chuck71
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- Pulaski Tn
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Not to speak for stonewall50, but I drive a Ford, not a Dodge. Anyway, that's irrelevant to this discussion. He was entirely correct in pointing out the essential distinction between a right and a privilege, and you are entirely wrong in dismissing this distinction.
We have a rational gun law. One law, and it is all we need, and all that we should have.
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
When people like yourself speak of “rational gun laws”, what you speak of are not rational at all, but irrational and corrupt efforts to violate the one supreme law that we have on the subject.
:mrgreen: Bob I like the way you put the last part in bold letters, because everything up to and including the 2nd comma is a 'Participle Phrase', meant to enhance but not alter or modify in any way the words that follow it. tks, chuck