- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 17,160
- Reaction score
- 6,852
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
...this is why:
Sometimes 6 is not enough to stop a threat.
Sometimes 6 is not enough to stop a threat.
...this is why:
Sometimes 6 is not enough to stop a threat.
Comparing an unarmed man being shot in the back 7 times with a guy attacking a cop with a machete is desperate and pathetic. These two situations are not even remotely equivalent.
Comparing an unarmed man being shot in the back 7 times with a guy attacking a cop with a machete is desperate and pathetic. These two situations are not even remotely equivalent.
...this is why:
Sometimes 6 is not enough to stop a threat.
Then why are you comparing the two? The OP didn't.
Comparing an unarmed man being shot in the back 7 times with a guy attacking a cop with a machete is desperate and pathetic. These two situations are not even remotely equivalent.
I feel like you may be jumping to a conclusion here.
How can we be sure that the machete wielding maniac actually intended to do any harm to the cops or anyone else?
Did he actually cut anyone?
Seems to me he was just out jogging, minding his own business, performing some machete yoga moves, when the cop shooting at him happened to fall down in the street.
Obvious example of unjustified force being used by the cops.
(the above is sarcasm)
Freudian slip much?
Then why are you comparing the two? The OP didn't.
The jogger argument was debunked months ago. He was actually robbing them. Change your channel off of CNN.You're trying to group an unarmed jogger being shot by a hill billy civilian and an unarmed black guy being shot in the back 7 times with a violent, machete wielding attacker that's actively attacking a cop. You're dishonest and transparent.
Not sure what's hard to understand about not wanting the cops to blast unarmed civilians that didn't pose a threat. Literally nobody has said cops shouldn't defend themselves when attacked.
The OP is absolutely trying to compare the two. The 7 shots thing is not a coincidence.
No one is wondering, we know why:
He wanted to murder the Black guy.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The jogger argument was debunked months ago. He was actually robbing them. Change your channel off of CNN.
The mind-reader speaks.
Yeah, that is exactly why their hillbilly asses are in jail now.
No one is wondering, we know why:
He wanted to murder the Black guy.
Stop with the deliberate dishonesty.
So you chose to double down on lying. Figures.Stop with the hero cop worship. The gig is up.
So you chose to double down on lying. Figures.
So you again chose the lying route. Typical.And now you’re trying to worship cops even harder.
So you again chose the lying route. Typical.
I think the 7 shots to the back of the Black unarmed guy,
while aiding and abetting the armed white lunatic
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200828/4686991948b9abe9fb6d460c1db887b0.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
What do you think you are accomplishing?
What do you think you are accomplishing?
He wasn't unarmed, and as the video that I posted shows, you can shoot a guy 7 times and still easily get killed by him.
God know what the AF you're even ranting about.
So that is what causes you to post such nonsense.Underlining cognitive dissonance.
Thank you for the tacit admission to trolling.Dunno if it’s actually accomplishing anything, per se, but I get a chuckle.