form so the same situation can never occur again 200 million is the starting number needed. The tragic number required to be eliminated shows how far over it has gone. How to accomplish it, who lives fore sure, who is left to random numerics, what form societies will take in the aftermath, of course making sure perceived enemies don’t survive. The mechanics of the plan take precedence in dictating timing. Their first attempt was aids. The size of the virus, its mutation factor, the length of time it took to kill and the fact that other diseases actually killed the ones infected, should have kept it from being isolated until billions were infected. With this many infected saliva transmittable sub strains would have materialized ( kissing and sharing food or drink). Right about now it was supposed to be all over with. But a Japanese scientist isolated the tiny virus way to soon, he even took a picture of it penetrating a T-cell. At that time society was told that monkeys past the virus to humans. But it was found soon enough for the scientific community to establish the origin. 80 thousand doses of diphtheria vaccine that went to Africa and 5 thousand doses of hepatitis vaccine that went to New York. The world health origination then acknowledged modifying the monkey virus to replicate with human D.N.A.. They said they did it so they could look for a cure in case it passed from monkeys to humans. They said the vaccines that started the epidemic were accidentally contaminated with the human strain. These admissions were made at a televised medical science conference assembled for explanation when the origin was found. With no reason present why anyone would release such a virus on purpose the ludicrous answers were all there was. It wasn’t that the scientists accepted them it was the only answers they were going to get. Further media focus was for the most part cut off. A blatant attempt to kill over 90% of the world population, claiming an impossible accident and the mechanism to do anything about it doesn’t even exist. The power in play is truly amazing. (if you missed the televised conference you can find the origin of the aids epidemic on the web, not the origin of aids, the origin of the aids epidemic).
They made mistakes with aids that they aren’t going to make again. This time their going to use a rapid killer that is as close as possible to 100% fatal. They’ve been developing and testing it for a few years now. Laying the foundation of innocence telling society to get ready for a pandemic. I believe the pathogen is ready now. The 8 member family in Indonesia passed the infection from person to person and they all died while getting treatment. Also they had no connection to poultry. (Virus) don’t try to become fatal or harmless. The odds against a virus going from less than 10% fatal to 100% fatal in four months are astronomical unless the virus is being modified by man. If the virus has been spliced with pieces of the West Nile so it can be transmitted by mosquitoes it will be a formidable killer indeed. I believe a mosquito, bird, human to human transmitted virus is the only combination that can accomplish their desired scale of reduction. West Nile gave them the natural infection routs world wide. All other areas will be covered by releasing infected mosquitoes. They’re going to release the virus then pull in the doormat for a year. It will spread fast enough to cause fear enough to stop people from going to work. Once the trucks stop moving, that’s it. In America 280 million people run out of food and water in a week. By the third week their killing each other over supplies that remain. Initially thirst, starvation and chaos will take far more lives than the virus. At 5 months the people that are still alive will be in conditions that verbal description can’t adequately relay. By the year mark 280 million people will be dead in America, similar percentages world wide, some countries much higher. (continued sec 2)
 
this is why brothers and sisters should never mate....:roll:
 
obstragite, you have sent your sci-fi film idea to the wrong place.

But seriously, this is a conspiracy theory of the rarest kind: one that has a date in it: 7 - 12 months from now is April 2007 to September 2007.

Here is my prediction: come Sept 2007, either obstragite will have disappeared or will be making even wilder claims why the population reduction has not happened (aliens killed the scientists or some such story.)

As for the text, it is so full of holes, you could market it as a new type of swiss cheese.

I have made a note in my diary to revisit this thread in April 2007, to see how the death and destruction is getting on.
 
Tom Clancy already covered this in his Fiction novel Rainbow Six.
 
obstragite said:
An Obstragite View (Sec. 1 of 2)
5.8 billion people are going to be purposefully killed during a one year period beginning).........

I love a good conspiracy theory, but I'm not even going to read that until you clean up the grammar, format the paragraphs so that it's much easier to read, and most importantly, give a link to your source (I check out the link before reading a conspiracy post).
 
The Population Bomb - Link

"The Population Bomb - Link"

One global cataclysmic event and then it is cuss and spit.

My favorite part of the article is, "There has been much criticism of the book from demographers today (chiefly Phillip Longman in his 2004 The Empty Cradle) who argue that the "baby boom" of the 1950s was an aberration unlikely to be repeated and that population decline in an urbanized society is by nature hard to prevent because of the economic liability children become."

Sure, stop breeding, accumulate wealth, then lose it to the socialist poor growing from the secret agenda of illegals to out populate and out vote the reigning majority.
 
to keep the environment of this planet from redlining without a massive reduction of human population.
The critics have been saying we were suppose to be done by 2000 also and hey, you claimed that AI and robotics can do the job a decade ago for half of the population? Then we have a solution then, let technology save us and harvest that cabbage--that way we can save calories and hence eat less food.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom