• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

"Flight 93" is beng shown "too soon"??? (1 Viewer)

Little-Acorn

Banned
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
216
Reaction score
5
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I keep hearing from various TV and radio p[undits, speculation on the idea that the movie "Flight 93", about the plane hijacked on 9/11 where the passengers fought back agains the hijackers and the plane wound up crashing in Pennsylvania, might be showing "too soon", that "America isn't ready for it".

In what alternate reality do those critics exist?

The best time to have shown that movie, would have been about Sept. 18, 2001. One week after the horrific events themselves. Would have been a little tough to have the movie ready that fast, of course. But that would have been the best time, had it been possible.

Now it's more than FOUR YEARS after the event. When, exactly, do these people think would be the right time, if now is "too soon"? What will happen between now and that "right time", to make it right while "now" is wrong?

I almost get the feeling they want to put off any showing of what happened on that date, until long after it can have any effect on the American public. Say, in about 70 years, when most people old enough to have remembered it, are gone. Sort of like bringing out the "Pearl Harbor" movie with affleck, sixty years after the event itself.

Do they feel that we don't want America getting angry at the people who perpetrated the massively gruesome events of 9/11, all over again? Why, that would only make it more difficult for us to get along with them, more difficult to accommodate their rightful place among us.

Excuse me, but perhaps getting mad at them over those events, is exactly what we DO need, to properly deal with the people whose plans have not changed and whose goals remain the same against us. Perhaps letting a cooling-off period go by, is precisely the WRONG thing to do now... no matter how desired by the go-along-to-get-along crowd. Sure, we can forget about the hatred and venom they hold for us, and the deeds that hatred has already driven them to do. But they won't forget. They certainly didn't forget in the runup to 9/11 - and what has changed since then, to make them forget their hatred since then?

Sorry, Charlie. "Flight 93" is exactly what we DO need now... almost as much as we needed it just after 9/11. The American people needed to be reminded, as often and as starkly as possible, exactly what the Islamic fanatics intend for us. "Flight 93" does that very well. We also need movies titled "The 104th Floor" and "North Tower" and "Target: Pentagon", to keep reminding us of actual reality: the fact that there are people who have inflicted mass murder on a historic scal upon us, and desire nothing but more of the same.

Bring it on.
 
GREAT MOVIE.

no political agenda. just factual events of what transpired that day.

truth be known, the problem the "critics" have with it is just that.....that it has no agenda.
 
ProudAmerican said:
GREAT MOVIE.

no political agenda. just factual events of what transpired that day.

truth be known, the problem the "critics" have with it is just that.....that it has no agenda.
Wrong...This is the critics major problem with it...

"How dare you force us to remember."
 
Actually the film has a bit of an agenda in this.... they are donating a portion of box office sales to the Flight 93 memorial fund. I think just the other day I saw they gave 1.5 million, or thereabouts, to the fund, that is desperately needing money. It seems ONE politician is blocking a proposed bill to fund the memorial from coming out of committee.

So to the media, and those who say America is NOT ready... I say this... America has ALWAYS been ready... been ready for the heroism of the passangers and crew of Flight 93, who, in the face of death, made sure that the plane could not, and would not reach it's destination.
 
no political agenda.

Considering that it comes out now and not the weekend before the next elections does support the idea that the political agenda part of the movie is toned down, but in no way missing. Anything associated with 9/11 is political pure and simple.

just factual events of what transpired that day.

Not true. The only ones who know what happened that day were the people on the plane and they are all dead. What we are seeing is a maybe and possible idea of what happened that day on the plane based on cockpit recordings and conversations people had on mobile phones.

Now the question is if we believe in the information that the goverment has often been forced to give out, or if we do not belive it.

But one thing for sure, its an american movie :) and will not make the top ten in Europe.
 
debate_junkie said:
Actually the film has a bit of an agenda in this.... they are donating a portion of box office sales to the Flight 93 memorial fund. I think just the other day I saw they gave 1.5 million, or thereabouts, to the fund, that is desperately needing money. It seems ONE politician is blocking a proposed bill to fund the memorial from coming out of committee.

So to the media, and those who say America is NOT ready... I say this... America has ALWAYS been ready... been ready for the heroism of the passangers and crew of Flight 93, who, in the face of death, made sure that the plane could not, and would not reach it's destination.
I wonder if Spike Lee gave any portions of the profits to the victims' families when he made "Son of Sam"...

I wonder how much JFK's family got when Oliver Stone made all that money off of a President's death...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom