Why can't people accept that a flag is a social construct? There is nothing seperating it from a door mat other than history of people using it as a symbol. Personally, I don't see a need to burn any flags. A flag burner is not going to disagree with everything about a country; the United States is far to o complicated to be summed into a piece of fabric, so stop treating the piece of fabric as if it represented a whole country. I disagree with most people in this country on most debatable things: religion, politics, morals. However, I can't say I hate the country, because I don't hate the people I disagree with. And even if I did, the flag woundn't represent them. As far as these analogies are going, it's illogical to compare events of destroying public property and life to destruction of personal property. Even copyright doesn't expend so far as to prevent destruction of copyrighted material. The biggest part of this argument is that this form of expression
does not hurt anybody except for those who allow their feelings to be hurt. Don't cling to a symbol as a method of patriotism. They are only false idols created to oversimplfy ideas.
While I usually do not endorse use of the slippery slope argument, this is the case that I make the exception that keep me from a straight rule.
What happens when I draw a picture of an american flag with crayons and burn that? Heck, I'll make an MSpaint of the flag, save it to a floppy, and torch that. I'd like to know more of the limitations to this proposed amendment. There are plenty of symbols of america, why do flags get the special treatment? I might support a ban on wasting apple pies, or lighting off firecrackers on days other than the 4th of july.
Besides, this amendment would seriously hamper my American flag sacrifices to the spaghetti monster.