- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
- Messages
- 29,714
- Reaction score
- 17,831
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
In a recent thread, the likes of which has become all too typical for this forum, a poster designed a thread that did not discuss any issue at all, but merely bashed and insulted "liberals". When the predictable responses came, the moderator supported the originating poster instead of sending the thread to the basement. Why? Is this now the defacto operating procedure of this site when obvious trolling and flame baiting receives support instead of being discouraged?
I would like to request that this site formulate a consistant policy when it comes to postings that do not discuss any issue at all, but merely bash people. There is a place in the basement ostensibly designed for such postings, and rightfully so as they have nothing to add to this site and only encourage more of the same. I don't really understand this change of policy where moderators are now running interferance for such postings instead of just relegating them to the place designed for such. Talk about a mixed message!
"Build it and they will come". Refusing to deal with people whose every posting is a flame bait is bad enough, but if we are now to the point where moderators are abetting the trolls, I think you folks need to rethink your M.O. What are you building here when people engage in obvious trolling and flame baiting and your moderators run interferance for them? Are you being consistant when you ask for civility, but your actual moderation takes the form of supporting the uncivil?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/conspiracy-theories/11267-watch-liberal-react.html
I would like to request that this site formulate a consistant policy when it comes to postings that do not discuss any issue at all, but merely bash people. There is a place in the basement ostensibly designed for such postings, and rightfully so as they have nothing to add to this site and only encourage more of the same. I don't really understand this change of policy where moderators are now running interferance for such postings instead of just relegating them to the place designed for such. Talk about a mixed message!
"Build it and they will come". Refusing to deal with people whose every posting is a flame bait is bad enough, but if we are now to the point where moderators are abetting the trolls, I think you folks need to rethink your M.O. What are you building here when people engage in obvious trolling and flame baiting and your moderators run interferance for them? Are you being consistant when you ask for civility, but your actual moderation takes the form of supporting the uncivil?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/conspiracy-theories/11267-watch-liberal-react.html